@nacx I have updated the code with a few things like the clean up process and
returned the hardware flavors, i have one question about the custom hardware
settings, how is it supposed to work when the template builder looks through
the API flavors to find a matching template?
Maybe something is
@alibazlamit pushed 1 commit.
53154cd Fixed build issues
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/338/files/199bf6f23209071b5b5280fffea9ba44292279b1..53154cdfa6adad82f38aa830f78f637dce72d0ae
@alibazlamit pushed 1 commit.
199bf6f Updated with
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/338/files/de3656a5ac35be58214458e6a55a670e7e88c1d5..199bf6f23209071b5b5280fffea9ba44292279b1
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$core/2085/--
Started calculate disk usage of build
Finished Calculation of disk usage of build in 0 seconds
Started calculate disk usage of workspace
Finished Calculation of disk
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/org.apache.jclouds.labs$vagrant/1474/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2085/--
[...truncated 228.98 KB...]
Downloading:
https://repo.cloudbees.com/content/repositories/central/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/2.16/maven-surefire-plugin-2.16.jar
Downloaded:
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/1474/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch/32/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2084/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2084/
Squashed and pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/5b125b01)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/f8b36e5c).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
Closed #358.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/358#event-951050784
merged at
[master](https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;a=commit;h=34e42d6e)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-karaf/commit/e5f42e6d)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
Closed #96.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/96#event-951023357
@nacx pushed 1 commit.
c90409e Avoid NPE
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/358/files/f069dee2e5cbf08f337a7c8b86309b11c930a97c..c90409e5db0fd8b0ec7d61cffe3972317538046b
Thanks @geomacy! The details and PR are much appreciated!
I haven't read in detail the implementation, but wanted to early share a design
idea. Instead of propagating the list of current security groups to each piece
of code that might need it, what about:
* Create a `Supplier` that
andreaturli approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/358#pullrequestreview-20360165
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/358
-- Commit Summary --
* Cleanup orphaned availability sets
-- File Changes --
M
Exemplar PR description and jira tracking, btw -- impressive work @geomacy
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1059#issuecomment-277795103
andreaturli commented on this pull request.
Thanks @geomacy very useful!
I've only some minor comments now but I've not run testa yet. I'll do ASAP and
add my further comments.
> @@ -135,8 +136,9 @@ public NovaSecurityGroupExtension(NovaApi api,
}
Set groupNames =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854616#comment-15854616
]
Geoff Macartney commented on JCLOUDS-1235:
--
I have raised a candidate fix for this in
Proposed fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1235.
This change takes the approach of storing the information about the
overall list of groups within the `SecurityGroupInRegion` when it is
created, so that any subsequent conversion operation has access to all
the groups in the
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/96#pullrequestreview-20340386
Geoff Macartney created JCLOUDS-1235:
Summary: openstack-nova: list-security-groups request is slow,
with O(n^2) behaviour
Key: JCLOUDS-1235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1235
@nacx I think the build is fix now
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/96#issuecomment-22437
Closed #96.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/96#event-950755593
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/96#issuecomment-277762744
Reopened #96.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/96#event-950755630
/cc @nacx
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/96
-- Commit Summary --
* fix netty dependency
-- File Changes --
M pom.xml (2)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/96.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1234:
Labels: openstack-neutron openstack-nova (was: )
> openstack-nova -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854442#comment-15854442
]
Ignasi Barrera edited comment on JCLOUDS-1234 at 2/6/17 5:51 PM:
-
As you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854442#comment-15854442
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1234:
-
As you mention, this is a limitation of the Nova API.
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch/31/--
[...truncated 174.55 KB...]
[INFO] Downloading:
https://repository-jclouds.forge.cloudbees.com/release/org/apache/aries/java5-parent/1.0.0/java5-parent-1.0.0.pom
[INFO] Downloading:
@andreaturli pushed 1 commit.
2da7683 re-add jclouds-guice used by jclouds-cli
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-aws-2.0.x-branch/28/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-2.0.x-branch/27/--
Started by upstream project "jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch" build number 32
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "jclouds-2.0.x-branch" build number 21
originally
Geoff Macartney created JCLOUDS-1234:
Summary: openstack-nova - Indeterminate/invalid group reference
created in ingress rule if duplicate groups in region
Key: JCLOUDS-1234
URL:
I think this [breaks
jclouds-karaf](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2083/):
```bash
Caused by: org.osgi.framework.BundleException:
Unresolved constraint in bundle jclouds-netty [95]:
Unable to resolve 95.0: missing requirement [95.0] osgi.wiring.package;
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/org.apache.jclouds.labs$vagrant/1473/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/1473/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2083/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2083/
nacx commented on this pull request.
> jclouds-compute
-mvn:org.apache.jclouds.api/oauth/${jclouds.version}
-mvn:org.apache.jclouds.common/googlecloud/${jclouds.version}
-
mvn:org.apache.jclouds.provider/google-compute-engine/${jclouds.version}
+
andreaturli commented on this pull request.
> jclouds-compute
-mvn:org.apache.jclouds.api/oauth/${jclouds.version}
-mvn:org.apache.jclouds.common/googlecloud/${jclouds.version}
-
mvn:org.apache.jclouds.provider/google-compute-engine/${jclouds.version}
+
@nacx a friendly reminder anything on this?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/349#issuecomment-277730418
Closed #1058.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1058#event-950558068
merged at
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/4ae2d208) and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/663123a9)
thanks @nacx for reviewing it!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1058#pullrequestreview-20290968
andreaturli commented on this pull request.
> @@ -52,38 +52,56 @@ limitations under the License.
mvn:org.apache.jclouds.api/atmos/${jclouds.version}
@neykov you mean I can remove `resolver='(obr)'` for all the features?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
Reopened #1058.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1058#event-950310375
Hmmm instead of closing, let's re-open it fixing the version? It looks like the
current range (until version 4) could bring versions of the dependency
incompatible with the current import.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view
@andreaturli pushed 1 commit.
3896a3f fix karaf-maven-plugin
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/92/files/425dd892d3efc7f67a7d7b30e43c8b0fae519adf..3896a3fac4e477d55636ad7a4998b9897c8c2b2b
I've re-tested with the current version and it seems to work. Closing the PR,
though. Sorry for the noise, @nacx especially
OSGi is interesting ...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #1058.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1058#event-950184068
But that dependency is [exporting the
org.jboss.netty](https://github.com/netty/netty/blob/netty-3.5.9.Final/pom.xml#L414)
package, so there's something I don't get here. Where is this new package
coming from? It doesn't look like the jclouds driver is using it.
--
You are receiving this
I'm creating a `feature`for netty driver in jclouds-karaf
(`mvn:io.netty/netty/3.5.9.Final`) and it
doesn't seem to export `org.jboss.netty*` - changing the import solves the
problem
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-aws-2.0.x-branch/27/--
Started by upstream project "jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch" build number 31
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
Building remotely on 680cb864 (standard m1.large lxc-fedora17
nacx commented on this pull request.
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
org.jclouds.netty*;version="${project.version}"
org.jclouds*;version="${project.version}",
- org.jboss.netty*;version="[3.3,4)",
+ io.netty*;version="[3.3,4)",
Why this change? AFAIK with the [version of
Squashed and pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/a95905b3)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/9f582565).
Thanks for having a look @andreaturli!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Closed #356.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/356#event-949991556
60 matches
Mail list logo
