[PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Mark Walters
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Mark Walters wrote: >> On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements wrote: >>> This version swaps out the notmuch-search-do-results macro for a >>> higher-order function, notmuch-search-foreach-result. This requires >>> less squiting

[PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Mark Walters
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements wrote: > This version swaps out the notmuch-search-do-results macro for a > higher-order function, notmuch-search-foreach-result. This requires > less squiting to understand and clearly distinguishes the arguments > passed in to the function from the

[PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
also be really long. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120715/098430ae/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Austin Clements
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Mark Walters wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements wrote: >> This version swaps out the notmuch-search-do-results macro for a >> higher-order function, notmuch-search-foreach-result. This requires >> less squiting to understand and clearly distinguishes the

Notmuch scripts (again), now with more usenet

2012-07-15 Thread David Bremner
ccx at webprojekty.cz writes: > I hope it's now in the form acceptable for inclusion to contrib. Dear Jan; Without looking too much at the details I think this is reasonable to include in contrib, as a set of examples if nothing else. Still, I'm curious about a few things. Are there actual

[PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Mark Walters
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements wrote: > This version swaps out the notmuch-search-do-results macro for a > higher-order function, notmuch-search-foreach-result. This requires > less squiting to understand and clearly distinguishes the arguments > passed in to the function from the

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Mark Walters
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: This version swaps out the notmuch-search-do-results macro for a higher-order function, notmuch-search-foreach-result. This requires less squiting to understand and clearly distinguishes the arguments passed in to the function from

Re: Notmuch scripts (again), now with more usenet

2012-07-15 Thread David Bremner
c...@webprojekty.cz writes: I hope it's now in the form acceptable for inclusion to contrib. Dear Jan; Without looking too much at the details I think this is reasonable to include in contrib, as a set of examples if nothing else. Still, I'm curious about a few things. Are there actual users

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Austin Clements
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: This version swaps out the notmuch-search-do-results macro for a higher-order function, notmuch-search-foreach-result. This requires less squiting to understand and

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Mark Walters
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: This version swaps out the notmuch-search-do-results macro for a higher-order function,

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] emacs: JSON-based search cleanups

2012-07-15 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Sun, Jul 15 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote: However, there are some problems with multiline search results (see below) so I think we should either fix these or just downplay this new functionality by, for example, removing the comments on newlines from the defcustom and

Re: Notmuch scripts (again), now with more usenet

2012-07-15 Thread Daniel Schoepe
On Sun, 15.07.2012 18:36, David Bremner wrote: Are there actual users (other than the author)? I started using the slrn2maildir script yesterday, but none of the other scripts. It's working fine so far. Cheers, Daniel pgpnnUpoMefpM.pgp Description: PGP signature