Hi Adam.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:27:29 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 00:22, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> >> Reply now enforces that only one message is returned, as the semantics
> >> of replying to multiple messages are not wel-defined.
> >
> > s/wel/well
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:46:02 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Make notmuch-show-all-multipart/alternative-parts accept a list of
> regexps to match the part types to determine which parts to show in
> addition to the preferred types. This allows the user to force display
> some alternative part types w
Looks good.
pgpTxJOJe1ggB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:05:46 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:46:02 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Make notmuch-show-all-multipart/alternative-parts accept a list of
> > regexps to match the part types to determine which parts to show in
> > addition to the preferred types. T
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:20:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> libgmime-2.6-dev entered debian unstable today. If 2.6 is available,
> notmuch should build against 2.6 instead of 2.4, as 2.6 is the current
> upstream stable version of libgmime.
Hi Daniel;
I'm not necessarily opposed to migrat
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 21:57:20 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> v2 addressing Austin's comments in id:"20120206041205.gp10...@mit.edu".
> Separate the bool cleanup into a new patch, cleaning up notmuch reply
> while at it. No functional changes since v1.
>
> For reviewing convenience, the
On 02/10/2012 08:15 AM, David Bremner wrote:
> I'm not necessarily opposed to migrating to the Debian packages to gmime
> 2.6, but I'd like to point out that your patch is might be more decisive
> than intended, since the build daemons strip all but the first
> dependency. This will cause the build
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:54:07 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> You could (also) check this (or some other with same name)
>
> https://github.com/altruizine/gnus-alias/blob/master/gnus-alias.el
Thanks for the link, but this method is interactive. I want something
automatic. Nevertheless a nice thing t
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:15:53 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:20:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
> > libgmime-2.6-dev entered debian unstable today. If 2.6 is available,
> > notmuch should build against 2.6 instead of 2.4, as 2.6 is the current
> > upstream stable ver
On 02/10/2012 03:57 PM, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> For the time being, should the order be:
>
> - libgmime-2.4-dev,
> + libgmime-2.4-dev | libgmime-2.6-dev,
2.6 is available and functional in unstable. I think we should prefer 2.6.
This will enable (and encourage) us to approach S/MIME support too
(w
I have recently switched from using mutt + maildir-utils (mu) for searching
my email to using mutt + notmuch. I made use of the mutt-notmuch perl script
by Stefano Zacchiroli to integrate mutt and notmuch. You can find it at:
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2011/01/how_to_use_Notmuch_with_Mutt
> Yeah, I think this is the point: you want "*@mydomain.org" to be one of
> the user.other_email. I don't see why that couldn't be done with a
> little work in notmuch-reply.c. I wouldn't mind seeing this
> functionality as well, actually.
So here's my shabby solution (pasted from my .emacs):
;
Simon Campese
writes:
> I would like to implement the following behaviour: When replying to a
> mail that has "something-3q2tfjf0mexg9huczpv...@public.gmane.org" in the
> "To"-header, I would like
> to have the "From"-header of the reply to be automatically set to this
> address.
message-alter
Either I have the search syntax wrong or there's a bug somewhere. Is this
not how to combine multiple tags? The output of the first invocation shows
that there exist threads tagged both inbox and unread, but the second
invocation does not find them.
- Bhaskara
$ notmuch search $(date +%s -d 2012
What you'll probably find is that, of the messages in those threads,
some match tag:inbox, and some match tag:unread, but none match both.
Notmuch's search returns threads that have matching messages, not
matching threads.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 23:37, Bhaskara Marthi wrote:
> Either I have the
Hi Adam.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:27:29 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 00:22, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> >> Reply now enforces that only one message is returned, as the semantics
> >> of replying to multiple messages are not wel-defined.
> >
> > s/wel/wel
t-get inner-part :id)
> inner-type inner-type nil " (not shown)"
> inner-parts)
> --
> 1.7.1
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120210/4b01ed8e/attachment.pgp>
Looks good.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120210/d8fb282f/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:05:46 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:46:02 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Make notmuch-show-all-multipart/alternative-parts accept a list of
> > regexps to match the part types to determine which parts to show in
> > addition to the preferred types. T
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:20:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> libgmime-2.6-dev entered debian unstable today. If 2.6 is available,
> notmuch should build against 2.6 instead of 2.4, as 2.6 is the current
> upstream stable version of libgmime.
Hi Daniel;
I'm not necessarily opposed to migrati
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 21:57:20 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> v2 addressing Austin's comments in id:"20120206041205.GP10898 at mit.edu".
> Separate the bool cleanup into a new patch, cleaning up notmuch reply
> while at it. No functional changes since v1.
>
> For reviewing convenience, t
On 02/10/2012 08:15 AM, David Bremner wrote:
> I'm not necessarily opposed to migrating to the Debian packages to gmime
> 2.6, but I'd like to point out that your patch is might be more decisive
> than intended, since the build daemons strip all but the first
> dependency. This will cause the build
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:54:07 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> You could (also) check this (or some other with same name)
>
> https://github.com/altruizine/gnus-alias/blob/master/gnus-alias.el
Thanks for the link, but this method is interactive. I want something
automatic. Nevertheless a nice thing t
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:15:53 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:20:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> > libgmime-2.6-dev entered debian unstable today. If 2.6 is available,
> > notmuch should build against 2.6 instead of 2.4, as 2.6 is the current
> > ups
On 02/10/2012 03:57 PM, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> For the time being, should the order be:
>
> - libgmime-2.4-dev,
> + libgmime-2.4-dev | libgmime-2.6-dev,
2.6 is available and functional in unstable. I think we should prefer 2.6.
This will enable (and encourage) us to approach S/MIME support too
(w
I have recently switched from using mutt + maildir-utils (mu) for searching
my email to using mutt + notmuch. I made use of the mutt-notmuch perl script
by Stefano Zacchiroli to integrate mutt and notmuch. You can find it at:
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2011/01/how_to_use_Notmuch_with_Mutt
Simon Campese
writes:
> I would like to implement the following behaviour: When replying to a
> mail that has "something-3Q2Tfjf0mexg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org" in the
> "To"-header, I would like
> to have the "From"-header of the reply to be automatically set to this
> address.
message-al
$ notmuch search tag:inbox and tag:unread
$
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120210/e93912c5/attachment.html>
What you'll probably find is that, of the messages in those threads,
some match tag:inbox, and some match tag:unread, but none match both.
Notmuch's search returns threads that have matching messages, not
matching threads.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 23:37, Bhaskara Marthi wrote:
> Either I have the
Just posting to the right place ;)
Sorry.
-- next part --
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Philippe LeCavalier
Subject: default search sort order
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:37:07 -0500
Size: 585
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120
30 matches
Mail list logo
