---
swig/Makefile| 18
swig/notmuch.py | 222 ++
swig/notmuch_funcs.i |9 ++
3 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 swig/Makefile
create mode 100644 swig/notmuch.py
create mode 100644
Hey all,
Here's the latest version of my patch adding SWIG interface generation to
notmuch. It has been rebased on the shared-library patches I sent over earlier
this week, so you'll need those as well. Unfortunately, SWIG has effectively no
support for exposing notmuch's C-style object-oriented
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:26:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach
> does 2 things: it requires the prefix 'date:' and it allows timestamps
> to be specified as , MM or MMDD. So a notmuch show
> date:2005..20060512 will
rlen(first_string)-1] = '\0';
+ ctime_r(, last_string);
+ last_string[strlen(last_string)-1] = '\0';
+ printf ("%s: %s - %s\n", argv[i], first_string, last_string);
+ }
+}
+}
+#endif
--
1.6.6
--
keith.packard at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/1fa59cc1/attachment-0001.pgp>
Excerpts from Simon Cozens's message of Mon Jan 25 13:17:16 -0500 2010:
> (Resent with compressed patch)
>
> Hi there,
> Here's a Perl library, Mail::Notmuch, which wraps the notmuch library.
> I've attached it because it's pretty huge. It requires you to
> build notmuch as a shared library -
Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Sat Jan 16 15:49:55 -0500 2010:
> To fascilitate this, two new functions should be implemented at the
> notmuch CLI level, so that things don't get fractured by different
> mail reader implementations:
>
> notmuch purge
>
> delete all 'delete' tagged
--- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/0c16410d/attachment.pgp>
else to say, really. Enjoy.
Simon
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mail-Notmuch-perl.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 55832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/9ee79950/attachment-0
mie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/4b013ce3/attachment.pgp>
> I think it would make sense to move the mainline to git.debian.org
> for now, or another place where everyone can easily get an account.
> As alternatives I propose repo.or.cz. I'd prefer to stay away from
> commercial services like Github.
Any of those sounds fine to me, really. No
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
> used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
> be used if people wanted flags represented in Maildir filenames.
While notmuchsync fullfils my
Sorry, very last mail from me on this issue. I squashed the patches into
3 distinct ones, and inherited a tree from cworth's master tree for
easier pulling (rather than basing it off my all-features branch). This
branch is here:
http://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature/commits/dateparser2
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:17:16 +, Simon Cozens
wrote:
> (Resent with compressed patch)
>
> Hi there,
> Here's a Perl library, Mail::Notmuch, which wraps the notmuch library.
> I've attached it because it's pretty huge. It requires you to
> build notmuch as a shared library - there's a
n/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/6a70e84f/attachment.pgp>
The patch previously sent can be considered my final attempt to a nicer
date parser. In addition to some testing, I have updated the
documentation to reflect the new syntax, and I have also added the
keyword 'now' as a possibility. So 'date:2002..now' (all mails from 2002
until now) or
=564830
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/71216e90/attachment-0001.pgp>
Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach does 2
things:
1) it requires the prefix 'date:'
2) it allows dates to be specified in a flexible way. So a notmuch show
date:2005..2006-05-12 will find all mails from 2005-01-01 until 2006-05-12.
Possible time formats:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft
> wrote:
> > I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
> > used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
> > be used if people
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.21.1928
> +1300]:
>>> I suppose that I never actually considered merges on the IMAP server
>>> side, but obviously the IMAP server has to work off a clone, and that
>>> means it needs to merge.
>>
>> It's not
The patch previously sent can be considered my final attempt to a nicer
date parser. In addition to some testing, I have updated the
documentation to reflect the new syntax, and I have also added the
keyword 'now' as a possibility. So 'date:2002..now' (all mails from 2002
until now) or
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
be used if people wanted flags represented in Maildir filenames.
While
also sprach Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de [2010.01.26.0249 +1300]:
While notmuchsync fullfils my needs, it is a kludge. It needs to
call notmuch for each mail where a MailDir flag has changed
(which can be quite often on an initial run, where most mails are
likely to be read), this can
also sprach Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org [2010.01.23.1010 +1300]:
Anyway, I'll be on vacation for the next few days, so will likely
not have much, (likely have not much?), time for patch merging.
But I *am* anxious to get back to the backlog. And in the
meantime, I really appreciate others
Excerpts from Simon Cozens's message of Mon Jan 25 13:17:16 -0500 2010:
(Resent with compressed patch)
Hi there,
Here's a Perl library, Mail::Notmuch, which wraps the notmuch library.
I've attached it because it's pretty huge. It requires you to
build notmuch as a shared library -
---
swig/Makefile| 18
swig/notmuch.py | 222 ++
swig/notmuch_funcs.i |9 ++
3 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 swig/Makefile
create mode 100644 swig/notmuch.py
create mode 100644
Inger in #notmuch brought to light some build issues that will occur when the
notmuch binary is being built before libnotmuch is installed. Here is an
updated patch that resolves these issues.
---
.gitignore |1 +
Makefile |1 +
Makefile.local |6 --
26 matches
Mail list logo
