On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:34:55 -0400, Robert Horn wrote:
> Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to
> set initial tags for messages using notmuch?
Can you express your initial tags in terms of notmuch searches? If you
can, I'd use the post-new hook of 'notmuch new' to d
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Karl Harris wrote:
> I am trying the notmuch-vim-ruby plugin for the first time. Previously, I
> had been using the vim plugin that comes with notmuch.
>
> If I type :NotMuchR in vim, I get the following error messages:
> --
> Error detected while
I was wondering if there were any plans to add a "mark" feature. By
hitting some keybinding, one could mark some set of mails and then apply
operations to them as a batch. This would be often useful for me for, for
example, tagging all mails matching a search except some. If there were a
way to
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 19:34 -0400, Robert Horn wrote:
> Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to
> set initial tags for messages using notmuch?
>
> I've just started using emacs-notmuch to read mail, and I'm using a
> system where I have procmail filters to bin mail by
On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:14:50 +0100, bryan hunt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 19:34 -0400, Robert Horn wrote:
> > Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to
> > set initial tags for messages using notmuch?
> >
> > I've just started using emacs-notmuch to read mail, and
Austin Clements writes:
> This version moves a Python bindings change that had slipped into the
> Go patch into the Python patch and words the future-proofing warning
> on notmuch_database_get_directory more strongly. There are no code
> changes from v1.
Pushed to master, for now. Assuming no
Quoth Robert Horn on May 14 at 7:34 pm:
> Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to
> set initial tags for messages using notmuch?
>
> I've just started using emacs-notmuch to read mail, and I'm using a
> system where I have procmail filters to bin mail by category int
On Tue, May 15 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you can have procmail record the message ID and desired
> tags of the message in a file and then apply those recorded tags in
> your post-new hook. This would achieve the tagging you want more
> directly, without mixing in folders an
2012/5/13 Austin Clements :
> Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at 8:12 pm:
>> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
>> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
>> keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
>> t
On Tue, May 15 2012, Ali Polatel wrote:
> 2012/5/13 Austin Clements :
>> Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at .8:12 pm:
>>> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
>>> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
>>> keyword always allocates ne
This is fairly important to mention, since it represents a user
interface change.
---
Sorry about it being late!
NEWS | 14 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index f987811..69a7203 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ JSON reply f
On Mon, May 14 2012, Pavel Panchekha wrote:
> I was wondering if there were any plans to add a "mark" feature. By
> hitting some keybinding, one could mark some set of mails and then apply
> operations to them as a batch. This would be often useful for me for, for
> example, tagging all mails ma
IT häppens.
Attempting to reply to this email should expose the problem.
Ääliö älä lyö, ööliä läikkyy.
--
Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, May 15 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> IT häppens.
>
> Attempting to reply to this email should expose the problem.
>
> Ääliö älä lyö, ööliä läikkyy.
This email: id:"20120515194455.b7ad5100...@guru.guru-group.fi"
was supposed to be reply to email id:"878vgzrvik@beesknees.cern.ch"
I (onc
Where to obtain notmuch 0.13
===
http://notmuchmail.org/releases/notmuch-0.13.tar.gz
Which can be verified with:
http://notmuchmail.org/releases/notmuch-0.13.tar.gz.sha1
c65bd28b2091c81720e6f4e685892b919a7aa581 notmuch-0.13.tar.gz
http://notmuchmail.org/releases
Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
> This is fairly important to mention, since it represents a user
> interface change.
Pushed, even though you were naughty and snuck in an unrelated spelling
correction ;).
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.o
---
NEWS |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index d841a4c..8a73e08 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Notmuch 0.13 (2012-xx-xx)
+Notmuch 0.13 (2012-05-15)
=
Command-Line Interface
--
1.7.1
_
NEWS entries in section 0.13 is brought consistent with rest of the
NEWS file.
---
NEWS | 38 +++---
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 69a7203..d841a4c 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -6,19 +6,19 @@ Command-Line Int
Align 'Go bindings changes' title capitalization to rest of the file
---
NEWS |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 8a73e08..4978261 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ The function `notmuch_database_close` has been split into
f
Tomi Ollila writes:
> IT häppens.
>
> Attempting to reply to this email should expose the problem.
>
> Ääliö älä lyö, ööliä läikkyy.
The problem bisected to f6c170fabca8f39e74705e3813504137811bf162
("emacs: Correctly quote non-text/plain parts in reply"). The commit
reverts cleanly, replying with
On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:34:55 -0400, Robert Horn wrote:
> Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to
> set initial tags for messages using notmuch?
Can you express your initial tags in terms of notmuch searches? If you
can, I'd use the post-new hook of 'notmuch new' to d
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Karl Harris wrote:
> I am trying the notmuch-vim-ruby plugin for the first time.? Previously, I
> had been using the vim plugin that comes with notmuch.
>
> If I type :NotMuchR in vim, I get the following error messages:
> --
> Error detected while
e a
way to mark ranges, this would also make the syntax of date searches less
painful.
- Pavel Panchekha
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120515/9a4e5ca8/attachment.html>
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 19:34 -0400, Robert Horn wrote:
> Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to
> set initial tags for messages using notmuch?
>
> I've just started using emacs-notmuch to read mail, and I'm using a
> system where I have procmail filters to bin mail by
On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:14:50 +0100, bryan hunt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 19:34 -0400, Robert Horn wrote:
> > Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to
> > set initial tags for messages using notmuch?
> >
> > I've just started using emacs-notmuch to read mail, and
Austin Clements writes:
> This version moves a Python bindings change that had slipped into the
> Go patch into the Python patch and words the future-proofing warning
> on notmuch_database_get_directory more strongly. There are no code
> changes from v1.
Pushed to master, for now. Assuming no
Quoth Robert Horn on May 14 at 7:34 pm:
> Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to
> set initial tags for messages using notmuch?
>
> I've just started using emacs-notmuch to read mail, and I'm using a
> system where I have procmail filters to bin mail by category int
On Tue, May 15 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you can have procmail record the message ID and desired
> tags of the message in a file and then apply those recorded tags in
> your post-new hook. This would achieve the tagging you want more
> directly, without mixing in folders an
2012/5/13 Austin Clements :
> Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at ?8:12 pm:
>> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
>> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
>> keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
>> t
On Tue, May 15 2012, Ali Polatel wrote:
> 2012/5/13 Austin Clements :
>> Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 10 at .8:12 pm:
>>> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
>>> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
>>> keyword always allocates ne
This is fairly important to mention, since it represents a user
interface change.
---
Sorry about it being late!
NEWS | 14 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index f987811..69a7203 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ JSON reply f
require 0.13 (which is not
released yet).
hth.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120515/7fdbdb7a/attachment.pgp>
IT h?ppens.
Attempting to reply to this email should expose the problem.
??li? ?l? ly?, ??li? l?ikkyy.
--
Tomi
On Tue, May 15 2012, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> IT h?ppens.
>
> Attempting to reply to this email should expose the problem.
>
> ??li? ?l? ly?, ??li? l?ikkyy.
This email: id:"20120515194455.B7AD5100646 at guru.guru-group.fi"
was supposed to be reply to email id:"878vgzrvik.fsf at beesknees.cern.ch"
format. It uses
the Xapian library to provide fast, full-text search with a convenient
search syntax.
For more about notmuch, see http://notmuchmail.org
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120515/2bacca90/attachment.pgp>
Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
> This is fairly important to mention, since it represents a user
> interface change.
Pushed, even though you were naughty and snuck in an unrelated spelling
correction ;).
d
36 matches
Mail list logo
