[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184417#comment-14184417 ] Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-750: - ok this should get us most of the way towards

[jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
This will permit the following to work: ```java abstract class Resource { abstract String id(); abstract String type(); @Inject static Resource create(@Named(quot;idquot;) String id, @Named(quot;typequot;) type) { return new AutoValue_Resource(id, type); } } ``` Note that if we

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
cc @jdaggett @andreaturli --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60507916

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
@@ -71,23 +72,6 @@ } /** -* returns an {@link Invokable} object that reflects a constructor present in the {@link TypeToken} type. unused, so traded this code out so that I could put a little more in. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #253](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/253/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60507947

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1342](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1342/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60507982

Re: [jclouds] added tenantId/projectId to volume and snapshot (#562)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #254](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/254/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/562#issuecomment-60508588

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds #1858

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1858/changes

Re: [jclouds] added tenantId/projectId to volume and snapshot (#562)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds #1858](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1858/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] added tenantId/projectId to volume and snapshot (#562)

2014-10-26 Thread inbar stolberg
:/ not sure why cloudbees fails ran locally ran fine --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/562#issuecomment-60509558

Re: [jclouds] Revert JCLOUDS-652: Require JDK 7 (0a801d2)

2014-10-26 Thread Izek Greenfield
Hi @adriancole , Why did you revert to java 1.6? It cause my many changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/commit/0a801d2ad2257a6d52550730d9c61c7553039007#commitcomment-8305382

Re: [jclouds-labs] Add vSphere support (#61)

2014-10-26 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Hi @igreenfield @if6was9 , I understand that the merge can be urgent, but many of the comments have still not being addressed (for example, the interfaces coupled to vijava). There have been recently several discussions about the providers in labs. You'll have seen that we've removed many of

Re: [jclouds] Revert JCLOUDS-652: Require JDK 7 (0a801d2)

2014-10-26 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Mainly to provide compatibility with a wider range of platforms. It's been discussed in [JCLOUDS-747](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-747) and in the dev@ list. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[jclouds-labs-openstack] OS Ceilometer API support (#166)

2014-10-26 Thread Avi Ben-Harush
OpenStack Ceilometer API#39;s support (Skeleton amp; meters/samples API) open issues I need help with - 1. meters and samples can get query params, problem is they cant be sent as null/empty string since ceilometer fails. example - {quot;filterquot;: quot;quot;, quot;orderbyquot;: quot;quot;,

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] OS Ceilometer API support (#166)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #469](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/469/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] OS Ceilometer API support (#166)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1908](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1908/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1908

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1908/changes

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] OS Ceilometer API support (#166)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests #470](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-pull-requests/470/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] OS Ceilometer API support (#166)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1909](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1909/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1909

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1909/changes Changes: [avi.ben-harush] OS Ceilometer API support -- [...truncated 4958 lines...] Starting test

Re: [jclouds-labs] Add vSphere support (#61)

2014-10-26 Thread Ignasi Barrera
My apologies for that. The recover the labs essence discussion was started after this PR was initially reviewed, and although the initial expectations have changed I hope people will understand that the change is for the benefit of jclouds. I really appreciate all the effort here and hope te

Re: [jclouds] Revert JCLOUDS-652: Require JDK 7 (0a801d2)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
Ps which many changes are you referring to? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/commit/0a801d2ad2257a6d52550730d9c61c7553039007#commitcomment-8306205

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
failures were due to the OCD checkstyle enforcing JLS order on test classes. bumped. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60520034

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1344](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1344/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60520946

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds #1859](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1859/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #256](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/256/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60522107

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Jeremy Daggett
@adriancole You may have already sorted this out, but one issue I ran into is that the build doesn't move the generated `@AutoService` metadata into the `/META-INF/services` directory. IIRC, the Maven resources plugin needs to be configured appropriately to include the generated file. ---

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds-labs-openstack #1910

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1910/

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
@jdaggett PTAL on this part. Let's fix the services maven thing in another pull request! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60522334

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
ps @demobox you're pretty good at maven fixing. mind having a look at the issue @jdaggett mentioned? should be possible to reproduce in azurecompute --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60522402

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #257](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/257/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60522811

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #258](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/258/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60522846

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1345](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1345/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60522907

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1346](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1346/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60523025

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1347](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1347/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60523065

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #259](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/259/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60523237

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1348](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1348/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60523487

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds » jclouds #1860

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1860/changes

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds #1860](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1860/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
@@ -209,4 +210,67 @@ public void testDeserializeEnumWithParserAndBadValue() { EnumInsideWithParser.Test.UNRECOGNIZED); } + private abstract static class SpinalCasedType { + abstract String id(); + + abstract String contentType(); + + // Currently,

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Jeremy Daggett
@@ -209,4 +210,67 @@ public void testDeserializeEnumWithParserAndBadValue() { EnumInsideWithParser.Test.UNRECOGNIZED); } + private abstract static class SpinalCasedType { + abstract String id(); + + abstract String contentType(); + + // Currently,

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
OK. pretty sure all required stuff is in now. 1. allow auto types to be deserialized via `@SerializedNames` 2. bind fallback FieldNamingPolicy to address serialization in providers that have consistent case format. Doesn't address providers with mixed case format, as that makes things

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
I'll merge after tests pass and I have a provider working that uses this. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60525207

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Jeremy Daggett
@adriancole Can you please expand on your comment on the mixed case names in Keystone/Neutron? An example of what you are talking about would be extremely useful, thx! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60525319

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds » jclouds #1861

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/changes

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #261](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/261/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60525576

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184569#comment-14184569 ] Adrian Cole commented on JCLOUDS-750: - Ok current progress assuming the above is in.

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds #1861](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1861/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184569#comment-14184569 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-750 at 10/26/14 5:57 PM:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184569#comment-14184569 ] Adrian Cole edited comment on JCLOUDS-750 at 10/26/14 5:58 PM:

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] At the cost of fiddling with type hierarchy adapters, remove lots of junk with google auto (#67)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
@jdaggett if you don't mind giving a quick review, I can showcase json in google storage. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/67#issuecomment-60525721

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] At the cost of fiddling with type hierarchy adapters, remove lots of junk with google auto (#67)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
+import org.jclouds.oauth.v2.domain.ClaimSet; +import org.jclouds.oauth.v2.domain.Header; +import org.jclouds.oauth.v2.domain.Token; + +import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet; +import com.google.gson.Gson; +import com.google.gson.TypeAdapter; +import

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1350](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1350/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60525805

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #262](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/262/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60525845

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1351](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1351/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60526136

Jenkins build is back to stable : jclouds » jclouds #1862

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1862/changes

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds #1862](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1862/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds #1863](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1863/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds #1863

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1863/changes Changes: [Adrian Cole] JCLOUDS-750 Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. [Adrian Cole] JCLOUDS-750 Added @SerializedNames which can apply to either a constructor or factory

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6 #263](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/263/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60527990

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-pull-requests #1352](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1352/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60528322

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert guava 18.0 on jclouds-labs. (#101)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #349](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/349/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/101#issuecomment-60528795

[jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-750 Start using AutoValue on Docker. (#102)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
this builds on https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586 and depends on it. You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/adriancole/jclouds-labs adrian.pilot-auto-docker Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-750 Start using AutoValue on Docker. (#102)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
cc @jdaggett @andreaturli --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/102#issuecomment-60528856

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-750 Start using AutoValue on Docker. (#102)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
bind(GsonModule.DateAdapter.class).to(GsonModule.Iso8601DateAdapter.class); } - - @Provides - @Singleton - public MapType, Object provideCustomAdapterBindings() { - return new ImmutableMap.BuilderType, Object() - .put(Container.class, new

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184629#comment-14184629 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-750: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184630#comment-14184630 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-750: - Commit

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-750 Start using AutoValue on Docker. (#102)

2014-10-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests #350](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/350/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/102#issuecomment-60528926

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184628#comment-14184628 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-750: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184633#comment-14184633 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-750: - Commit

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
merged into master and 1.8.x --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/586#issuecomment-60528963

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184632#comment-14184632 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-750: - Commit

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-750 Start using AutoValue on Docker. (#102)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
bind(GsonModule.DateAdapter.class).to(GsonModule.Iso8601DateAdapter.class); } - - @Provides - @Singleton - public MapType, Object provideCustomAdapterBindings() { - return new ImmutableMap.BuilderType, Object() - .put(Container.class, new

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-750) Replace hand-written domain classes with Auto-Value ones

2014-10-26 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14184631#comment-14184631 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-750: - Commit

Re: [jclouds-labs] Revert guava 18.0 on jclouds-labs. (#101)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1792](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1792/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-750 Start using AutoValue on Docker. (#102)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds-labs #1793](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1793/) FAILURE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs #1793

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1793/changes Changes: [Adrian Cole] JCLOUDS-750 Start using AutoValue on Docker. -- [...truncated 716 lines...] symbol: class SerializedNames location: package org.jclouds.json [ERROR]

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-1.8.x-branch #48

2014-10-26 Thread jenkins-no-reply
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-1.8.x-branch/48/changes Changes: [Adrian Cole] JCLOUDS-750 Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. [Adrian Cole] JCLOUDS-750 Added @SerializedNames which can apply to either a constructor or factory

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds » jclouds #1864

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1864/changes

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds #1864](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1864/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs #1794

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1794/ -- [...truncated 4167 lines...] [INFO] Exclude: **/atlassian-ide-plugin.xml [INFO] Exclude: **/.DS_Store [INFO] Exclude: .mailmap [INFO] Exclude: .git/** [INFO] Exclude: **/.gitignore

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs #639

2014-10-26 Thread jenkins-no-reply
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/639/ -- [...truncated 7449 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.4:install (default-install) @ joyentcloud --- [INFO] Installing

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs » jclouds Abiquo api #639

2014-10-26 Thread jenkins-no-reply
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/org.apache.jclouds.labs$abiquo/639/ -- [INFO] [INFO]

Re: [jclouds] Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (#586)

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
[jclouds » jclouds #1865](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1865/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds » jclouds-labs #1795

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1795/ -- [...truncated 4167 lines...] [INFO] Exclude: **/.metadata/** [INFO] Exclude: **/atlassian-ide-plugin.xml [INFO] Exclude: **/.DS_Store [INFO] Exclude: .mailmap [INFO] Exclude: .git/**

Re: [jclouds-site] Initial strawman for the 1.8.1 release notes (#138)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
Merged to [master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-site.git;a=commit;h=795753d69eaef5f5a97171c5377c9de993c0736b) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/138#issuecomment-60532934

Re: [jclouds] Revert JCLOUDS-652: Require JDK 7 (84b9f0d)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
Was this intended to be applied to 1.8.x? The modernizer plugin isn't configured for this branch, which is [breaking the build](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/view/1.8.x/job/jclouds-1.8.x-branch/48/console). I will revert the modernizer bit to get the build working again. If we want it, we

Re: [jclouds] Revert JCLOUDS-652: Require JDK 7 (84b9f0d)

2014-10-26 Thread Adrian Cole
Whoops. Sorry about that. I lose track of which things are on which branch. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/commit/84b9f0d0bdfebc3e9650abae306816b9ead1c0df#commitcomment-8307765

Re: [jclouds] Revert JCLOUDS-652: Require JDK 7 (84b9f0d)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
I lose track of which things are on which branch. I can imagine ;-) Just about to push the fix commit - no need to do anything at this point. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] Revert JCLOUDS-652: Require JDK 7 (84b9f0d)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
modernizer config [removed](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=ec70310dfea9ac24c7640149cbe70af998083848) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/commit/84b9f0d0bdfebc3e9650abae306816b9ead1c0df#commitcomment-8307849

Re: [jclouds] Use try-with-resources where appropriate (#506)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
Closed #506. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/506#event-183818538

Re: [jclouds] Use try-with-resources where appropriate (#506)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
With the recent changes as a result of [JCLOUDS-652](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-652), I'm guessing this is not applicable at this point? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/506#issuecomment-60535697

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-750 Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (671749d)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
Removing this [broke Abiquo downstream](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/view/labs/job/jclouds-labs/639/console). I'm thinking of reverting this part to get labs compiling again, then we can decide where we really want this. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-750 Allow abstract value types to be constructed from json using static factory methods. (671749d)

2014-10-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
I'm thinking of reverting this part to get labs compiling again [Reverted](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=2a5928b55dff2e7e26a29c1c887400d4c645852e) for now. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-1.8.x-branch » jclouds Abiquo api #55

2014-10-26 Thread jenkins-no-reply
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-1.8.x-branch/org.apache.jclouds.labs$abiquo/55/ -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-1.8.x-branch #55

2014-10-26 Thread jenkins-no-reply
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-1.8.x-branch/55/ -- [...truncated 15072 lines...] [Unloading class GregorSamsa$1] [Unloading class GregorSamsa$1] [Unloading class GregorSamsa] [Unloading class GregorSamsa$2] [Unloading class

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs » jclouds Abiquo api #640

2014-10-26 Thread jenkins-no-reply
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/org.apache.jclouds.labs$abiquo/640/ -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs #640

2014-10-26 Thread jenkins-no-reply
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/640/ -- [...truncated 7852 lines...] [Unloading class GregorSamsa$1] [Unloading class GregorSamsa] [Unloading class GregorSamsa] [Unloading class GregorSamsa$2] [Unloading class GregorSamsa] [Unloading

Jenkins build became unstable: jclouds » jclouds-labs-google #1561

2014-10-26 Thread BuildHive
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1561/

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-1.8.x-branch » jclouds Abiquo api #56

2014-10-26 Thread jenkins-no-reply
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-1.8.x-branch/org.apache.jclouds.labs$abiquo/56/

  1   2   >