[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312723#comment-16312723
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1370:
--
Opened pull request: https://github
Also use CaseFormat instead of extra logic.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1167
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1370: Add CannedAccesPolicy constants
-- File Changes --
M apis/s3/src/main/java/org/jclouds/s3/domain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1371:
-
Description:
{{LocalBlobStore.list}} with the filesystem blobstore enumerates the entire
Andrew Gaul created JCLOUDS-1371:
Summary: LocalBlobStore.list enumerates entire container
Key: JCLOUDS-1371
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1371
Project: jclouds
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1366:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
> OutOfMemory when InputStream referencing to big file is used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312682#comment-16312682
]
Andrew Gaul edited comment on JCLOUDS-1366 at 1/5/18 8:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16312682#comment-16312682
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1366:
--
42079e1392fb5b2b792f518812689854c375
@gaul pushed 1 commit.
2d702af JCLOUDS-1369: improving slicing with many parts
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1166/files/eb0200ffe1f2d48d99ae7d0e7f296bd8c2b1bb06..2d702af421da5d7e0a25f52f286a8e99ce
I reworked this commit to correct the use of the slicing algorithm.
[JCLOUDS-1369](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1369) tracks
improving the algorithm itself.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Andrew Gaul created JCLOUDS-1369:
Summary: MultipartUploadSlicingAlgorithm makes suboptimal choices
with few part sizes
Key: JCLOUDS-1369
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1369
Sigh, I'll look at this tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1166#issuecomment-355236186
Previously `MultipartUploadSlicingAlgorithm` sliced larger payloads into
a number of fixed-sized parts and a single variable-sized last part.
Callers did not account for the last part which lead to exceeding the
maximum number of parts in `BaseBlobStore.putMultipartBlob`. Simplify
the interface by
Andrew Gaul created JCLOUDS-1368:
Summary: GCS cannot upload multipart file larger than 1 GB
Key: JCLOUDS-1368
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1368
Project: jclouds
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16292664#comment-16292664
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1302:
--
[~zreal] Please submit a pull req
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16290587#comment-16290587
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1366:
--
As a workaround can you try wrapping
gaul commented on this pull request.
>String invalidPathBlobKey = "Ahttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1162#pullrequestreview-80685315
gaul approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/202#pullrequestreview-79639284
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1358:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0.3
> putBlob with zero length InputSteam is failing for aws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16264647#comment-16264647
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1358:
--
Sorry I don't. Please look at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-1358.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Andrew Gaul
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> putBlob w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16259647#comment-16259647
]
Andrew Gaul edited comment on JCLOUDS-1358 at 11/21/17 6:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16259647#comment-16259647
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1358:
--
The jclouds test i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16257895#comment-16257895
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1358:
-
Description:
Right now there is a method payload(InputStream stream) in BlobBuilder, for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1358:
-
Labels: aws-s3 (was: )
> putBlob with zero length InputSteam is failing for aws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-1110.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Andrew Gaul
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> Atmos t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul reopened JCLOUDS-1110:
--
The truth is a little more complicated -- Atmos does support time-limited URLs
for get blob but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-598.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Andrew Gaul
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> At
I rebased and squashed your commit and pushed to master as
eaf3c779dce63ddc808d5ff8fe3ed9aade10b2f2. I included some test fixes and
pushed to master as 9dc85ecaabb23bdc0b1d6b3b6650f22673631203.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
Closed #1105.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1105#event-1330377191
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16242640#comment-16242640
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1281:
--
[~archupsg03] Now that DLO support me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-1080.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Zack Shoylev
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> Sw
The tests fail since they create a container name in the default region then
try to create DLOs in a different region.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1105#issuecomment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16236221#comment-16236221
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1066:
--
I added partial listing prefix suppor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul reassigned JCLOUDS-1337:
Assignee: Andrew Gaul
> Portable object-level storage clas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul reassigned JCLOUDS-953:
---
Assignee: (was: Andrew Gaul)
> jclouds should run integration tests on pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-577:
Labels: openstack-swift (was: )
> jclouds-cli blobstore container-list only lists the first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1106:
-
Labels: openstack-swift (was: )
> Cannot retry after server error, command has exceeded re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16236153#comment-16236153
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-920:
-
[~arunagiri] Could you retest with jcl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-920:
Labels: openstack-swift (was: )
> org.jclouds.openstack.keystone.v2_0.domain.User.getTenan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-635:
Labels: openstack-swift (was: )
> Incorrect error codes when writing a blob to a non exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1263:
-
Labels: openstack-swift (was: )
> Listing objects in Openstack Swift blob store contain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1080:
-
Labels: openstack-swift (was: )
> Swift container list call must explicitly specify J
jclouds lacks support for server-side encryption. We will gladly accept pull
requests to complete this work, including building on top of this one, but
someone needs to look at the interactions with SSE-C so that we do not preclude
implementing it in the future.
--
You are receiving this beca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220827#comment-16220827
]
Andrew Gaul edited comment on JCLOUDS-1349 at 10/26/17 5:2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220827#comment-16220827
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1349:
--
This interests me and we have used
gaul approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1152#pullrequestreview-71885965
gaul approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1150#pullrequestreview-71571973
gaul requested changes on this pull request.
> }
// Mac OS X HFS+ does not support UserDefinedFileAttributeView:
// https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030048
@Override
protected void validateMetadata(BlobMetadata metadata) throws IOException {
- if (!isMacOSX())
These providers map all storage tiers to `STANDARD`.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1151
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1337: Atmos putBlob portable storage tiers
* JCLOUDS-1337: B2 putBlob portable storage tiers
*
@nacx Agreed that this is inconsistent. I think it is better to throw
`SkipException` since this flags tests in an obvious way, although several
tests use `dataProvider` or conditional logic to avoid running some tests. If
you do change this, note that methods like `validateMetadata` are not t
gaul requested changes on this pull request.
> @@ -89,6 +91,15 @@ protected void checkUserMetadata(Map
> userMetadata1, Maphttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1150#pullrequestreview-71327087
@nacx You have described the problem exactly -- Java on Mac OS does not support
extended attributes. Could you add some test exclusions for tiers similar to
the ones we already have for other attributes?
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email d
I see the error on Jenkins -- I was not running the labs integration tests.
Fixed in jclouds/jclouds-labs@adb4087ab1c37bf8435b293778767e312d89e18b.
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/
> I'm merging this now to make the builds happy again, although a local build,
> with the blobstore changes in this PR reverted and rebased to the latest
> master version still presented some test failures. @gaul would you mind
> having a look at those?
Can you be more specific about these fail
Closed due to inactivity.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/748#issuecomment-338272496
Closed #748.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/748#event-1303436258
@nacx Sorry I missed this earlier. I fixed the tiering regression in
5448b92ee8c9ba230df9ad8e0d89b070f5b869ae.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149#issuecomment-338271
Still need to make a decision on how providers without tiering support handle
calls with tiers. See jclouds-dev thread.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1148#issuecomme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1347:
-
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Using BlobStore to copy a blob with non-ascii characters in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16203883#comment-16203883
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1347:
--
S3 requires URL-encoding x-amz-copy-so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1347:
-
Description:
The copyBlob method with Amazon S3 provider fails if the copied blob name has
for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1347:
-
Environment: (was: Using Amazon S3 provider)
> Using BlobStore to copy a blob with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1347:
-
Labels: s3 (was: )
> Using BlobStore to copy a blob with non-ascii characters in its n
@nacx I encountered similar CloudBees weirdness in jclouds/jclouds#1148 but
could not find a solution.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/414#issuecomment-336373671
I will add storage tier support for copyBlob in a separate pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1148#issuecomment-335980294
CloudBees seems to be consuming some kind of Java 8 artifact with a JVM prior
to 8:
```
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
hudson/remoting/Launcher : Unsupported major.minor version 52.0
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Re
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1148#issuecomment-335918428
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1148
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1337: Portable storage tiers
* JCLOUDS-1337: Azure putBlob portable storage tiers
* JCLOUDS-1337: S3 putBlob portable storage tiers
* JCLOUDS-133
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16193863#comment-16193863
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1253:
--
Pull requests welcome.
>
Closed due to inactivity.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1009#issuecomment-332911517
Closed due to inactivity.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697#issuecomment-332911390
Closed #1009.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1009#event-1270278806
Closed #697.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697#event-1270278027
@stevegomez17 Please stop adding irrelevant comments to jclouds pull requests.
I have been deleting these.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1084#issuecomment-332682134
@timuralp Do you have any insight into this issue? Otherwise we can close this
pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1084#issuecomment-331726071
Sorry code is incomplete without tests. Please reopen if you want to complete
this.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/790#issuecomment-331724074
Closed #790.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/790#event-1262728330
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16177741#comment-16177741
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-114:
-
jclouds is community-developed software
Closed due to inactivity.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/198#issuecomment-331580937
Closed #198.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/198#event-1262100447
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-1335.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> Azure Blob object-level storage clas
Closed #863.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/863#event-1260633235
Closed due to inactivity.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/863#issuecomment-331355485
@marcuswanner do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/198#issuecomment-331355396
Closed due to inactivity.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/130#issuecomment-331355317
Closed #130.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/130#event-1260632255
@bostko do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/964#issuecomment-331355075
@olivierlemasle do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1009#issuecomment-331355104
@Xianguang-Zhou do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/886#issuecomment-331355022
@olivergondza do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/863#issuecomment-331355000
@yaronr do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/790#issuecomment-331354974
@vapgar200 do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/748#issuecomment-331354957
@limorbortman do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697#issuecomment-331354917
@pimenas do we have a path forward on this pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/433#issuecomment-331354779
Please just sign up for a Rackspace account which takes a few minutes. I have
spent hours reviewing code with you.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1105#issuecomment-33
Sorry how do these issues relate to your problem?
Please do not make substantial edits to comments which are better addressed as
new comments. GitHub does not generate mails for these and it ruins the flow
of the discussion.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
I decline to share my Rackspace credentials which are linked to my credit card
with some random Internet person.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1105#issuecomment-33125
The new tests will fail until the tiering goes GA or if you opt into the
preview:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/announcing-the-public-preview-of-azure-archive-blob-storage-and-blob-level-tiering/
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email d
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1147
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1335: Upgrade to Azure Blob API 2017-04-17
* JCLOUDS-1335: Azure Blob object access tiers
-- File Changes --
M
providers/azureblob/src/main/ja
701 - 800 of 4217 matches
Mail list logo
