[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-782) Add Shipyard provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Dancy updated JCLOUDS-782: -- Description: Add a provider for Shipyard to jclouds: http://shipyard-project.com/ Shi

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-782) Add Shipyard provider

Christopher Dancy created JCLOUDS-782: - Summary: Add Shipyard provider Key: JCLOUDS-782 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-782 Project: jclouds Issue Type: New Feature

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Added Image.deprecate, ImageApiMockTest completed, removed ImageApiExpec... (#98)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google #1780](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1780/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jc

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Added Image.deprecate, ImageApiMockTest completed, removed ImageApiExpec... (#98)

[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests #311](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/311/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/98#issuecomment-64025952

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Added Image.deprecate, ImageApiMockTest completed, removed ImageApiExpec... (#98)

> + public void start() throws IOException { > + super.start(); > + imageApi = api().images(); > + } > + > + ImageApi imageApi; > + > + public void get() throws Exception { > + server.enqueue(jsonResponse("/image_get.json")); > + > + > assertEquals(imageApi.get(URI.crea

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Added Image.deprecate, ImageApiMockTest completed, removed ImageApiExpec... (#98)

couple style notes. otherwise lgtm --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/98#issuecomment-64021541

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Added Image.deprecate, ImageApiMockTest completed, removed ImageApiExpec... (#98)

[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google #1779](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1779/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jc

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Added Image.deprecate, ImageApiMockTest completed, removed ImageApiExpec... (#98)

> +import org.jclouds.date.internal.SimpleDateFormatDateService; > +import org.jclouds.googlecomputeengine.domain.Deprecated.State; > +import > org.jclouds.googlecomputeengine.internal.BaseGoogleComputeEngineApiMockTest; > +import org.jclouds.googlecomputeengine.options.DeprecateOptions; > +import

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] Added Image.deprecate, ImageApiMockTest completed, removed ImageApiExpec... (#98)

[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests #310](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/310/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/98#issuecomment-64020804

[jclouds-labs-google] Added Image.deprecate, ImageApiMockTest completed, removed ImageApiExpec... (#98)

...tTest What do you think of the format of the ImageApiMockTest? If it looks good, ill start converting others to a similar format. You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/jclouds-labs-google imageDeprecate Or you can view, comment on it,

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-google » Apache jclouds labs google #335

See -- maven3-agent.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor-commons.jar already up to date <===[JENKINS R

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-google #335

See Changes: [Andrew Phillips] Moving full text of license to README -- [...truncated 296 lines...] [ERROR] [ERROR] -- [ERROR] 2 required artifacts are missing. [ERROR] [ERROR

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-480 start supporting version 4 signatures for aws-ec2. (#610)

[jclouds » jclouds #1951](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1951/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/610#issuecomme

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] L7 rebased (#97)

> but lawyers will be lawyers, right? :) *grin*. As long as we don't now get an ASF lawyer saying that the license **can't** be there... ;-) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/97#issuecomment-64014517

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] L7 rebased (#97)

eek. okie. weird that ASF code needs to be clarified as apache licensed, but lawyers will be lawyers, right? :) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/97#issuecomment-64013987

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] L7 rebased (#97)

> Would you like me to submit a PR for this? See [here](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs-google.git;a=commit;h=7348f01174faecb36f9afbafb719d8f9d0603d6f). I'd rather make sure you can spend your time contributing awesome code ;-) --- Reply to this email directly or view it

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] L7 rebased (#97)

Would you like me to submit a PR for this? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/97#issuecomment-64013400

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] L7 rebased (#97)

Yes please and thank you! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/97#issuecomment-64013172

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] L7 rebased (#97)

> They are ok with the option of the full text being in the README.md file or > stand alone LICENSE. Thanks for checking, @danbroudy! Would you be OK with us moving this to the readme, in that case? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-g

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] L7 rebased (#97)

Sorry for the mess but I have to comply with our open source contributing policy. Our lawyers are saying that the full text of the license must be in the source repository as described [here](http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new). Furthermore our lawyer said that I will not be abl

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-480 start supporting version 4 signatures for aws-ec2. (#610)

[jclouds-pull-requests #1412](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1412/) UNSTABLE Looks like there's a problem with this pull request --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/610#issuecomment-64010238

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-480 start supporting version 4 signatures for aws-ec2. (#610)

[jclouds-pull-requests-java-7 #324](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-7/324/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/610#issuecomment-64009006

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-480 start supporting version 4 signatures for aws-ec2. (#610)

base abstraction live tests added and pass ``` --- T E S T S --- Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=utf8 Running TestSuite Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator Starting test

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-480 start supporting version 4 signatures for aws-ec2. (#610)

[jclouds » jclouds #1950](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1950/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good [(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/610#issuecomme

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-480 start supporting version 4 signatures for aws-ec2. (#610)

[jclouds-pull-requests #1411](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1411/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/610#issuecomment-63999839

Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-480 start supporting version 4 signatures for aws-ec2. (#610)

[jclouds-pull-requests-java-7 #323](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-7/323/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/610#issuecomment-63997926

Re: [jclouds-labs-google] L7 rebased (#97)

I think we should revert the commit. It is redundant. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/97#issuecomment-63986260