also sprach Ben Gamari [2010.02.18.1810 +1300]:
> Yeah, this is a bit of a bummer. This is really a stretch, but I wonder
> if the git folks would accept patches/minor database semantics changes
> in the name of making git more flexible as a general purpose object
> database. I really doubt it, bu
ment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/5e2c1006/attachment.pgp>
re (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/bb928ed1/attachment.pgp>
notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/f74dc6f1/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:11:24 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:51:00 +, James Westby jameswestby.net> wrote:
> > Some people send html parts as text/HTML or similar, so do a
> > case-sensitive comparison when checking for html parts.
>
> There are various other places wh
-- oscar wilde
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmai
also sprach ra...@free.fr [2010.02.18.2134 +1300]:
> I don't understand the problem. Why not just letting all "inbox"
> mails in a regular Maildir, and use git only when they have been
> explicit archived?
I don't archive my mail. I would like to be able to bring mails from
the past back into cir
u think, and they are out to get you.
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmu
scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/515dec5b/attachment.pgp>
chment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/9969da7e/attachment.pgp>
pplication/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/a4df7391/attachment.pgp>
This, and any other patches that I'm using, are now in a repository at
git://gitorious.org/notmuch/notmuch.git
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:21:01 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> What I am wondering is if (explicit) tags couldn't be represented as
> tree-objects with this.
>
> evenless-link ? link a message object with a tree object
> evenless?unlink ? unlink a message object from tree object
> [repla
-cl.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 11289 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/838974e6/attachment.patch>
-- next part --
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
- "martin f krafft" a ?crit :
> Except I fear that as soon as we allow manipulation of the local
> store, we'll potentially run into this problem:
>
> http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/001114.html
> id:20100112045152.GA15275 at lapse.rw.madduck.net
I don't understand the pr
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:11:24 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:51:00 +, James Westby
> wrote:
> > Some people send html parts as text/HTML or similar, so do a
> > case-sensitive comparison when checking for html parts.
>
> There are various other places where `equal' is
Excerpts from racin's message of Thu Feb 18 03:34:28 -0500 2010:
>
> - "martin f krafft" a ?crit :
>
> > Except I fear that as soon as we allow manipulation of the local
> > store, we'll potentially run into this problem:
> >
> > http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/001114.html
>
ed any deletion phase, using git sounds much more sensible.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/4937e011/attachment.pgp>
Excerpts from racin's message of Thu Feb 18 03:34:28 -0500 2010:
>
> - "martin f krafft" a écrit :
>
> > Except I fear that as soon as we allow manipulation of the local
> > store, we'll potentially run into this problem:
> >
> > http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/001114.html
>
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:34:28 +0100 (CET), ra...@free.fr wrote:
> I don't understand the problem. Why not just letting all "inbox" mails in a
> regular Maildir,
> and use git only when they have been explicit archived? This way, mails are
> added to git only if we want
> to save them, and we rare
This, and any other patches that I'm using, are now in a repository at
git://gitorious.org/notmuch/notmuch.git
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:04:12 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> In-lining every possible body cleaning function is difficult to
> maintain and doesn't allow users any flexibility. Rather, use a hook
> mechanism so that users can choose what cleaning takes place.
Improved version attached, including
- "martin f krafft" a écrit :
> Except I fear that as soon as we allow manipulation of the local
> store, we'll potentially run into this problem:
>
> http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/001114.html
> id:20100112045152.ga15...@lapse.rw.madduck.net
I don't understand the probl
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Wed Feb 17 23:59:43 -0500 2010:
> also sprach Ben Gamari [2010.02.18.1744 +1300]:
> > I believe you would. The problem isn't the messages (well, that's
> > a problem too), it's the fact that the tree (e.g. tab) objects
> > which reference the messages are
24 matches
Mail list logo
