[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16051951#comment-16051951
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1308:
-
The purpose of the jclouds abstractions is to provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1310:
Labels: aws-s3 (was: )
> Use AWS S3 Transfer Accelerat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1310:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.2)
(was: 2.1.0)
> Use AWS S3 Trans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16051473#comment-16051473
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1310:
-
I think [~gaul] will be able to help better than me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1310:
Component/s: jclouds-blobstore
> Use AWS S3 Transfer Accelerat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16051463#comment-16051463
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1308:
-
[~graemem] What about the option I mentioned about
Closed #397.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/397#event-1124850801
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/b77ea069) and
[2.0,.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/c1fb7620).
Thanks @andreaturli!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16050143#comment-16050143
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1309:
-
See also the discussion thread in the jclouds-dev
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1113#pullrequestreview-44230735
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/#pullrequestreview-44230579
>why only against 2.0.x?
I developed it in 2.0.x, but will be merged to master too.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/397#issuecomment-308659972
nacx commented on this pull request.
>
+ PublicKey userKey = readPublicKey(options.getPublicKey());
+ final String fingerprint = computeFingerprint(userKey);
+
+ synchronized (CreateSshKeysThenCreateNodes.class) {
+ boolean keyExists =
nacx commented on this pull request.
>
+ PublicKey userKey = readPublicKey(options.getPublicKey());
+ final String fingerprint = computeFingerprint(userKey);
+
+ synchronized (CreateSshKeysThenCreateNodes.class) {
To avoid race conditions on this "getOrCreate" method.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1308:
Component/s: jclouds-compute
> Azure ARM Default Netw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1308:
Affects Version/s: 2.0.1
> Azure ARM Default Netw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1308:
Labels: azurecompute-arm (was: )
> Azure ARM Default Netw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16049269#comment-16049269
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1308:
-
The old implementation presented several issues
@andreaturli please review.
Apologies for the noise in the PR; I've formatted the class to 3-space indent.
There is a small set of changes:
* Generate a unique name for the generated key pair if the user does not
provide a key. We were generating them with repeated names.
* Improve the check
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
Thanks @danielestevez!
> +* The metrics API includes operations to get insights into entities
> within your
+* subscription.
+*
+* @see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/monitor/metrics;>docs
+*/
+ @Delegate
+
Closed #1112.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1112#event-1118895074
nacx commented on this pull request.
> - * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
- * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
- * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
- * limitations under the License.
-
* Adds Alpine Linux as a known OSFamily to jclouds-compute, and improves the OS
detection in Packet.
* Packet has an API to set the key pairs, so this PR removes the default script
that implicitly uploads the key via SSH if it is configured in the options.
* Also removes a couple unused classes.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera reopened JCLOUDS-1306:
-
Reopening to just set the fix version
> [Openstack] Deleting a SG doesn't invalid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1306:
Fix Version/s: 2.0.2
2.1.0
> [Openstack] Deleting a SG does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1306.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> [Openstack] Deleting a SG doesn't invalidate the ca
Can he JIRA issue be marked as Fixed?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1110#issuecomment-307359040
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1293.
-
Resolution: Workaround
The root cause of the issue is not under control of jclouds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16040673#comment-16040673
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1293:
-
The PR with the fix to mitigate the issue is now
Closed #1108.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1108#event-1113384460
Pushed to master as
[5113be22](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/5113be22).
Thanks @stuarthendren!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
nacx commented on this pull request.
> + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.jclouds.aws.ec2.compute.strategy;
+
+import static org.testng.Assert.assertTrue;
+import static org.testng.Assert.assertFalse;
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1300.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> Unable to launch gce in jenk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1122.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> Add support for subnetwork definit
Merged to master and 2.0.x.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1106#issuecomment-305116803
Closed #1106.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1106#event-1103713309
As part of the recent Karaf fixes we already changed the assembly pom to
reference the super-features. Can we close this PR?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/3b8f5c60)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/f294ab10).
Thanks @alibazlamit!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
Closed #395.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/395#event-1102467728
Can you please squash the commits?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/395#issuecomment-304878450
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/395#pullrequestreview-40947489
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
> @@ -74,7 +74,11 @@ static boolean is64Bit(int architecture) {
return tryFind(asList(OsFamily.values()), new Predicate() {
@Override
public boolean apply(OsFamily input) {
-return
I've jsut seen you already did it :) Dismiss the last comment!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1107#issuecomment-304669367
This should be safe to backport to 2.0.x too. Let's cherry-pick it?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1107#issuecomment-304669253
Interesting. That's because the headers logger logs the [deserialized
form](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/jclouds/http/HttpUtils.java#L215),
not the raw header, and the decoder returns [a date in the
Closed #1102.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1102#event-1100660531
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/b3d21f96) and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/f7390443). Thanks
@geomacy!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Closed #1100.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1100#event-1100659998
Pushed to
[master](https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs.git;a=commit;h=b3da4b3)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/2e41dc90).
Thanks @bostko!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1102#pullrequestreview-40723452
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1100#pullrequestreview-40514504
Looks good, thanks! Mind squashing the commits?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1100#issuecomment-304276407
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1295
@neykov Mind trying Azure ARM with this fix?
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1107
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1295: Support deprecated date formats in the Expires
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera reassigned JCLOUDS-1295:
---
Assignee: Ignasi Barrera
> Azure ARM Improve "Expires" he
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16025901#comment-16025901
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1293:
-
Thanks for sharing your tests in the issue. Your code
Closed #393.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/393#event-1097453958
@nacx pushed 1 commit.
e4460d9 Fix tests
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1106/files/b291b80d353f3b74cb3b4559fd09c01079612168..e4460d9ed917435a0b7d5e2a6bced02a515bfd0b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera closed JCLOUDS-1292.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
> AWS - Unexpected end of file from ser
Closed #1006.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1006#event-1096914031
Superseded by https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1106.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1006#issuecomment-303951835
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1122
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300
This PR supersedes https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1006.
It includes the commit from the original PR, adds the missing tests, and
changes several methods on the NetworkApi to make ti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera reassigned JCLOUDS-1122:
---
Assignee: Ignasi Barrera
> Add support for subnetwork definition in google comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera reassigned JCLOUDS-1300:
---
Assignee: Ignasi Barrera
> Unable to launch gce in jenk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1270:
Labels: aws-s3 (was: )
> AWS us-east-1 region is not in the list of returned regi
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
Thanks @geomacy!
> +import org.jclouds.json.SerializedNames;
+import org.jclouds.logging.Logger;
+
+import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
+
+/**
+ * A route in an Amazon EC2 Route Table.
+ *
+ * @see
Looks good. That's the right dependency to be added...
http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.jclouds.labs%7Cprofitbricks-rest%7C2.0.1%7Cbundle
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/3bd117ec)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/d8887b74).
Thanks @danielestevez!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly
Closed #392.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/392#event-1093021811
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/391#issuecomment-303089383
>I take it you get the error in master too?
Yes. Something to investigate. But I'd rather keep this PR on hold for a while,
just to make sure auth failures don't come (apart from other things) from
signature issues?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/7aa033a9)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/1a622a3b).
I just pushed your first commit (I asked for the test result since I found the
same issue when running the tests locally,
Closed #390.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/390#event-1091730951
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/391
-- Commit Summary --
* Added new US-NJ location to ProfitBricks
-- File Changes --
M
I don't know why it raises that unauthorized error. I tried with my account
with the same results.
Also tried modifying the test to bind the form4 signer by default, without
success, and creating a specific test in the awsec2 provider that extends the
one in the generic ec2, but with the same
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/390#pullrequestreview-39417783
LGTM. Can you share the results of the live tests?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/390#issuecomment-303038224
The Packet provider implements all the features from the portable compute
abstraction it supports and has been stable for the last releases. There have
not been live tests failures in the weekly test builds, so I think it is ready
to be promoted.
/cc @andrewgaul @zack-shoylev
You can view,
Good!
Have you been able to run the live tests for the affected APIs?
>By the way how is the @ApiVersion actually injected in places like FormSigner,
>for example? I think the value is being taken from AWSEC2ApiMetadata but I
>couldn't work out how jclouds configures Guice (or whatever) to
Unit tests may fail because they hardcode the expected version. Live tests will
tell us if the change is safe. Let's run them for the classes that use the
annotation.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I like the annotation approach and agree that the flexibility needed in ARM,
where they deploy new versions of the APIs quite often (but keeping backward
compatibility) might not be needed here.
A couple questions:
* It would be worth considering the annotation at class level too. Could you
nacx commented on this pull request.
> + @Fallback(NullOnNotFoundOr404.class)
+ FirewallRuleTarget.PortList getPortList(@PathParam("id") String portListId);
+
+ @Named("network:deletePortList")
+ @POST
+ @Path("/deletePortList")
+ @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
+
nacx commented on this pull request.
> +import javax.ws.rs.Produces;
+import javax.ws.rs.QueryParam;
+import javax.ws.rs.core.MediaType;
+import java.util.List;
+
+@RequestFilters({ BasicAuthentication.class, OrganisationIdFilter.class })
+@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1122:
Labels: google-compute-engine (was: )
> Add support for subnetwork definition in goo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1122:
Component/s: (was: jclouds-labs-google)
jclouds-compute
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1300:
Affects Version/s: 2.0.1
> Unable to launch gce in jenk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1300:
Labels: google-compute-engine (was: )
> Unable to launch gce in jenk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1300:
Component/s: (was: jclouds-labs-google)
> Unable to launch gce in jenk
@utkarsh-devops This PR has been quiet for some time. Feel free to step in and
help with the remaining bits!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16011869#comment-16011869
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1298:
-
Interesting. In ProfitBricks there is a similar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16008251#comment-16008251
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1296:
-
Hmmm it is not the only operation that puts
Enabling all features has no impact on the size of the package, so there is no
reason not to preinstall all non-labs features. I've made the list configurable
anyway to let users customize that at build time.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16008123#comment-16008123
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1275:
-
Many thanks [~gnt]!
> CLI is broken after upgrad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1275.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> CLI is broken after upgrading Ka
Merged :) Many thanks for your great and quick support!
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/39#issuecomment-301075562
Many thanks, @gnodet! Both versions, shell and interactive are working now.
I've added the `feature` feature to the boot features to be able to install
other jclouds providers in the interactive shell via `feature:install`. I
assume this is correct?
```diff
diff --git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1290:
Labels: aws-ec2 (was: )
> Inconsistency in IpPermission.grou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1290:
Component/s: jclouds-compute
> Inconsistency in IpPermission.grou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1290:
Affects Version/s: 2.0.1
> Inconsistency in IpPermission.grou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16007750#comment-16007750
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1290:
-
+1 to use {{SecurityGroup.id()}}. The {{id}} field
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/104
-- Commit Summary --
* Fix Chef commands
-- File Changes --
M
chef/commands/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint/jclouds-chef-commands.xml
(16)
-- Patch Links --
1001 - 1100 of 6767 matches
Mail list logo
