On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:24:11 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:00:21 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > Understood. For me this fell inside the 'trivial other change' boundary.
>
> Fwiw, I don't remember there ever being such a distinction. I think
> we've always insi
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:38:35 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:24:42 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > Clicking on the button for the part saves the wrong thing, though,
> > > because it's not a real MIME part. That looks a bit awkward to fix, so
> > > perhaps you could s
oine Amarilli
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/ebacd852/attachment.pgp>
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/bb7d9634/attachment.pgp>
`notmuch-search' than
to run `notmuch' and then click on the "search" button.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/41e4f998/attachment.pgp>
al, I suppose) with two smaller patches than
> with a single bigger one.
Your git-fu is obviously much stronger than mine. :-) Rebasing (groups
of) patches takes more of my time and is more error prone than I'd like.
-- next part ------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/4be94e66/attachment.pgp>
re
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/4266bec4/attachment.pgp>
---
NEWS | 16
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index eaed960..0d88258 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -11,6 +11,22 @@ Hooks
supports "pre-new" and "post-new" hooks that are run before and after
importing new messages into the dat
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:08 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> I think what you've done looks great. A couple small issues:
>
> * There are a couple of formatting issues (notmuch.1, notmuch-config.1,
> notmuch-reply.1).
Hopefully I caught most of the formatting issues.
>
> * The notmu
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:38:59 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> ---
> NEWS | 16
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
Pushed to
git://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch release
and
pivot.cs.unb.ca:pub/git news
Hi David.
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:46:13 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:01:33 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > * Revert changes to notmuch-show-advance-and-archive.
>
> Why? (I mean, because the change is poor or just that it's unrelated or
> because I didn't
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:58:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> > with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
> > minibuffer as us
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:02:55 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> It's also simpler to have a global keybinding for `notmuch-search' than
> to run `notmuch' and then click on the "search" button.
We actually have that everywhere else *but* notmuch-hello; notmuch-hello
is actually the odd man out in th
scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/05115939/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:06:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:05 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > +(defun notmuch-wash-subject-to-patch-filename (subject)
> > + "Convert a patch mail SUBJECT into a filename.
> > +
> > +The resulting filename is similar to the names generate
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:00:21 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Understood. For me this fell inside the 'trivial other change' boundary.
Fwiw, I don't remember there ever being such a distinction. I think
we've always insisted that unrelated changes should be excluded. As a
general rule, I think a
ruction is definitely cleaner.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/374961f1/attachment-0001.pgp>
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:10:13PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:34:23 +0100, Olivier Schwander
> wrote:
> > Is there a somewhere a list of the various notmuch frontend ? It would
> > be very valuable for people who are not completly happy with the main
> > emacs frontend.
>
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:52:23 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Below is an idea I came up with, utilizing the content-type
> vs. declared-type distinction. I think it's really simple and neat,
> but I hope not too magical.
>
> Picking up an example mail from the list, inline patches would show up
> lik
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:02:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:58:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > wrote:
> > > I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> > > with a button wich woul
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:09:55 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Hi David.
>
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:46:13 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:01:33 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > wrote:
> > > * Revert changes to notmuch-show-advance-and-archive.
> >
> > Why? (I mean, because
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:38:35 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:24:42 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > Clicking on the button for the part saves the wrong thing, though,
> > > because it's not a real MIME part. That looks a bit awkward to fix, so
> > > perhaps you could
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:24:42 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Clicking on the button for the part saves the wrong thing, though,
> > because it's not a real MIME part. That looks a bit awkward to fix, so
> > perhaps you could still prefix the name with "inline: " to indicate that
> > it's odd?
>
> I
to behave as expected.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/de0627d1/attachment.pgp>
bed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/d30f7c14/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:38:59 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> ---
> NEWS | 16
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
Pushed to
git://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch release
and
pivot.cs.unb.ca:pub/git news
errors?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/0a3369b3/attachment.pgp>
application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/fc3a6a4f/attachment.pgp>
c - just wonder
which is more useful behaviour.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/f773610f/attachment.pgp>
l behaviour?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/38861c7c/attachment.pgp>
/notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/a74e36ef/attachment.pgp>
did you have this problem with?
23.3.1
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 50notmuch.el
Type: application/emacs-lisp
Size: 1274 bytes
Desc: site startup for notmuch.
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111226/0308f83a/attachment.bin>
---
NEWS | 16
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index eaed960..0d88258 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -11,6 +11,22 @@ Hooks
supports "pre-new" and "post-new" hooks that are run before and after
importing new messages into the dat
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:06:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:05 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > +(defun notmuch-wash-subject-to-patch-filename (subject)
> > + "Convert a patch mail SUBJECT into a filename.
> > +
> > +The resulting filename is similar to the names generate
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:05 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> +(defun notmuch-wash-subject-to-patch-filename (subject)
> + "Convert a patch mail SUBJECT into a filename.
> +
> +The resulting filename is similar to the names generated by \"git
> +format-patch\". If the patch mail was generated and sent
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:46:19 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Dec 10 at 3:43 pm:
> > On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:54:27 -0500, Austin Clements
> > wrote:
> > > This function matches how we number parts for the --part argument to
> > > show. It will allow us to jump directly
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:54:41 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> I just tried, and I cannot reproduce this behavior. IIUC, here is what
> happened to you: you set nm-mua-compose-in to 'new-window. You began a
> new message, this opened a new window as expected. Your emacs frame now
> has two windows in
All looks good to me. Let's push it.
I have some minor comments, but they are all more of a style preference
(e.g. sig_validity vs signature_validity, using conditional operator (x
? y : z) where possible).
Regards,
Dmitry
Hi David.
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:46:13 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:01:33 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > * Revert changes to notmuch-show-advance-and-archive.
>
> Why? (I mean, because the change is poor or just that it's unrelated or
> because I didn't mention
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:58:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> > with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
> > minibuffer as usual. Th
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:55:57 -0700, Tom Prince wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:06:50 +0100, Thomas Jost wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> Non-text part: multipart/signed
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:20:04 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > Cast away the result of various *write functions.
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
> minibuffer as usual. This way we do not have to maintain 2 search
> interfaces and get histor
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:11:27 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> > > + ((> (let ((visible-bottom (notmuch-show-message-bottom)))
> > > + (while (invisible-p visible-bottom)
> > > +(setq visible-bottom (max (point-min)
> > > + (1- (previous-single-char-property-change
> >
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:06:35 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Awesome. This looks significantly cleaner. I think this is worth
> pushing for the comment you added to notmuch-show-advance alone.
Thanks.
> This definitely changes the behavior of rewind, but other than one
> case I point out below
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:01:33 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> * Revert changes to notmuch-show-advance-and-archive.
Why? (I mean, because the change is poor or just that it's unrelated or
because I didn't mention it)
> * Can we split this in two patches? One for rewind and another for
> adva
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
test/emacs-subject-to-filename | 138
test/notmuch-test |1 +
2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 test/emacs-subject-to-filename
diff --git a/test/emacs-subject-to-filenam
Use the mail subject line for creating a descriptive filename for the wash
generated inline patch fake parts. The names are similar to the ones
created by 'git format-patch'.
If the user has notmuch-wash-convert-inline-patch-to-part hook enabled in
notmuch-show-insert-text/plain-hook, this will ch
Hi all, v2 with the following changes:
* split the conversion function into three
* figure out patch sequence number from the [PATCH N/M] style prefixes
* write a bunch of tests for the functions
* update the regexps according to bugs found in tests :)
BR,
Jani.
Jani Nikula (2):
emacs: create
48 matches
Mail list logo
