On 12/20/09 7:02 PM, James Westby wrote:
> From: Tomas Carnecky
>
> Use stat(2) instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky
> Signed-off-by: James Westby
> ---
>
>The original patch duplicated asprintf and stat calls, rearraging
>the code means we don't need to.
>
>I have a concern about
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:51:05 +0100, asjo at koldfront.dk (Adam
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson wrote:
>
> > There must be a way to tell emacs message-mode to save a copy of
> > outgoing mail locally. Mutt does this with it's Fcc commands (ie.
> >
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hi, folks. I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to save local copies of
> sent mail. I really don't think that we need to require that the mail
> actually get
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:27:04 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza
wrote:
>> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
>> config file.
>
> Yes, we definitely need that.
>
>> Actually, while we're at it, we can consider making this
On 12/22/09 3:56 AM, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> The post-add hook is run by 'notmuch new' after each new message is
added,
> post-tag is run after a tag has been added or removed. The hooks are
stored
> in the users home directory (~/.notmuch/hooks/).
>
> Since post-tag is run unconditionally ever
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:23:55 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> New functionCorresponds to existing function (if any)
> -
> move_to_first
> has_nexthas_more
> move_to_next
--- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091221/814adb6d/attachment.pgp>
The post-add hook is run by 'notmuch new' after each new message is added,
post-tag is run after a tag has been added or removed. The hooks are stored
in the users home directory (~/.notmuch/hooks/).
Since post-tag is run unconditionally every time a new tag is added or removed,
that means it is a
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:08:43 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:24:46 +0100, Ruben Pollan wrote:
> > Do you like to call them regress? Should I change that?
...
> > What about the functions notmuch_*_is_first? Is kind of reversed logic than
> > notmuch_*_has_more, the last are true
ion names are a bit long in some
cases, but I'm willing to live with that until someone comes up with
better.
Thoughts?
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not avail
On 12/20/09 7:02 PM, James Westby wrote:
From: Tomas Carnecky
Use stat(2) instead.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky
Signed-off-by: James Westby
---
The original patch duplicated asprintf and stat calls, rearraging
the code means we don't need to.
I have a concern about the duplicated st
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:21:40 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I like that you're doing a new file, separate from our current
> notmuch.el. That file has already become extremely large and unwieldy
> and needs to be broken up.
>
> But to do that, I really want to get the emacs lisp files out of the
> to
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:27:04 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza
wrote:
>> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
>> config file.
>
> Yes, we definitely need that.
>
>> Actually, while we're at it, we can consider making this
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:39:01 +0100, Adrien BUSTANY wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:27:04 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> >
> > I think we want a new C file to make it easy to ask for options out of
> > the configuration file.
>
> What about adding a way to get/set config variables from the notmuch
>
89 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091221/00b6828c/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:08:22 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> 2. of course, filenames need to be unique. Do we want/have to follow
> the maildir file naming conventions listed at
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
> or is it enough to use the Emacs lisp make-temp-file?
I'd very much prefer a real M
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:27:32 +, James Westby
wrote:
> One case that isn't handled is when we don't find the thread
> id of the parent, but then find the message itself. I believe
> this case shouldn't happen, but you never know.
It really shouldn't happen since we are holding a write l
/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091221/8c09d01a/attachment.pgp>
Hi James,
I just got to a point in my outstanding rework where I thought it would
make sense to pull this patch series in, (I'm adding support for storing
multiple filenames in a single mail document).
I took a closer look at this series, and I think it's still independent,
so I'll finish up what
ing or so. In that
thread we talked about some ideas for mitigating that. But I don't think
we need to solve that problem before applying this patch series.
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signa
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:21:40 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I like that you're doing a new file, separate from our current
> notmuch.el. That file has already become extremely large and unwieldy
> and needs to be broken up.
>
> But to do that, I really want to get the emacs lisp files out of the
> to
--- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091221/0f72b37e/attachment-0001.pgp>
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
> config file.
Yes, we definitely need that.
> Actually, while we're at it, we can consider making this
> more flexible and adding a new option to the config file (e.g.
tion/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091221/1ebf2a23/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:31:21 -0400, da...@tethera.net wrote:
> I didn't know if you (Carl) want to do copyright assignment, or just
> the GPL license headers are enough. I don't mind pretty much any
> variation.
Please feel free to retain your own copyright. I certainly don't deserve
anything bein
rubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091221/27abf78a/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 08:57:40PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> > in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to save local copies of
> > sent mail. I
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:08:22 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> 2. of course, filenames need to be unique. Do we want/have to follow
> the maildir file naming conventions listed at
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
> or is it enough to use the Emacs lisp make-temp-file?
I'd very much prefer a real M
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:51:05 +0100, a...@koldfront.dk (Adam
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson wrote:
>
> > There must be a way to tell emacs message-mode to save a copy of
> > outgoing mail locally. Mutt does this with it's Fcc commands (ie.
> > "fi
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Hi, folks. I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to save local copies of
> sent mail. I really don't think that we need to require that the mail
> actually get
30 matches
Mail list logo
