Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-05 Thread Andrew Phillips
> Addressed your comments, commited, and published Thanks, Ignasi! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36740301

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-05 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Addressed your comments, commited, and published. Thanks for reviewing @demobox ! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36738059

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-05 Thread Andrew Phillips
* Blog links work * Author and date for blog titles looks nice * "Cloud Providers" link works * Some review comments for the [blog post](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/commit/76e9a653b83d123fcc43cde0d8cca235b3bec761) Many thanks for putting that together, @nacx, and for all your work on

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-04 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Closed #58. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-04 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Merged! Huge thanks to all! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36688356

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-04 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://894e5357efa58d8ea789-5e782fbee94b8c6bb092e4748146a495.r49.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36648480

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-04 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #202](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/202/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36648180

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-04 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://9cd9cd55c584fecebb2b-4536752bb6f4d6735190fddcc68c121b.r39.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36646658

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-04 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #201](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/201/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36646437

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://1b8a48b71b14668ec88e-8f018a5e0a20b39abc763cc7fc4f2ba7.r87.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36576456

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #200](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/200/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36576281

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://5f5c76d0ae31c29657f3-ce10666acc207bc2a2c4d10e66026eca.r10.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36575235

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #199](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/199/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36575137

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread Ignasi Barrera
I've just added a blog post about the move to the ASF, the new site and the 1.7.0 and 1.7.1 release. It's been a while since the last post, and we should properly announce the new site and the new releases. I'm not the best one at writing, so feel free to comment or directly edit the post! ---

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://6c51efcb70dd975b240c-f3a3f42054c8a2f614324a87c08e9be8.r64.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36573801

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #198](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/198/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36573582

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread Ignasi Barrera
@demobox It's not intentional, and it should be great to have it fixed before merging. The logo issue was mentioned [here in the old pull request](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/51#issuecomment-31812479), and I couldn't make it be properly aligned. Any help on this is highly appre

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread Andrew Phillips
Is this my browser/window size, or intentional? ![image](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/223702/2315259/502ec904-a321-11e3-8c79-a4d7952f28c9.png) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36567304

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread Ignasi Barrera
@everett-toews I tried that but that broke all other links in the site, and couldn't find a way to do that... :( --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36566809

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-03 Thread Everett Toews
@nacx Thought of one more. It would be nice to have if we could have the actual blog posts under jclouds.apache.org/blog//MM/DD instead of how they current are under jclouds.apache.org//MM/DD. I'm in the middle of a 12 hour meeting right now so I really don't have a chance to dig into

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-02 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Great! Tonight I'll update the guides to point to 1.7.1, disable the atOC in the ComputeService guide and merge. I'll also try to write a blog post about the rebranding, 1.7.0 and 1.7.1. If I have it soon and can be reviewed it would be nice to use it to announce the new site. Nice job all!

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-02 Thread Everett Toews
I just noticed the Installation Guide is for 1.7.0. That should be 1.7.1. That's it. Let's go for it! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36485189

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-02 Thread Ignasi Barrera
I like both @everett_toews. Thanks! What's left before merging then? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36484597

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-02 Thread Everett Toews
@nacx As you can see in b945be5 I shortened the "gettingstarted" dir to just "start" and "installation-guide" to just "install". I did that because i'm not crazy about compound words in URLs and such an important URL like http://jclouds.apache.org/start/install/ should be short. If you're not ha

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-02 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://11c69b2b2e415d6b3f25-ddbcfa626cc19773f6332a93a4e5e344.r88.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36483996

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-02 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #197](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/197/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36483900

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-02 Thread Andrew Phillips
> It looks like this Nice! Being able to minimize or hide this would be a bonus, but as you said: let's get this merged sooner rather than later if we think it's good enough, and work on improvements later. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jcloud

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-03-02 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Agree @demobox. I'm working on getting a better TOC. I'm making it similar to [toficy](http://gregfranko.com/jquery.tocify.js/), but due to the layout of our pages it does not render properly, so it myself. It looks like this, and keeps fixed in its position (does not disappear when scrolling

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-27 Thread Andrew Phillips
> Finally I had time to finish the generic TOC. Nice, thanks @nacx! One initial comment about the sample TOC: it's so long that a reader now has to scroll down quite a way to see some content. Is there some way we could make this expandable, with "minimized" being the default? Either section by

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-27 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Finally I had time to finish the genetic TOC. It has room for improvements, but basically it generates a TOC based on the page headings (h1 to h3, but if you think having from h4 to h6 too in the TOC is a good idea is a trivial change), with the appropriate nesting levels. To use it in a page,

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-27 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #196](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/196/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36261531

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://ad45a6d358f43958e25a-1b323d3a83db100c58eca5c5f5e6a3c4.r84.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36179544

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #195](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/195/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36179288

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
> but Akka defines itself as a toolkit too Ah...interesting data point. Thanks! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36140965

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread Ignasi Barrera
In terms of ranking I think people search for things like "digitalocean java api", "s3 java", etc. But I'm not sure how people search for this kind of thing: perhaps "portable" isn't also relevant in searches… I just don't know, and would also like to have feedback from more people on this :) J

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread Andrew Phillips
> I think toolkit is a better name I'd be curious to hear what others have to say on this. I agree that jclouds does quite a lot of things, but I wonder if there is any kind of precedence for calling what we do a "toolkit". E.g. in terms of search rankings, do we think people are likely to sear

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://3c529895763ecb8a8cf5-8b5ff73a2fe803863960f0ac1c5775da.r50.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36116484

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #194](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/194/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36116316

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://11e1685771642b44f348-bb0388ed1166b0878c4afb3f7cef0832.r62.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36114773

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #193](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/193/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36114464

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://10720684367b760da111-612fee7537882e5d5391dafbf9b878ad.r97.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36113179

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #192](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/192/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36113017

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread Ignasi Barrera
We should also write a blog post announcing the "new year changes": new site, 1.7.0 (with all its stuff) and 1.7.1, and ideally should be published along with the new site, to properly announce it. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pul

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-26 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Thinking more about it, I think *toolkit* is a better name. jclouds is not just a library, is a set of libraries that can be used to manage the cloud, so I think *toolkit* defines better what jclouds is. I've just uploaded a commit with the slogan changed in the main page, and also rebranded th

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Andrew Phillips
> jclouds-cli is arguably fills this, albeit poorly Indeed. But it's more of a "downstream project" than the core of jclouds itself? Certainly, it's not the _only_ usable bit of jclouds we release. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pul

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Ignasi Barrera
I also like the proposed slogan but perhaps with "library" instead. I think it describes better what jclouds is amd how it can be used, but I'd also be happy with toolkit. Don't have a very strong preference. @gaul, Ioannis already did an example web console for jclouds. Do you have in mind som

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Andrew Gaul
Regarding stand-alone application, jclouds-cli is arguably fills this, albeit poorly. Having an end-user example of how to take advantage of jclouds cross-provider functionality would give the project and our users a huge boost. I opened [JCLOUDS-479](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLO

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Andrew Phillips
> Added Load Balancer providers, DigitalOcean and CloudSigma DC Thanks for the updates, @nacx! Just about: ![image](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/223702/2265142/ad9468fa-9e7c-11e3-9a26-98a7a07e960e.png) In terms of consistent capitalization, would "Get in Touch!", "Attend an Event" and "Who

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Andrew Phillips
> Apache jclouds® is an open source multi-cloud toolkit for the Java platform. > jclouds gives you the > freedom to create applications that are portable across clouds while giving > you full control to use > cloud-specific features. I like this. The only word I'm not 100% sure about is "toolk

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://2e452be9bb477df01422-0c307192fbf46be1ea27e735ac77.r15.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36067775

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #191](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/191/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-36067548

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Everett Toews
On Feb 22, 2014, at 12:58 AM, Andrew Phillips mailto:notificati...@github.com>> wrote: How about something like "The Java multi-cloud library"? Does "cloud interfaces" sound a little too abstract to others, too? We see a lot of developers asking about cloud APIs or cloud providers, but I don't

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Andrew Gaul
> I like our current mission statement and I think it should be on the front > page. My only change was to basically replace Java and Clojure with JVM. I'm > on crazy about using an acronym in our mission statement but it should > somehow reflect that it works with many Java technologies. Hones

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Andrew Phillips
Couple of random comments: ![image](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/223702/2259136/c94664e0-9e31-11e3-990f-4a0537f0b9b4.png) Do we need to add Load Balancer here, since we list it as one of the abstraction APIs on the front page? ![image](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/223702/2259852/37895c

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://b42d7362ca1187be989e-a12ebec22ba501beca2d2bd61aa12867.r19.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-35997188

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread Ignasi Barrera
* Rebranded the community index site and the jclouds user list to make the, better looking. * Also moved the "supported providers" link from the Community menu to the Documentation one, as that is what jclouds does, not what people does with jclouds. * Removed the "Report a Bug" from the Documen

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-25 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #190](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/190/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-35996903

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-21 Thread Andrew Phillips
> slogan How about something like "The Java multi-cloud library"? Does "cloud interfaces" sound a little too abstract to others, too? We see a lot of developers asking about cloud APIs or cloud providers, but I don't hear the term "cloud interfaces" much. If we _do_ want to stick to that theme,

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-21 Thread Ignasi Barrera
@everett-toews Thanks a lot for your help here! I've been very busy this week and I haven't had time. I plan to finish stuff this weekend and early next week so we can publish it. Regarding the slogan and the tag line, agree in both :) I'd also change a couple things: Move the "Providers" secti

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-20 Thread Everett Toews
Let's publish this! What's left that __absolutely__ needs to be done? - [ ] Decide on the slogan - [ ] Decide on the tag line When these thing are done, let's publish it. We should publish on March 3rd or before, in time for the next meetup. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHu

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-20 Thread Everett Toews
@nacx How would you feel about renaming the gettingstarted dir to just start? I'm not crazy about compound words in URLs. Also, how about renaming installation-guide to just install? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomme

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-20 Thread Everett Toews
My opinion on the slogan/tag line issue. Slogan: Simplified Cloud Interfaces I like our current slogan in general but the comma thing is a bit dramatic. This isn't "Girl, Interrupted". Tag line: Apache jclouds® is an open source library that helps you get started in the cloud and utilizes your

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-20 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://08abda524d9802e1e79f-de8b32be9b04620f0c76a8ecd94c22bf.r55.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-35675369

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-20 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #189](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/189/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-35675163

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-17 Thread Andrew Phillips
Many thanks for the big chunk of new pages, @everett-toews! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-35288392

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-17 Thread Andrew Phillips
Many dead links in the user guides, but I guess the intention is not to fix those now. Only one rendering glitch and a potential duplicate page ("report a bug"). Thanks, @everett-toews! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issueco

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-17 Thread jclouds-commentator
Go to http://434bb7e9702b6869b399-1b12a0d89965209da2541e7b6b370c06.r38.cf1.rackcdn.com/ to review your changes. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-35238167

Re: [jclouds-site] Rebranding proposal (#58)

2014-02-17 Thread CloudBees pull request builder plugin
[jclouds-site-pull-requests #188](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/188/) SUCCESS This pull request looks good --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/58#issuecomment-35237951