swebb2066 merged PR #334:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/334
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
swebb2066 opened a new pull request, #334:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/334
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
swebb2066 commented on PR #333:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/333#issuecomment-1903011007
On Ubuntu gcc 9, benchmarks improve from:
| Benchmark | Time | CPU | Iterations |
| | - | -- | --- |
| Testing disabled logging request | 0.474
swebb2066 opened a new pull request, #333:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/333
Ths PR improves benchmarks (on Windows) from:
| Benchmark | Time | CPU | Iterations |
| --- | -- | -- | -- |
| Testing disabled logging request | 2.70 ns | 0.391
rm5248 commented on issue #332:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/332#issuecomment-1902818118
> > possible to call the DOMConfigurator::configure function multiple times
in my program
>
> Yes. `DOMConfigurator::configure` is most usefully automatically called
swebb2066 commented on issue #332:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/332#issuecomment-1902814172
> possible to call the DOMConfigurator::configure function multiple times in
my program
Yes. `DOMConfigurator::configure` is most usefully automatically called
when
swebb2066 commented on issue #332:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/332#issuecomment-1902810015
> FileAppender works just fine. I was thinking how could I optimize it more.
The default value of `BufferedIO` is false [documented
atari83 opened a new issue, #332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/issues/332
Hello!
So, I'm working on a program that produce about 100K rows of data per minute
and approximately each row is about 2K. While using simple and straightforward
`FileAppender` works just
ppkarwasz commented on PR #2215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2215#issuecomment-1902786893
No, it might be relevant in the future, but right now I am closing this PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
ppkarwasz closed pull request #2215: Adds lighter v3 `Logger` interface (PoC)
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2215
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
vy commented on PR #2215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2215#issuecomment-1902763617
@ppkarwasz, given [we decided to use `log4j-api-2.x` in
`main`](https://lists.apache.org/thread/gvk0to32c13xsfz0ytczfs506svx3hxm), is
this PR still relevant for me to review?
--
vy commented on code in PR #2219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2219#discussion_r1461110865
##
src/site/asciidoc/security.adoc:
##
@@ -46,6 +46,89 @@ If you have encountered an unlisted security vulnerability
or other unexpected b
The threat model that
vy commented on code in PR #2219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2219#discussion_r1461103299
##
src/site/asciidoc/security.adoc:
##
@@ -46,6 +46,89 @@ If you have encountered an unlisted security vulnerability
or other unexpected b
The threat model that
vy commented on PR #2166:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2166#issuecomment-1902746187
@ppkarwasz thank you so much for your effort and understanding in this PR.
You also have done a great job by [introducing our agreement here as a general
policy to the Log4j
vy commented on issue #2220:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2220#issuecomment-1902745396
@jvz, the performance benefits of asynchronous loggers are extremely
subjective to the deployment environment. Putting aside Log4j team itself is
not able to reproduce [the (8
15 matches
Mail list logo