[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue:

2019-06-17 Thread GitBox
carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/271#issuecomment-502937529 the Test failure was due to triggering rollover twice within a single interval of the smallest date component (millisecond) withou

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue:

2019-06-17 Thread GitBox
carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/271#issuecomment-502797492 @rgoers Tests all pass, I cannot reproduce the failure anymore. Thanks! --

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue:

2019-06-17 Thread GitBox
carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/271#issuecomment-502748224 I was able to reproduce this failure on a mac, so I don't think it had to do with windows. I'll give it a run and check if I can s

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue:

2019-06-16 Thread GitBox
carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/271#issuecomment-502499969 Ah, ran several more iterations and got a failure with trace enabled: https://gist.github.com/carterkozak/c6a3bc6cfc258744bb5feb8a

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue:

2019-06-16 Thread GitBox
carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/271#issuecomment-502499719 You're right, I set the status logger level too early and failed to record anything while the test was running. I was not able

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue:

2019-06-16 Thread GitBox
carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/271#issuecomment-502492251 If I set the status logger level to trace and don't register the listener, I don't see anything helpful in the log surrounding fai

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue:

2019-06-16 Thread GitBox
carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/271#issuecomment-502491851 I think we have a subtle race somewhere, when I keep `statusLogger.registerListener(this);` commented I can reproduce failures, bu

[GitHub] [logging-log4j2] carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue:

2019-06-16 Thread GitBox
carterkozak commented on issue #271: Proposed fix for LOG4J2-2610 rollover issue: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/271#issuecomment-502475511 @rgoers I've been able to get the test to fail locally with this: #277 That said there could be something odd going on with the