[PATCH] patchformatting: Test Suite Enhancements

Based on the emails starting at id:"87liu2kcq6.fsf at servo.factory.finestructure.net". --- Hi! I applied the attached patch, based on this thread's discussion. Gr??e, Thomas --- patchformatting.mdwn | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH, v2] notmuch restore --accumulate

From: Thomas Schwinge The --accumulate switch causes the union of the existing and new tags to be applied, instead of replacing each message's tags as they are read in from the dump file. --- Hi! Beware that I have not yet used this new functionality in the wild. ;-)

[PATCH, v2] notmuch restore --accumulate

From: Thomas Schwinge Flesh out what ``notmuch restore --accumulate'' is supposed to do. Its tests are currently XFAILed; the functionality will be added in another patch. Also generally enhance the dump-restore testsuite, and make it more failure-proof. ---

[Justus Winter] Re: [PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel one

29 Sep 2011 12:37:53 +0200 Size: 5902 URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110929/9361db8c/attachment.mht> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not a

Concerns regarding some library functions

On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:51:29 -0400, Austin Clements wrote: > Yes. We could just deal with that (there aren't *that* many API > consumers). For binary compatibility, I suppose we could even use > symbol versioning. I noticed a similar remark in lib/Makefile.local. But I'm not sure how this

Concerns regarding some library functions

Quoth David Bremner on Sep 29 at 4:59 pm: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:51:29 -0400, Austin Clements > wrote: > > > Yes. We could just deal with that (there aren't *that* many API > > consumers). For binary compatibility, I suppose we could even use > > symbol versioning. > > I noticed a similar

emacs email appears empty

On 29 September 2011 11:21, Brian May wrote: > Have seen several cases now where the message appears blank in the > emacs interface. With nothing but the headers. > > Pushing Shift+V shows the entire raw message. Nothing special, just a > plain text email without any attachments. Also replying

emacs email appears empty

Hello, Have seen several cases now where the message appears blank in the emacs interface. With nothing but the headers. Pushing Shift+V shows the entire raw message. Nothing special, just a plain text email without any attachments. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Python bindings doc update

: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110929/e0fe26d6/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH v6 00/17] Fix 'notmuch new' atomicity issues

Quoth Sebastian Spaeth on Sep 28 at 6:36 pm: > On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:04:26 -0400, Austin Clements > wrote: > > Here's the reworked patch series that uses atomic sections more > > heavily rather than changing the removal API. This is atomic-new-v6 > > on

[PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel one

-- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110929/2d9e46e8/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel one

ize: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110929/a021705f/attachment.pgp>

emacs email appears empty

On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:21:21 +1000, Brian May wrote: > Hello, > > Have seen several cases now where the message appears blank in the > emacs interface. With nothing but the headers. > > Pushing Shift+V shows the entire raw message. Nothing special, just a > plain text email without any

Re: [PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel one

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:05:29 +0200, Justus Winter wrote: #1) APPLIED #2) APPLIED #3) reorder the arguments of NotmuchError.__init__(): NOT APPLIED The python tutorial gives an example of custom TransitionError with three arguments, a custom message as the third. In addition, a STATUS value is

Python bindings doc update

Online docs for current master are updated and as usual online at: http://packages.python.org/notmuch/ Besides some prettifications, the three new functions have been documented. Sebastian pgpOCB1wrCQOh.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch

Re: emacs email appears empty

On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:21:21 +1000, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote: Hello, Have seen several cases now where the message appears blank in the emacs interface. With nothing but the headers. Pushing Shift+V shows the entire raw message. Nothing special, just a plain text

Re: emacs email appears empty

Quoting David Bremner (2011-09-29 12:05:37) On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:21:21 +1000, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote: Hello, Have seen several cases now where the message appears blank in the emacs interface. With nothing but the headers. Pushing Shift+V shows the entire raw

Re: emacs email appears empty

On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:57:37 +0100, Patrick Totzke patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed Quoting David Bremner (2011-09-29 12:05:37) On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:21:21 +1000, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote: Hello, Have seen several cases now

Re: Concerns regarding some library functions

Quoth Ali Polatel on Sep 28 at 10:53 am: On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:46:22 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: Quoth David Bremner on Sep 27 at 1:59 pm: On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:25:58 +0300, Ali Polatel pola...@gmail.com wrote: The problem with their design is NULL return may

Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] Fix 'notmuch new' atomicity issues

Quoth Sebastian Spaeth on Sep 28 at 6:36 pm: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:04:26 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: Here's the reworked patch series that uses atomic sections more heavily rather than changing the removal API. This is atomic-new-v6 on

[Justus Winter] Re: [PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel one

Here goes Justus's reply which he accidentally sent to me only. ---BeginMessage--- Hey Sebastian, Quoting Sebastian Spaeth (2011-09-29 09:45:38) On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:05:29 +0200, Justus Winter wrote: #1) APPLIED #2) APPLIED #4) APPLIED #5#6) APPLIED #9) APPLIED Thanks for the patches, most

[PATCH, v2] notmuch restore --accumulate

From: Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name Flesh out what ``notmuch restore --accumulate'' is supposed to do. Its tests are currently XFAILed; the functionality will be added in another patch. Also generally enhance the dump-restore testsuite, and make it more failure-proof. ---

[PATCH, v2] notmuch restore --accumulate

From: Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name The --accumulate switch causes the union of the existing and new tags to be applied, instead of replacing each message's tags as they are read in from the dump file. --- Hi! Beware that I have not yet used this new functionality in the wild. ;-) (But

[PATCH] patchformatting: Test Suite Enhancements

Based on the emails starting at id:87liu2kcq6@servo.factory.finestructure.net. --- Hi! I applied the attached patch, based on this thread's discussion. Grüße, Thomas --- patchformatting.mdwn | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: Concerns regarding some library functions

On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:51:29 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: Yes. We could just deal with that (there aren't *that* many API consumers). For binary compatibility, I suppose we could even use symbol versioning. I noticed a similar remark in lib/Makefile.local. But I'm not sure

Re: Concerns regarding some library functions

Quoth David Bremner on Sep 29 at 4:59 pm: On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:51:29 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: Yes. We could just deal with that (there aren't *that* many API consumers). For binary compatibility, I suppose we could even use symbol versioning. I noticed a

[PATCH] Repeatability when copying a whole directory into a new one.

This new test currently fails -- but it shouldn't. --- Hi! I found this while manually copying directories and running notmuch new. Am I just too sleepy at this time, or is it another DB vs. directory mtime issue? BROKEN Repeatability when copying a whole directory into a new one

Re: [PATCH 1/9] python: add a .gitignore file and refine the toplevel one

Hi Sebastian, Quoting Sebastian Spaeth (2011-09-29 09:45:38) Also, not all status are an error, e.g. DuplicateMessageId denotes success rather than failure, it just communicates a status. I just stumbled upon the following comment in notmuch.h: /* Status codes used for the return values of

[PATCH] python: fix docstring of Message.get_header()

Update the docstring from notmuch.h. Signed-off-by: Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de --- bindings/python/notmuch/message.py | 13 +++-- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/bindings/python/notmuch/message.py b/bindings/python/notmuch/message.py