dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #116:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-samples/pull/116
Bumps
[org.springframework:spring-framework-bom](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework)
from 5.3.31 to 5.3.32.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com
swebb2066 merged PR #353:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/353
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr
vy commented on PR #2291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2291#issuecomment-1947379126
Please no enumerated naming, e.g., `log4j-spi3`.
I am fine with `log4j-sdk`. Other alternatives I can think of:
* `log4j-runtime`
* `log4j-backend`
* `log4j-kit`
* `log
garydgregory commented on PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289#issuecomment-1947341986
> LGTM
@ppkarwasz
TY for your help; merged!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
garydgregory merged PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsu
github-actions[bot] merged PR #18:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-jakarta/pull/18
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifica
ppkarwasz commented on PR #2291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2291#issuecomment-1947149631
> "SDK" implies to me something big, not an API, while "SPI" implies
something like a template to be implemented or classes to be extended.
I don't like calling things SDK
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289#discussion_r1491551371
##
log4j-jul/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/jul/test/CoreLoggerTest.java:
##
@@ -100,6 +103,35 @@ public void testSetLevel() throws Exception {
garydgregory commented on PR #2291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2291#issuecomment-1946829794
"SDK" implies to me something bigger, not an API, while "SPI" implies
something like a template to be implemented or classes to be extended.
--
This is an automated message
garydgregory commented on code in PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289#discussion_r1491423674
##
log4j-jul/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/jul/test/CoreLoggerTest.java:
##
@@ -100,6 +103,35 @@ public void testSetLevel() throws Exception {
garydgregory commented on code in PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289#discussion_r1491337669
##
log4j-jul/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/jul/test/CoreLoggerTest.java:
##
@@ -100,6 +103,35 @@ public void testSetLevel() throws Exception {
jengebr opened a new issue, #2292:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2292
## Description
Excess work is performed in CloseableThreadContext.closeMap() that shows up
as a production hotspot in our client-facing, latency-sensitive application.
Specifically, the use
ppkarwasz opened a new pull request, #2291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2291
In order for Log4j Core 3.x not to depend on the utility classes in Log4j
API 2.x, we provide a new `AbstractLogger` in `log4j-sdk`.
The main improvements to this `AbstractLogger` are:
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289#discussion_r1491229106
##
log4j-jul/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/jul/test/CoreLoggerTest.java:
##
@@ -100,6 +103,35 @@ public void testSetLevel() throws Exception {
garydgregory commented on PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289#issuecomment-1946333944
Ah, good point on the tests, I update the tests to use `isLoggable()` and
now they pass.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
ppkarwasz closed pull request #2172: Move validation constraints to
`log4j-plugins-api`
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2172
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
ppkarwasz commented on PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289#issuecomment-1946285333
Are we testing the right thing? Unless I am mistaken JUL's
[`Logger#getLevel`](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/java.logging/java/util/logging/Logger.html#getLev
ppkarwasz opened a new issue, #2290:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2290
Following the conclusion of #2273, we continue our goal of rebasing Log4j
Core 3.x on top of Log4j API 2.x. In order to do so we need to:
- [ ] Create a new `log4j-sdk` module to contain the
garydgregory commented on PR #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289#issuecomment-1946164972
Note that the new test fails... @ppkarwasz
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
garydgregory opened a new pull request, #2289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2289
Do for this module what we did for `log4j-1.2-api`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2062#discussion_r1491011916
##
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/impl/internal/InternalLoggerContext.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
github-actions[bot] merged PR #119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/119
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/119
Bumps
[org.asciidoctor:asciidoctor-maven-plugin](https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin)
from 2.2.6 to 3.0.0.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/asci
Alhalwachi-BBK opened a new issue, #112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/issues/112
After upgrading to ASP.NET core 8, the logs using the property %thread print
a generic thread name instead of the thread ID.
The commit
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/commit/
ppkarwasz commented on PR #2285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2285#issuecomment-1945549858
@dependabot rebase
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #2284: Bump io.netty:netty-bom from
4.1.106.Final to 4.1.107.Final
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2284
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
26 matches
Mail list logo
