[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-865) Create Message Queue Abstraction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15925447#comment-15925447 ] Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-865: - Don't worry about the distinction between core and labs. Some

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-865) Create Message Queue Abstraction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15925174#comment-15925174 ] Devang Gaur commented on JCLOUDS-865: - Openstack-marconi is currently in jclouds-labs-openstack ,

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-485) Keystone call GET /users/{user_id}/roles is not implemented

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-485: Labels: easyfix keystone newbie (was: easyfix newbie) > Keystone call GET /users/{user_id}/roles

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-485) Keystone call GET /users/{user_id}/roles is not implemented

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-485: Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Keystone call GET /users/{user_id}/roles is not implemented

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-485) Keystone call GET /users/{user_id}/roles is not implemented

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-485: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Keystone call GET /users/{user_id}/roles is not implemented >

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-485) Keystone call GET /users/{user_id}/roles is not implemented

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15924946#comment-15924946 ] Devang Gaur commented on JCLOUDS-485: - Hi, is this issue still relevant ? I'm asking because it was

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1255) Add support for Dimension Data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15924491#comment-15924491 ] Andrea Turli commented on JCLOUDS-1255: --- Thanks Trevor, looking forward for this provider. > Add

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1255) Add support for Dimension Data

Trevor Flanagan created JCLOUDS-1255: Summary: Add support for Dimension Data Key: JCLOUDS-1255 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1255 Project: jclouds Issue Type:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch #50

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-2.0.x-branch/50/-- Started by upstream project "jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch" build number 61 originally caused by: Started by upstream project "jclouds-2.0.x-branch" build number 37 originally caused by:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-google-2.0.x-branch #49

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-2.0.x-branch/49/-- Started by upstream project "jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch" build number 61 originally caused by: Started by upstream project "jclouds-2.0.x-branch" build number 37 originally caused

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-openstack-2.0.x-branch #49

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack-2.0.x-branch/49/-- Started by upstream project "jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch" build number 61 originally caused by: Started by upstream project "jclouds-2.0.x-branch" build number 37 originally

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-karaf #2118

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2118/

Jenkins build is still unstable: jclouds-karaf » jclouds :: Karaf :: Integration Tests #2118

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2118/

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-openstack #1187

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1187/

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs #1501

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/1501/-- Started by upstream project "jclouds" build number 3560 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Building remotely on c4b9a0bf (standard m1.large lxc-fedora17 large) in workspace

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fix listing nodes on gce when there is an instance created from a snapshot (#1076)

Closed #1076. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1076#event-998564435

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fix listing nodes on gce when there is an instance created from a snapshot (#1076)

Pushed to [master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/fdaa3fd7) and [2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/f5a5d869). Thanks @tommywo! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fix listing nodes on gce when there is an instance created from a snapshot (#1076)

nacx approved this pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1076#pullrequestreview-26738413

[jclouds/jclouds] Fix listing nodes on gce when there is an instance created from a snapshot (#1076)

Rebased from https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1075 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1076 -- Commit Summary -- * Wrap Image with Optional in DiskURIToImage -- File Changes -- M

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Fix listing nodes on gce when there is an instance created from a snapshot (#1075)

Closed #1075. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1075#event-998534185