nacx commented on this pull request.
> @@ -131,7 +131,8 @@ public NovaComputeServiceAdapter(NovaApi novaApi, @Region
> Supplier
if (templateOptions.getKeyPairName() != null) {
options.keyPairName(templateOptions.getKeyPairName());
}
-
+ if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16260568#comment-16260568
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1359:
-
It really depends on the hardware profile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1342.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.3
2.1.0
> Azure-
Closed #412.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/412#event-1351615646
Merged to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/30a500f8)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/96fca7eb).
The commit in this PR contained changes not related to this PR (it has 108
files) because the branch was not properly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16260452#comment-16260452
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1359:
-
The {{minDisk}} attribute is used for image
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1355.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> Enable VM to be created with
Merged to master as
[5d82a3df](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/5d82a3df).
Thanks, @nelsonjr!
Although changes are backward-compatible I haven't cherry-picked it to 2.0.x
because there are conflicts. 2.0.x only supports legacy networks and there is
no a clean merge.
--
Closed #1157.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1157#event-1351520717
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1157#pullrequestreview-78036013
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16255137#comment-16255137
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1356:
-
Many thanks [~alex.heneveld] for the detailed report
This is a good and small tutorial on rebasing and squashing commits:
https://help.github.com/articles/about-git-rebase/
I'm not confident on rebasing the PR myself, as it now lists 103 commits and I
don't know exactly which ones should I cherry-pick to properly merge the
feature.
I'd suggest
Thanks for the detailed bug report and for the PR @thomasgl-orange!
Although I fully understand the memory leak, I'm a bit concerned about
introducing a cross-context instance. If at some point the JDK bug gets fixed,
users might expect all context-scoped resources to be released when the
@code4clouds the PR still has 89 commits, whilst after squashing and rebasing
it should have just one.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/412#issuecomment-343856776
Closed #1155.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1155#event-1335684225
Merged to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/c468c60d) and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/f4ecb785). Thanks
@kirankhopade!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on
I know @code4clouds, but I always prefer the contributors to do it, so they can
write their commit message and properly explain the contents of the
contribution in a single commit.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1155#pullrequestreview-75695468
Many thanks @code4clouds for all the fixes and the continued effort. Ready to
merge!
Mind squashing all the commits into a single one and get it rebased to the
latest version of master so I can cleanly merge the PR? Thanks!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/412#pullrequestreview-75370449
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
> + }
+
+ public void testGet_NetworkProfile() throws InterruptedException {
+
server.enqueue(jsonResponse("/virtualmachinescalesetget.json").setResponseCode(200));
+ final VirtualMachineScaleSetApi vmssAPI =
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/c9cd6eaf)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/fd22d3ad).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
nacx commented on this pull request.
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ protected synchronized void
> createDefaultNetworkIfNeeded(String group, String lo
logger.debug(">> network options have not been configured. Creating
network %s(%s) and subnet %s(%s)", name,
nacx commented on this pull request.
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ protected synchronized void
> createDefaultNetworkIfNeeded(String group, String lo
logger.debug(">> network options have not been configured. Creating
network %s(%s) and subnet %s(%s)", name,
nacx commented on this pull request.
Thanks @jmspring! Huge effort!
I'm adding some general comments after a first review, but I still have to go
in deeper detail through the entire PR again:
* In the model classes, enforce immutable lists.
* Also try to use non-null collections and enforce
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/417
-- Commit Summary --
* Add tags to virtual network creation
-- File Changes --
M
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1351:
Fix Version/s: 2.0.3
> AWS CentOS marketplace AMI misdetecting OS t
Merged to 2.0.x. Thanks again!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1153#issuecomment-341683558
nacx commented on this pull request.
> + String subnetName = String.format("s-%s-%s",
> this.getClass().getSimpleName().toLowerCase(),
> System.getProperty("user.name"));
+ this.subnet = createDefaultSubnet(resourceGroupName, subnetName,
virtualNetworkName, "10.2.0.0/23");
+
nacx commented on this pull request.
> + /**
+* The private IP address version of the Virtual Machine Scale Set Ip
Configuration Properties
+*/
+ @Nullable
+ public abstract String privateIPAddressVersion();
+
+ /**
+* The load balancer backend address pools of the Virtual
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1351.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
> AWS CentOS marketplace AMI misdetect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1351:
Labels: aws-ec2 (was: )
> AWS CentOS marketplace AMI misdetecting OS t
Merged to master. Thanks @rdowner! Worth (and safe) to backport to 2.0.x?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1153#issuecomment-341655207
Closed #1153.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1153#event-1324521329
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1153#pullrequestreview-74024311
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
Thanks @code4clouds!
We're almost there. There are a couple annotations still to be removed and I've
tried to detail what tests should verify and how.
> +
+ /**
+* The subnet of the Virtual Machine Scale Set Ip Configuration Properties
+*/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1350:
Labels: aws-ec2 (was: )
> AWS EC2 mis-detecting OS version of im
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1350:
Component/s: jclouds-compute
> AWS EC2 mis-detecting OS version of im
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1348:
Labels: cloudstack (was: )
> CloudStack - template(image) IDs not uni
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1348:
Component/s: (was: jclouds-drivers)
jclouds-compute
> CloudSt
nacx commented on this pull request.
> +package org.jclouds.azurecompute.arm.domain;
+
+import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
+import org.jclouds.javax.annotation.Nullable;
+import org.jclouds.json.SerializedNames;
+
+import java.util.List;
+
nacx commented on this pull request.
> +package org.jclouds.azurecompute.arm.domain;
+
+import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
+import org.jclouds.javax.annotation.Nullable;
+import org.jclouds.json.SerializedNames;
+
+import java.util.List;
+
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/415#pullrequestreview-72137239
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220222#comment-16220222
]
Ignasi Barrera edited comment on JCLOUDS-1349 at 10/26/17 9:35 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220222#comment-16220222
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1349:
-
Thanks! These reports are great. I see
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/414#pullrequestreview-71838067
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
Thanks @code4clouds!
Final comments added. Mostly related to the general comments I made about the
use of the nullable annotation and tags field. I pointed out every item that
still needs to be addressed, and added a comment about the mock tests.
>
Closed #1150.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1150#event-1309207208
Merged to master as
[f7b74d95](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/f7b74d95).
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1150#issuecomment-339231822
If this works, the profile must also be defined in `jclouds-karaf` and
`jclouds-cli`. I forgot those projects when merging the first PR.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
This changes how we reference the toolchain to use a Maven property. This will
allow us to be more flexible and generic when configuring builds in Jenkins and
we can avoid having a dedicated maven profile for each JDK version we want to
support. A property can be overridden in the command-line,
Ok, I've cleaned up the commits and the code, leaving just the proper test
skip, as the other methods were already ok.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1150#issuecomment-339019323
> I think it is better to throw SkipException
Done!
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1150#issuecomment-338887045
@nacx pushed 1 commit.
6e5357f Throw skip exceptions instead of silently passing tests
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1151#pullrequestreview-71406314
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1150
-- Commit Summary --
* Exclude tier tests on OSX
-- File Changes --
M
apis/filesystem/src/test/java/org/jclouds/filesystem/integration/FilesystemBlobIntegrationTest.java
Done: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1150
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149#issuecomment-338790224
Sure I'll do. I was just guessing and asking before diving into the code :)
I'll open a PR in short. Thanks for confirming!
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
And looks like everything is back to green! Thanks @gaul!
It looks like failures only happen on my machine (but consistently). Is it
possible that they fail on Mac? I recall some tests failing in the past because
it did not support file attributes. Is the tier information stored there? That
@andreaturli Apart from the Tier test failures it looks like there are actual
test failures related to this change. Mind having a look?
@gaul It looks like there are test failure sin jclouds-labs regarding the Tiers
change. Mind having a look?
--
You are receiving this because you are
Builds should now be fixed, rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/414#issuecomment-338618947
I added one additional profile, jenkins-jdk8 to preconfigure the JDK8
toolchain. It's needed by how we have configured the "jclouds-compat" build,
but I'm pretty sure we can clean that by using variables to define the jdk
version and vendor instead of having two profiles. I'll have a look at
Ok. I think we're OK with the toolchains approach. I tried to script the
scripts to bulk-update all the jobs in Jenkins but I got permission errors; I
don't have permissions to run scripts and did not found where to configure
that, so I've manually updated all HEAD, 2.0.x, live test and pull
Back to green. Thanks @demobox!
WDYT about the toolchain approach? Shall we go for it?
@gaul are the Tier fixes OK?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
The branch needs to be pushed to the ASF remote :)
Anyway, LGTM, so feel free to push it directly to master!
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149#issuecomment-336810594
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149#issuecomment-336799667
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149#issuecomment-336798769
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149#issuecomment-336798479
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149#issuecomment-336797003
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149#issuecomment-336796459
This is a PR to experiment with Maven toolchains approach to let Jenkins use
the right JDK to build jclouds.
Do not merge yet.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1149
-- Commit Summary --
* Add Jenkins profile to use
@demobox have you seen this issue before? Looks like a bug in CloudBees we
could report?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/414#issuecomment-336401374
rebuild please
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/414#issuecomment-336372593
>Do you have thoughts on externalizing the tenantId which is hard coded in the
>live test?
I don't have the context of the discussion, but isn't it part of the
`oauth.endpoint` property? It could be parsed and exposed, for example in a
provider method in the AzureHttpApiModule so it can be
nacx commented on this pull request.
> +VirtualMachineScaleSetDNSSettings dnsSettings =
> VirtualMachineScaleSetDNSSettings.create(dnsList);
+
+NetworkInterfaceConfigurationProperties
networkInterfaceConfigurationProperties =
+
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
Thanks for the fixes @code4clouds!
Still some comments to address.
Also, in general, remove the `@Nullable` annotation from all the collection
fields where we enforce presence and immutability. The annotation should only
be present where users can
>Do you take the changes from the amends added or should I create a new PR?
No need to open a new PR. Thanks for the fixes! I'll review it now.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Apologies for the huge delay @pimenas . The original reviewers are not active
in the project and the PR got unattended.
The changes LGTM. @andreaturli Mind having a look? If you approve the changes
I'll merge the PR.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
nacx requested changes on this pull request.
Thanks, @code4clouds!
Just some general considerations apart from the existing comments:
* jclouds uses a 3 space indent.
Please,
format the code using our [coding
standards](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/Coding+Standards).
*
I've extracted the `customData` stuff and pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/c9f272b9)
and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/eec594dd).
Should we better close this pull request and work on keyvault in a new one?
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1282.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.3
2.1.0
> Support cus
I've finally had some time to look at this. Thanks for starting this proposal!
I like the idea of having the API methods return a stream clients can write to,
but I'm not sure about several things that are needed to have that.
It's weird for me to have an OutputStream in the HttpResponse. If I
nacx approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/411#pullrequestreview-62401089
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16162686#comment-16162686
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1330:
-
I'd say, when deleting a node, we should delete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1304.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks, [~jmspring], it is a duplicate.
> Azure: Support for cus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1282:
Affects Version/s: 2.0.2
> Support custom-data in Azure ARM template opti
I meant, auth failures when tests try to access the nodes. Credentials are
working fine. Aren't you using a custom image?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
nacx approved this pull request.
LGTM. I don't think these tests provide *real* value to the functionality of
the class.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> all tests passes now.
@alibazlamit have you executed them with any custom parameter? I've run them
just providing the credentials and I get authentication failures.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #408.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/408#event-1240211444
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1328.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.3
2.1.0
> Upd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1328:
Labels: profitbricks (was: )
> Update ProfitBricks to the latest API vers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-1328:
Affects Version/s: 2.0.2
> Update ProfitBricks to the latest API vers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-1258.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.2)
2.0.3
Squashed and merged to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/1c1f81c3) and
[2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/cfdbc810).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@nacx pushed 1 commit.
1a8f45e Remove check
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1142/files/0f536f4f48bcb38b594f455c4826de39c023e136..1a8f45e40ae22fab167298be8a145d5b203f32d9
Done. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1142#issuecomment-327826026
That's great, thanks @alibazlamit! Mind squashing the commits so we can cleanly
merge the PR?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/408#issuecomment-327812113
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16156992#comment-16156992
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1258:
-
Fix for the FormSignerV4: https://github.com/jclouds
801 - 900 of 6767 matches
Mail list logo
