Jani Nikula writes:
> The test description is used for log output, I think the intention is
> to keep it as a one-liner. Leave the rest of the long description as a
> comment.
pushed this one patch to master
___
notmuch mailing list
David Bremner writes:
> The main goal is to prepare the way for non-destructive (or at least
> less destructive) exclude tag handling. It does this by having a
> pre-parsed query available for further processing. This also allows us
> to provide slightly more precise errorr
Jani Nikula writes:
> Fix warning caught by clang:
>
> lib/regexp-fields.cc:41:2: warning: 'delete' applied to a pointer that was
> allocated
> with 'new[]'; did you mean 'delete[]'? [-Wmismatched-new-delete]
> delete buffer;
> ^
> []
>
Mark Walters writes:
> Headers of more than 998 characters should be folded when sending.
> However, until recently, emacs did not do this.
series pushed to master
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Headers of more than 998 characters should be folded when sending.
However, until recently, emacs did not do this.
This adds a (known broken) test for this when sending messages in
emacs. We will backport the fix to notmuch-emacs in the next
changeset.
---
test/T310-emacs.sh | 78
Version 2 of this series is at
id:1488649637-19006-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com
The change here is to split the folding headers function into an
explicit function as this makes managing the hook simpler.
Best wishes
Mark
Mark Walters (2):
Test: emacs: test for folding long
This backports the fix from emacs master (commit
77bbca8c82f6e553c42abbfafca28f55fc995d00) to notmuch-emacs to wrap
long headers.
This fixes the test introduced in the previous changeset.
---
emacs/notmuch-compat.el | 28
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4
Mark Walters writes:
> This backports the fix from emacs master (commit
> 77bbca8c82f6e553c42abbfafca28f55fc995d00) to notmuch-emacs to wrap
> long headers.
>
> This fixes the test introduced in the previous changeset.
> ---
> emacs/notmuch-compat.el | 28
Mark Walters writes:
> Headers of more than 998 characters should be folded when sending.
> However, until recently, emacs did not do this.
>
> This adds a (known broken) test for this when sending messages in
> emacs. We will backport the fix to notmuch-emacs in the
The only change from v1 (at
id:1485684281-2760-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com ) is an
updated test as suggested by Domo using echo {1..1000} instead of seq.
Best wishes
Mark
Mark Walters (2):
Test: emacs: test for folding long headers.
emacs: compat: backport fix for folding
This backports the fix from emacs master (commit
77bbca8c82f6e553c42abbfafca28f55fc995d00) to notmuch-emacs to wrap
long headers.
This fixes the test introduced in the previous changeset.
---
emacs/notmuch-compat.el | 28
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4
Headers of more than 998 characters should be folded when sending.
However, until recently, emacs did not do this.
This adds a (known broken) test for this when sending messages in
emacs. We will backport the fix to notmuch-emacs in the next
changeset.
---
test/T310-emacs.sh | 78
Fix warning caught by clang:
lib/regexp-fields.cc:41:2: warning: 'delete' applied to a pointer that was
allocated
with 'new[]'; did you mean 'delete[]'? [-Wmismatched-new-delete]
delete buffer;
^
[]
lib/regexp-fields.cc:37:17: note: allocated with 'new[]' here
> On irc rlb pointed me to
> https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/removing_everything_from_github/
>
> IANAL so I don't know whether it is a real problem, a hypothetical
> problem or not a problem.
I got a couple of links sent to me privately which look relevant:
*
Dear All
On irc rlb pointed me to
https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/removing_everything_from_github/
IANAL so I don't know whether it is a real problem, a hypothetical
problem or not a problem.
My guess is that it can't affect the main notmuch license as the bulk of
notmuch's copyright is owned by
David Bremner writes:
> Matthew Lear writes:
>
>
>> Thanks David. Yes it does. After recompiling the v25 lisp with these
>> changes, I'm unable to reproduce the problems with both the test emails I
>> sent you. Wonderful :-)
>> Are you going to raise
16 matches
Mail list logo