Commit is
[here](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;a=commit;h=176deecd8e3f98165c41c6d72055b597ac0ed3d0)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37957108
Squashed, rebased and merged. Many thanks @demobox and @iocanel !
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37909638
Closed #39.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf
#809](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/809/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pu
> jclouds » jclouds-karaf #808 ABORTED
I think this might have been an old build, too:
```
Tests run: 37, Failures: 36, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1
Build was aborted
Putting comment on the pull request
Finished: ABORTED
```
> jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #51 UNSTABLE
No [test
failures](https://jclouds
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests
#51](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/51/)
UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37844960
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf
#808](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/808/)
ABORTED
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37843451
> jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #50 ABORTED
That was the old PR build.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37839816
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests
#50](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/50/)
ABORTED
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37839741
Reverted the last commit and invoked the mirror job. It should trigger again
the build, and eventually have it fixed!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37838122
The other test build is also unhappy with 76bb055:
``
karaf@root> 183111 [main] ERROR org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.JUnit4TestRunner -
Exception
java.lang.RuntimeException: Cannot get the remote bundle context
at
org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc.client.intern.RemoteBundleContextClientImpl.getRemoteBundl
> If you are OK, though, this afternoon I'll merge it including the last commit
> or not, depending on that
> last build result.
OK. Also running another test build with the last commit without using the PR
builder job:
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/view/integrations/job/jclouds-karaf-do17x
Once it finishes, clean the workspace and close/reopen the PR again to trigger
again the build. If you are OK, though, this afternoon I'll merge it including
the last commit or not, depending on that last build result.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jcl
Based on the other test run, I'm good to commit the PR as at 756b0dd (i.e.
without 76bb055). I'm really curious why the PR build isn't happy...something
to do with the merging, perhaps? Really no idea. I'll clean the workspace,
though.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
htt
Eek...lots of things going bang in the PR build now:
```
Apache Karaf (2.2.7)
Hit '' for a list of available commands
and '[cmd] --help' for help on a specific command.
Hit '' or 'osgi:shutdown' to shutdown Karaf.
karaf@root> Exception in thread "JMX Connector Thread
[service:jmx:rmi://0.0.0.0
Actually, we may not even need that. The [test
build](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/view/integrations/job/jclouds-karaf-do17x/1/console)
I ran (before the last commit, notice) is already happy:
```
Checking out Revision 756b0dde5e78be5528c53df2f5dd89530fd2140e (origin/do17x)
...
karaf@root> fe
Ok, we have the last change in place. Let's see if it makes the build happy! :)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37827937
Thanks for the pointers @iocanel! I'm building it locally right now and will
push the missing bit in few minutes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37826845
We should already have
```
${maven.repo.local}
```
but I guess the other change is still missing. Thanks, @iocanel!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37825566
@demobox: It's not enough to have the artefact in the local repo. We also need
to make sure that we tell karaf were too look.
We need
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/commit/f212c9177a47bf6cbf2c10484652d565351c#diff-7c886e8267b3c8c3fc641c991371ed33R100
and
https://github.com/jclou
Also running this in a separate job to see if this failure is reproducible:
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/view/integrations/job/jclouds-karaf-do17x/1/console
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37824227
> jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #49 UNSTABLE
Hm. [Same
failure](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/org.apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/49/testReport/org.jclouds.karaf.itests/MiscFeaturesInstallationTest/testDigitalOceanFeature_MiscFeaturesInstallationTest_testDigitalOceanF
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests
#49](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/49/)
UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37821204
Ioannis is alive!!! Yay ;-)
Thanks for explaining, @iocanel! If I understand correctly, @nacx's suggestion
of adding `maven.repo.local` seems to be the right one..?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37821175
@demobox @nacx:
Due to the way the maven repo is set on CloudBees, we need to tell the karaf
instance that is used in the integration tests, where to find the local maven
repo.
The other thing that we need to do is to ensure that all the required artefacts
are inside that repo.
So we need to:
> Do you think we can just go ahead and get it merged, or better try adding
> only the
> maven.repo.local to the itests pom and see if that fixes the tests?
It's weird, because after all only _one_ test is failing. Could you try adding
`maven.repo.local` to see if that makes any difference? If
@demobox to make the CloudBees build happy, it seems we'd have to backport
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/commit/f212c9177a47bf6cbf2c10484652d565351c
too, but it upgrades Karaf from 2.2.7 to 2.3.2. Do you think we can just go
ahead and get it merged, or better try adding only the `
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf
#805](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/805/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pu
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests
#48](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/48/)
UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39#issuecomment-37775327
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf do17x
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/39
-- Commit Summary --
* Added support for the DigitalOcean provider
-- File Changes
30 matches
Mail list logo