merged
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/248#issuecomment-199401134
Closed #248.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/248#event-597523251
Is this needed for the compute service adapter?
It's causing issues against one of the docker service providers I am testing
with.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/247
-- Commit Summary --
* Update DockerComputeSer
The compute example does not work because of
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/248
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/85#issuecomment-198543447
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/85
-- Commit Summary --
* Adds some jclouds Docker examples that work with getcarina.com
-- File Changes --
M rackspace/pom.xml (6)
A
rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclou
@nacx I figured that out about the mirror. Fun github stuff :)
I like the idea of doing this through the template options. I will look into
that.
---
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15200099#comment-15200099
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1095:
---
Quite a few issues were fixed in 2
Is this needed for the compute service adapter?
It's causing issues against one of the docker service providers I am testing
with.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/248
-- Commit Summary --
* Use non-privileged mode
…t swift testing
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/935
-- Commit Summary --
* Ensures parallel tests don't step on each other in Static Large Object
swift testing
-- File Changes --
M
apis/openstack-swift/src/test/
Closed #930.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/930#event-582153031
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/930#issuecomment-193907443
Thanks @andrewgaul ! I will refactor this a bit, but there are some other swift
tests to fix after this, I think. Adding this to swiftproxy is also a good idea
- I'll try to look into it some more.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/930
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/930
-- Commit Summary --
* Fixes an intermittently failing swift live test.
-- File Changes --
M
apis/openstack-swift/src/test/java/org/jclouds/openstack/swift/v1/features/StaticLa
Alright. If @andrewgaul has no other notes, let's rebase to a single commit and
get ready to merge?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/923#issuecomment-190421271
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ public void testExtractArchive() throws Exception {
>
> .extractArchive(containerName, payload, "tar.gz");
> assertEquals(extractResponse.getCreated(), OBJECT_COUNT);
> assertTrue(extractResponse.getError
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ public void testExtractArchive() throws Exception {
>
> .extractArchive(containerName, payload, "tar.gz");
> assertEquals(extractResponse.getCreated(), OBJECT_COUNT);
> assertTrue(extractResponse.getError
Closed #926.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/926#event-563988981
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/926#issuecomment-188361377
The only problem is backwards compatibility, but as long as we don't backport,
I think this is a good change. We have been moving in the direction of using
more boxed types already, especially with AutoValue making it easier to do so.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https:
Ah, thanks @andrewgaul
I think either approach can work (fixing current code or switching to database
metadata storage and filesystem blob data storage (probably using uuids or
similar). The problems I see with the former you have already mentioned. The
problem with the latter is that splittin
Closed #906.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/906#event-561946182
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> *
> */
> @Beta
> -@Extension(of = ServiceType.IDENTITY, namespace =
> ExtensionNamespaces.OS_KSADM)
> +@Extension(of = ServiceType.IDENTITY, namespace =
> ExtensionNamespaces.OS_KSADM, name = "OpenStack Keystone Admin", alias =
> "OS-KSADM")
Keystone only has two exte
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/926
-- Commit Summary --
* Add alias fallback info to keystone and nova extensions.
-- File Changes --
M
apis/openstack-keystone/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/keystone/v2_0/e
> I think that is also needed for all the @GET methods in ContainerApi.java,
> ObjectApi.java and StaticLargeObjectApi.java
I could only find the format=json in the spec for Container list as described
in the original issue... I am not sure if it applies to everything - it might.
---
Reply to t
Is there a particular openstack doc that describes these are not required to be
set? Would be good to documents this for this PR.
As for releases, it's fairly easy to use the master snapshot in-between
releases, which we try to do every 4-5 weeks.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Closed #922.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/922#event-555950479
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/922#issuecomment-185996610
swift on ubuntu:
DEBUG:swiftclient:REQ: curl -i
https://storage101.ord1.clouddrive.com/v1/MossoCloudFS_0d629063-aa0f-4bf9-9e04-62e1fd6aaa2c?format=json
-X GET -H "X-Auth-Token:
Good to get confirmation. It's in the spec and other clients use it. Still
having some issues with the path test thou
Other clients?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/922#issuecomment-185907321
Reopened #922.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/922#event-555498877
Closed #922.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/922#event-555498872
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1080
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/922#issuecomment-185851026
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/922
-- Commit Summary --
* Ensures the Swift container list call requests JSON as per spec
-- File Changes --
M
apis/openstack-swift/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/swift/v1/fe
Closed #920.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/920#event-554304616
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/920#issuecomment-185441445
Zack Shoylev created JCLOUDS-1080:
-
Summary: Swift container list call must explicitly specify JSON
Key: JCLOUDS-1080
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1080
Project: jclouds
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/920
-- Commit Summary --
* Fix testSupplierExpirationReloadsTheCache sometimes failing
-- File Changes --
M
compute/src/test/java/org/jclouds/compute/suppliers/ImageCacheSupplierTe
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-553060104
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#issuecomment-185022439
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-553039295
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-553039303
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552946212
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552946202
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552923924
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552923922
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Map userMetadata();
> +
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Date ifModifiedSince();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Date ifUnmodifiedSince();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract String ifMatch();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract String ifNoneMatc
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552894084
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552894060
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552870704
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552870696
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552818199
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552818210
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552763661
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552763672
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552696471
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552696458
Reopened #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552688062
Closed #203.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#event-552688046
This depends on the referenced PR, so checks will fail until the dependency is
updated
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203#issuecomment-184879641
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#issuecomment-184878990
Closed #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-552663369
Reopened #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-552611490
Closed #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-552611483
Seems like unrelated. Hm.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#issuecomment-184865214
Reopened #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-552550952
Closed #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-552550896
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Map userMetadata();
> +
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Date ifModifiedSince();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Date ifUnmodifiedSince();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract String ifMatch();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract String ifNoneMatc
Renamed and refactored, @nacx
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#issuecomment-184389383
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203
-- Commit Summary --
* Renames extension resolver
-- File Changes --
M
openstack-neutron/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/neutron/v2/config/NeutronHttpApiModu
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/203
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#issuecomment-184389012
> @@ -42,6 +43,18 @@
> /**
> * We use the annotation {@link Extension} to bind a class that implements
> an extension
> * API to an {@link Extension}.
> + *
> + * Match in the following order:
> + *
> + * 1. Match by namespace
> + * 2. Match by namespace aliases
> + * 3. Match by alias
> + *
> @@ -42,6 +43,18 @@
> /**
> * We use the annotation {@link Extension} to bind a class that implements
> an extension
> * API to an {@link Extension}.
> + *
> + * Match in the following order:
> + *
> + * 1. Match by namespace
> + * 2. Match by namespace aliases
> + * 3. Match by alias
> + *
One note, but otherwise looks good.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/919#issuecomment-184335423
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Map userMetadata();
> +
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Date ifModifiedSince();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract Date ifUnmodifiedSince();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract String ifMatch();
> + @Nullable
> + public abstract String ifNoneMatc
Well this finally worked :)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#issuecomment-183509362
Reopened #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-548967084
Closed #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-548967071
Closed #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-548831939
Reopened #918.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#event-548831953
Rebuild, please.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918#issuecomment-183423745
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15144860#comment-15144860
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
More questions:
1. If you
Needed for new openstack versions.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/918
-- Commit Summary --
* Enhance the way openstack extensions are resolved.
-- File Changes --
M
apis/openstack-keystone/src/main/java/org/jclou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15143337#comment-15143337
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
Is this reproducible with the la
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15143308#comment-15143308
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
To clarify this a bit, which versio
merged
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/202#issuecomment-181889626
Closed #202.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/202#event-544407519
Looks good, what about the TODOs?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/916#issuecomment-181867164
Name can already be used for automatic resolution.
Needed because namespace is being deprecated. Alias should also be added at
some point (for automatic resolution).
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/202
-- C
@nacx @devcsrj +1
This will also have a nice side-effect of speeding builds up a bit.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/201#issuecomment-180402552
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128747#comment-15128747
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
Do you have the wire logs where the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128179#comment-15128179
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
What are the wire logs like with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15126966#comment-15126966
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
I think that's a good idea.
+1
Just a note, we shouldn't be back-porting this (obviously). But it should roll
out with v2.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/911#issuecomment-177975312
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15123482#comment-15123482
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
[~gaul] Any ideas on this probl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15123082#comment-15123082
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
I think I was able to reproduce thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15122622#comment-15122622
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
I am trying to get this reproduced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15122588#comment-15122588
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
It's strange that this wire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15121871#comment-15121871
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
The timestamp between the two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15121438#comment-15121438
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
Do you have the wire log from that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15118472#comment-15118472
]
Zack Shoylev commented on JCLOUDS-1064:
---
Which version of jclouds, 1.9.
201 - 300 of 1837 matches
Mail list logo
