Pushed to master as 80a0256cc7919b32612cfa585e7f4224f412ea02.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/438#issuecomment-51665774
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1480](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1480/)
UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/438#issuecomment-49500652
jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #1480 UNSTABLE
Spurious [test
failure](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-compute/1480/testReport/junit/org.jclouds.compute.util/ConcurrentOpenSocketFinderTest/testChecksSocketsConcurrently/).
+1, looks good
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
-import com.google.common.io.InputSupplier;
-
-public interface Payload extends InputSupplierInputStream, Closeable {
+public interface Payload extends Closeable {
I resubmitted this pull request and we can
@aledsage wrote:
Is deleting Strings2.toString(InputSupplier) rather than deprecating it too
aggressive for 1.8?
Agreed and I added back this method in 0df905a870563236bb095772ae00a1975ec3aece.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
-import com.google.common.io.InputSupplier;
-
-public interface Payload extends InputSupplierInputStream, Closeable {
+public interface Payload extends Closeable {
By that, do you mean merging it to master once
[jclouds » jclouds
#1390](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1390/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1009](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1009/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/438#issuecomment-49500572
Relating more to the already-merged commit
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/commit/fb60d76704745317186ad700e9b7ce5a569a614d,
and as commented on in the JCLOUDS-622 issue ...
Is deleting `Strings2.toString(InputSupplier)` rather than deprecating it too
aggressive for 1.8? Though guava 18 will
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1459](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1459/)
ABORTED
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/438#issuecomment-49153335
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
-import com.google.common.io.InputSupplier;
-
-public interface Payload extends InputSupplierInputStream, Closeable {
+public interface Payload extends Closeable {
@andrewgaul It looks like you deprecated the
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
-import com.google.common.io.InputSupplier;
-
-public interface Payload extends InputSupplierInputStream, Closeable {
+public interface Payload extends Closeable {
@jdaggett I removed the interface changes and
[jclouds-java-7-pull-requests
#1472](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-7-pull-requests/1472/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/438#issuecomment-49246057
[jclouds » jclouds
#1382](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1382/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds
#1363](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1363/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
15 matches
Mail list logo
