On 13-02-13 02:35pm, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> A more likely idea is to check whether you have $pipe_decode set.
> If you have this set, you need to make sure you are not weeding out
> message-id with 'ignore'.
>
> In fact, I've just tried this, and I can replicate the problem and exact
> error m
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> The code LGTM. Is there any quoting differences between these 2
> tagging methods ?
>
That's a good point. I added quoting easily enough, but as soon as I
did, I discovered the rest of nmbug has some issues with tags with
spaces in them. I'll see how hard this is to fix
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:09:22 +0100, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
>> I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the
>> headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)
>> satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like
>> headers:"List-Id: b
n Archlinux.
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20130213/322273b2/attachment.pgp>
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> The code LGTM. Is there any quoting differences between these 2
> tagging methods ?
>
That's a good point. I added quoting easily enough, but as soon as I
did, I discovered the rest of nmbug has some issues with tags with
spaces in them. I'll see how hard this is to fix
[ please keep the notmuch@ list in Cc:, so that others could help and/or
benefit from the solution ... when we find one :-) ]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:51:05PM +0100, Profpatsch wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but I still don't get it. What do you mean with "no mail"?
>
> Haha, sorry, that was misleadin
On Sat, Feb 09 2013, david at tethera.net wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> In the case of large changes to the database from git, one of main
> current bottlenecks is the large number of execs of notmuch tag. This
> avoids that by using use the batch tagging facilities as of notmuch
> 0.15.
>
> W
Using char instead of int allows for simpler definitions of the
DOCIDSET macros so the code is easier to understand and consistent with
respect to memory-usage. Estimated reduction of memory-usage for
bitmap about 8 times.
---
Re-submission for comment-reasons.
---
---
lib/query.cc | 10 +
Somehow my comments don't get through... I'll try it another way.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Robert Mast [mailto:beheerder at tekenbeetziekten.nl]
Verzonden: woensdag 13 februari 2013 16:12
Aan: notmuch at notmuchmail.org
CC: Robert Mast
Onderwerp: [english 100%] [PATCH] bitmap:improve
diff --git a/lib/query.cc b/lib/query.cc
index e9c1a2d..7381a54 100644
--- a/lib/query.cc
+++ b/lib/query.cc
@@ -39,12 +39,12 @@ typedef struct _notmuch_mset_messages {
} notmuch_mset_messages_t;
struct _notmuch_doc_id_set {
-unsigned int *bitmap;
+unsigned char *bitmap;
unsigned in
Profpatsch wrote:
> Since I don’t get your bug tracking system (d’oh ;), here is a bug I
> encountered with notmuch-mutt using this macro I guess was from the
> “official” tutorial:
>
> # Construct a thread ouf of the marked mail (or something like that,
> # doesn’t work atm (errors out))
> ma
c
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20130213/49002523/attachment.pgp>
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:09:22 +0100, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the
headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)
satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like
headers:"List-Id: blah" or si
On Tue, Feb 12 2013, Mark Walters wrote:
> I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the
> headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)
> satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like
> headers:"List-Id: blah" or similar.
>
> It is not
.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20130213/e291e6a3/attachment.pgp>
On 13-02-13 05:26pm, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> OK, I understand the problem now. Although I don't understand how it's
> possible. Can you please do the following test:
>
> - go on a mail, try on it to ensure it exhibit the bad behavior
> you've reported
It does.
> - find out the Message-Id
[ please keep the notmuch@ list in Cc:, so that others could help and/or
benefit from the solution ... when we find one :-) ]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:51:05PM +0100, Profpatsch wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but I still don't get it. What do you mean with "no mail"?
>
> Haha, sorry, that was misleadin
vailable
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20130213/449919f3/attachment.pgp>
Robert Mast writes:
> Re-submission for comment-reasons.
Very nicely done, Robert. Thanks.
-Carl (who's not quite merging patches again yet, but likely will be soon)
--
carl.d.wo...@intel.com
pgphLI1N74MEo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch
I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the
headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)
satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like
headers:"List-Id: blah" or similar.
It is not as nice as individually indexed headers, but it does
> Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
>
>> But don't get me wrong, the CLI is one of the things that makes notmuch
>> so incredibly awesome. It's an email swiss army knife that's there when
>> you need it. But given that even I often need to look at the man page
>> during my occasional CLI usage, I j
Using char instead of int allows for simpler definitions of the
DOCIDSET macros so the code is easier to understand and consistent with
respect to memory-usage. Estimated reduction of memory-usage for
bitmap about 8 times.
---
Re-submission for comment-reasons.
---
---
lib/query.cc | 10 +
Somehow my comments don't get through... I'll try it another way.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Robert Mast [mailto:beheer...@tekenbeetziekten.nl]
Verzonden: woensdag 13 februari 2013 16:12
Aan: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
CC: Robert Mast
Onderwerp: [english 100%] [PATCH] bitmap:improve memor
diff --git a/lib/query.cc b/lib/query.cc
index e9c1a2d..7381a54 100644
--- a/lib/query.cc
+++ b/lib/query.cc
@@ -39,12 +39,12 @@ typedef struct _notmuch_mset_messages {
} notmuch_mset_messages_t;
struct _notmuch_doc_id_set {
-unsigned int *bitmap;
+unsigned char *bitmap;
unsigned i
On Sat, Feb 09 2013, da...@tethera.net wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> In the case of large changes to the database from git, one of main
> current bottlenecks is the large number of execs of notmuch tag. This
> avoids that by using use the batch tagging facilities as of notmuch
> 0.15.
>
> We u
25 matches
Mail list logo
