Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs #1504

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/1504/-- Started by upstream project "jclouds" build number 3565 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Building remotely on 99756443 (standard m1.large lxc-fedora17 large) in workspace

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-aws #907

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-aws/907/

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-openstack #1189

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-openstack/1189/-- Started by upstream project "jclouds" build number 3565 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Building remotely on b997846f (standard m1.large lxc-fedora17 large) in workspace

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-aws #907

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-aws/907/

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs-aws » Apache jclouds labs aws #907

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-aws/org.apache.jclouds.labs$jclouds-labs-aws/907/

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-karaf » Apache jclouds :: Karaf #2123

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-karaf/2123/-- [...truncated 59.19 KB...] Downloading: https://repository-jclouds.forge.cloudbees.com/release/org/jdom/jdom/1.1/jdom-1.1.jar Downloading: https://repository-jclouds

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-karaf #2123

https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/2123/-- [...truncated 84.93 KB...] [WARNING] [WARNING] For this reason, future Maven versions might no longer support building such malformed projects. [WARNING] [INFO]

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-cli] Reference super features in assembly module (#37)

neykov commented on this pull request. > config -jclouds -jclouds-commands -jclouds-compute -jclouds-guice `jclouds-guice`, `jclouds` is included by `jclouds-compute` and it is inclu

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-cli] Reference super features in assembly module (#37)

@andreaturli This doesn't need `jclouds-karaf#98`. It's just for backwards compatibility. @demobox I've tried the distribution with `bin/jclouds` - it's working as expected. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: h

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-cli] Reference super features in assembly module (#37)

@neykov I assume this will work once we merge jclouds-karaf#98 right? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/37#issuecomment-287559924

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Group labs features in super features (#98)

+1 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/98#issuecomment-287559863

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

Out of curiosity, jclouds-cli requires it? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/99#issuecomment-287560210

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-cli] Reference super features in assembly module (#37)

@neykov Thanks for taking care of this! One thing: since I suspect the tests for the CLI are not entirely conclusive, please package a distribution from this branch and test it locally. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-cli] Reference super features in assembly module (#37)

demobox commented on this pull request. > config -jclouds -jclouds-commands -jclouds-compute -jclouds-guice Do we need to keep these? They are not directly included by the macro feat

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Group labs features in super features (#98)

> andreaturli commented 10 minutes ago Beat me to it, Andrea ;-) +1; looks good to me too - thanks, @neykov! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/98#issuecomment-28756

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

demobox commented on this pull request. > @@ -516,32 +521,27 @@ limitations under the License. -jclouds-compute I'm not sure what our pattern is here - for other features, we seem to be including _all_ transitive features, e.g.: ``` jclouds-compute j

[jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/99 -- Commit Summary -- * Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility -- File Changes -- M feature/src/main/feature/feature.xml (20) -- Patch Links -- ht

[jclouds/jclouds-cli] Reference super features in assembly module (#37)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/37 -- Commit Summary -- * Reference super features in assembly module -- File Changes -- M assembly/pom.xml (60) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/

[jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Group labs features in super features (#98)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/98 -- Commit Summary -- * Group labs features in super features -- File Changes -- M feature-labs/src/main/feature/feature.xml (16) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclo

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1258) S3 China Beijing Region Support

Archana Chinnaiah created JCLOUDS-1258: -- Summary: S3 China Beijing Region Support Key: JCLOUDS-1258 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1258 Project: jclouds Issue Type: I

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

bostko commented on this pull request. > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ protected String networkSecurityGroupName; protected String reservedIPName; protected Boolean provisionGuestAgent; + protected Boolean winrmUseHttps; Thank you very much for the suggestion. Looks good however I am more for

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

the build failure looks related, see https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/org.apache.jclouds.labs$azurecompute/1710/testReport/junit/org.jclouds.azurecompute.features/DeploymentApiMockTest/testCreateWindows/ -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

andreaturli commented on this pull request. a minor comment, but overall looks good > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ protected String networkSecurityGroupName; protected String reservedIPName; protected Boolean provisionGuestAgent; + protected Boolean winrmUseHttps; isn't `String listenerProtoc

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1254 Filters storage account by current available locations (#370)

rebuild please -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/370#issuecomment-287524079

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

rebuild please -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/371#issuecomment-287523859

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1257) Support Azure ARM Managed Disk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrea Turli updated JCLOUDS-1257: -- Description: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/manageddisks was:https://docs.micr

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1257) Support Azure ARM Managed Disk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15931114#comment-15931114 ] Andrea Turli commented on JCLOUDS-1257: --- see first PR for this at https://github.c

[jclouds/jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1257] Initial support ManagedDataDisks (#372)

- add DiskApi + tests - add ImageApi + tests - add TemplateOptions.dataDisks - use dataDisks in adapter You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/372 -- Commit Summary -- * Initial support ManagedDataDisks -- File Changes --

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1257) Support Azure ARM Managed Disk

Andrea Turli created JCLOUDS-1257: - Summary: Support Azure ARM Managed Disk Key: JCLOUDS-1257 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1257 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

mvn build seems to be successful however jenkins report it failed. ``` [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 5:23.302s [INFO] Finished at: Sat Mar 18 03:42:33 EDT 2017 ... [JENKINS] Archiving /scratch/jenkins/w

[jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

Listener protocol flag allowing https usage. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/371 -- Commit Summary -- * Azurecompute (Classic) - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration -- File Changes --