[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Bayer resolved JCLOUDS-381.
----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.8.0)
                   1.7.0

Checked into master - this'll be in 1.7.0. I still need to do some docs work 
for it, though.

> Allow creating nodes through ComputeService with explicitly specified names
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCLOUDS-381
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-381
>             Project: jclouds
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jclouds-compute
>            Reporter: Andrew Bayer
>            Assignee: Andrew Bayer
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> Currently, instance naming for nodes created through 
> ComputeService.createNodesInGroup() etc uses a combination of the specified 
> group name and GroupNamingConvention's unique suffix - generally that's a 
> three character random string, but for EC2 it's the id string for the 
> instance. While this is fine for many cases where the instance name doesn't 
> need to be referenced directly by actual humans, say, it's a pain for those 
> cases. Currently, you can work around this by creating instances through the 
> per-api/provider clients/apis, or through some hacks for single instance 
> creation through ComputeService utilizing provider-specific TemplateOptions 
> classes, but there's no generalized way to get real control over the names 
> given to instances through ComputeService. This should be possible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to