nacx commented on this pull request.
> +## Credits
+
+jclouds would like to thank everyone who contributed time and effort in order
to make this release happen:
+
+* [Svetoslav Neykov](https://github.com/neykov) for his support on the karaf
integration and for having contributed teh Vagrant pr
Go to
http://f192800187877c28d77d-912ab9cfe4c8304192c331e3bef81678.r92.cf5.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/195#issuecomment
demobox commented on this pull request.
> +## Credits
+
+jclouds would like to thank everyone who contributed time and effort in order
to make this release happen:
+
+* [Svetoslav Neykov](https://github.com/neykov) for his support on the karaf
integration and for having contributed teh Vagrant
That's the problem. The `PROPERTY_MAX_RATE_LIMIT_WAIT` controls how much time
you are willing to wait for a rate limited request to be retried. In OneAndOne,
it seems that in most cases you'll have to wait, at least, one minute, so the
value you are setting does not seem OK. You should set it to
This is an example of the error i get, the problems is the flow breaks and
tests fail, i have this property set
`properties.put(PROPERTY_MAX_RATE_LIMIT_WAIT, 60 * 1000);` it is passed to rate
limit class, one minute is the maximum time needed to wait for a new limit, i
am not sure what is wrong
Go to
http://d362ae36369489084afc-a3c1bd6c15eec19677e3ba6c29d73325.r9.cf5.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/195#issuecomment-
Go to
http://18a1cfe8f7d9cd8a50b0-32b7a8a1564e44899e8c2ab4210c7d12.r94.cf5.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/195#issuecomment
This is the draft for the 2.0.1 release notes. The branch is pushed to thee ASF
remote, so feel free to commit directly to it to amend/fix/add/remove anything.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/195
-- Commit Summary --
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-cli-2.0.x-branch/28/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1219:
Labels: packet (was: )
> Add support for Packet.net
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1219.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> Add support for Packet.net
> ---
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-cli-2.0.x-branch/27/--
Started by upstream project "jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch" build number 36
originally caused by:
Started by upstream project "jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch" build number 39
originally caused by:
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch/36/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2092/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2092/
Closed #364.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/364#event-966862743
Local tests passed now without transient failures. Thanks @neykov!
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/32d728ee)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/82cad92e).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to t
Squashed and pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/550ca7d5)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/e4e42454).
Thanks @danielestevez!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this emai
Closed #360.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/360#event-966854389
danielestevez commented on this pull request.
> @@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ public Image call() throws Exception {
Image image =
resourceDefinitionToImage.create(cloneTemplate.getSourceNodeId(),
cloneTemplate.getName())
.apply(definitions.get(0));
-checkSt
@danielestevez pushed 1 commit.
fe3a13b Fixes log message again
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/360/files/fee81c55eff009ed917785036decd884ca105b50..fe3a13bd07d2927ab4f69c8e1ce8ee451c048857
Tests from the same class are executed concurrently so don't share state in the
class. Additionally use temporary files/folders to allow for parallel builds.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/364
-- Commit Summary --
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
> @@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ public Image call() throws Exception {
Image image =
resourceDefinitionToImage.create(cloneTemplate.getSourceNodeId(),
cloneTemplate.getName())
.apply(definitions.get(0));
-checkSta
@danielestevez pushed 1 commit.
fee81c5 Fixes missing log message
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/360/files/c24e690f26b4e3fae5b3663f129f8e4bdcfa20b7..fee81c55eff009ed917785036decd884ca105b50
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2091/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2091/
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch/35/--
Started by upstream project "jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch" build number 38
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
Building remotely on 2641fb47 (standard m1.large lxc-fedora17 large)
This is the expected behavior. When you exceed the rate limit, the API returns
a 429 error, and then the retry handler is invoked. It is OK that the request
has failed. It is the retry handler that will decide if that failed request can
be retried in a while
The current implementation properly r
nacx commented on this pull request.
> + */
+@Beta
+public final class PartIdsFromHttpResponseFull extends
ParseSax.HandlerWithResult> {
+ private final StringBuilder currentText = new StringBuilder();
+
+ private final DateService dateParser;
+
+ private int partNumber;
+ private Date
nacx approved this pull request.
+1 Thanks @andrewgaul!
> +import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
+import com.google.common.annotations.Beta;
+
+@AutoValue
+@Beta
+public abstract class ListMultipartUploadResponse {
+ public abstract int partNumber();
+ public abstract Date lastModified();
+
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/550ca7d5)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/7611db87).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
http
Closed #363.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/363#event-966592173
nacx commented on this pull request.
> @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ public Image call() throws Exception {
Image image =
resourceDefinitionToImage.create(cloneTemplate.getSourceNodeId(),
cloneTemplate.getName())
.apply(definitions.get(0));
+checkState(image
33 matches
Mail list logo