Re: [PR] ZOOKEEPER-4708: recreateSocketAddresses before comparing addresses [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
karthick-ponnusamy commented on PR #2041: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2041#issuecomment-2048381867 Will this be approved anytime soon? We would greatly appreciate if this was merged as our infrastructure is greatly affected by this issue -- This is an automated messa

Re: [PR] [ZOOKEEPER-4820] Fix propagation of Logback dependencies [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on PR #2155: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2155#issuecomment-2048289428 > > The meaning is pretty much up to each developer to interpret. I interpret `provided` as "we don't bundle Logback, but you **need** it for Zookeeper to run". Regarding `optional` I

Re: [PR] [ZOOKEEPER-4820] Fix propagation of Logback dependencies [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
ctubbsii commented on code in PR #2155: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2155#discussion_r1559893434 ## zookeeper-assembly/pom.xml: ## @@ -103,6 +103,10 @@ jline jline + + ch.qos.logback + logback-classic + Review Comment: B

Re: [PR] [ZOOKEEPER-4820] Fix propagation of Logback dependencies [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
ctubbsii commented on PR #2155: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2155#issuecomment-2048181083 > Personally I am not a big fan of `optional` or `provided` dependencies: their role is documentation only. It affects behavior, so I would not say it's documentation only. But e

Re: [PR] [ZOOKEEPER-4820] Fix propagation of Logback dependencies [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #2155: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2155#discussion_r1559874907 ## zookeeper-server/pom.xml: ## @@ -177,6 +169,11 @@ tools test + + ch.qos.logback + logback-classic + test + Review Com

Re: [PR] [ZOOKEEPER-4820] Fix propagation of Logback dependencies [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
ctubbsii commented on code in PR #2155: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2155#discussion_r1559857699 ## zookeeper-server/pom.xml: ## @@ -177,6 +169,11 @@ tools test + + ch.qos.logback + logback-classic + test + Review Comm

[PR] ZOOKEEPER-4824 fix CVE-2024-29025 in netty package [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
nikita15p opened a new pull request, #2156: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2156 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe,

Re: [PR] Jonmv/zookeeper 4541 take 2 [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
jonmv commented on code in PR #2154: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2154#discussion_r1559542245 ## zookeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/SendAckRequestProcessor.java: ## @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ import java.io.Flushable; import java.io.IOE

Re: [PR] ZOOKEEPER-4643, ZOOKEEPER-4646 & ZOOKEEPER-4394: Committed txns lost / NullPointerException in Learner.syncWithLeader() [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
AlphaCanisMajoris commented on PR #2152: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2152#issuecomment-2047602209 Hi, @kezhuw. thanks a lot for your careful review! I've updated the code fix in this pr. Could u please take some time to check the new commit and see if there is anything els

Re: [PR] Jonmv/zookeeper 4541 take 2 [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
AlphaCanisMajoris commented on PR #2154: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2154#issuecomment-2047539731 LGTM. > Together with #2111 and #2152, this should cover all the fixes in #1925. Yes I believe so. BTW, could u please recommit this pr, since it wasn't bu

Re: [PR] [ZOOKEEPER-4820] Fix propagation of Logback dependencies [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
ppkarwasz commented on PR #2155: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2155#issuecomment-2047451913 > maybe we can mark this dependency as runtime optional instead of test? Personally I am not a big fan of `optional` or `provided` dependencies: their role is documentation only

Re: [PR] [ZOOKEEPER-4820] Fix propagation of Logback dependencies [zookeeper]

2024-04-10 Thread via GitHub
shoothzj commented on PR #2155: URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2155#issuecomment-2046946911 maybe we can mark this dependency as runtime optional instead of test? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub