Re: [PATCH] Add --message-headers flag to notmuch-show

2019-11-12 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Tue, Nov 12 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > And, I still haven't heard any clear arguments for choosing between > configurability as an absolute thing or a differential thing. They have > significantly different impact on adopters over time, as the default > configuration changes. I don'

Re: [PATCH] Add --message-headers flag to notmuch-show

2019-11-12 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2019-11-12 20:24:12 +0100, Johan Parin wrote: > I think this is quite basic functionality. All "nerdy" muas have it ;) > Gnus has it, mu4e has it etc. mutt seems to have some reasonable default > of at least displaying User-Agent. I think Thunderbird has it too. etc Yes, and of course i acc

unifying and automating draft ("postpone/resume") behavior [was: Re: notmuch "lost" email during power failure]

2019-11-12 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Antoine-- [epic story and funny rnat trimmed down to the salient bug reports and feature requests because i'm a boring person] On Tue 2019-11-12 17:19:05 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > I would argue that notmuch should at least allow me to recover from a > power failure like this, as a MUA.

notmuch "lost" email during power failure

2019-11-12 Thread Antoine Beaupré
r hour rewriting the damn message after the power failure, but it was accurate: one of those files had a filename that pointed at: ~/Mail/drafts/#*message*-20191112-165309# which contained the auto-save of the message! Hurray! As it turns out, that location (~/Mail/drafts) is the default `message-

Re: Segfault when tagging results of to: query

2019-11-12 Thread Reto
That's most probably xapians fault. Xapian 1.4.13 has a bug in it, there's a patch available but no new version has been released yet. You can find the issue here: https://trac.xapian.org/ticket/796#no1 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org ht

Re: [PATCH] Add --message-headers flag to notmuch-show

2019-11-12 Thread Johan Parin
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > On Mon 2019-11-11 10:26:18 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> - What is the specific use case for this? For example, can you identify >>situations where different headers need to be emitted by different >>users? Even one motivating example would help ot

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread Johan Parin
Teemu Likonen writes: > > It seems to me that using search term tag:unread will help you. Try this > in the *hello* buffer: > > z tag:unread > > You'll go directly to tree view and unread messages will show with > normal colours and read messages with grey colour. Commands "n" and > "p" will

Re: [PATCH] Add --message-headers flag to notmuch-show

2019-11-12 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2019-11-12 12:19:01, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Tue 2019-11-12 10:48:54 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> They need User-Agent:, I want Archive-At:, they will want >> X-Mailer... when is it going to stop? > > It's going to stop when users are satisfied. :) I highly doubt that we > will reac

Re: [PATCH] Add --message-headers flag to notmuch-show

2019-11-12 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2019-11-12 10:48:54 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > They need User-Agent:, I want Archive-At:, they will want > X-Mailer... when is it going to stop? It's going to stop when users are satisfied. :) I highly doubt that we will reach all possible headers. > I would rather have configurabili

Re: [PATCH] Add --message-headers flag to notmuch-show

2019-11-12 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2019-11-11 10:39:11, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Mon 2019-11-11 10:26:18 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> - What is the specific use case for this? For example, can you identify >>situations where different headers need to be emitted by different >>users? Even one motivating ex

Re: Debian packaging cleanup

2019-11-12 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2019-11-10 12:37:42, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > This series offers a set of simple and small changes to the debian > packaging for notmuch. they apply to the master branch. > > I've reviewed these changes, and tested a build with them with no > problems. > > A modern, canonicalized debian pac

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread William Casarin
Teemu Likonen writes: > Teemu Likonen [2019-11-12T16:54:35+02] wrote: > >> But indeed, a command like "notmuch-search-show-thread-tree" (M-RET, >> C-u RET, C-RET...) would be useful: open current thread directly in >> tree view and with current search terms. > > But that is already there (without

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread Teemu Likonen
Teemu Likonen [2019-11-12T16:54:35+02] wrote: > But indeed, a command like "notmuch-search-show-thread-tree" (M-RET, > C-u RET, C-RET...) would be useful: open current thread directly in > tree view and with current search terms. But that is already there (without keybinding): (defun notmuch

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread Teemu Likonen
William Casarin [2019-11-12T05:59:09-08] wrote: > Teemu Likonen writes: >> Seems like the same as pressing Enter to select a thread and then Z >> to see the thread it in tree view. No? > > Yes, but this has performance implications on large threads. Pressing > Enter will load all of the messages.

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread William Casarin
David Edmondson writes: > On Tuesday, 2019-11-12 at 05:17:46 -08, William Casarin wrote: > >> David Edmondson writes: >>> On Monday, 2019-11-11 at 00:16:17 +01, Johan Parin wrote: I'm trying instead to use the tree view, this seems to me the more natural way to view threads. So I

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread William Casarin
Teemu Likonen writes: > William Casarin [2019-11-12T05:17:46-08] wrote: > >> I find myself doing `c i z Ctrl-v` to open the tree view for a >> specific thread, but perhaps it would make sense if there was a >> default keybind for this. > > Seems like the same as pressing Enter to select a thread

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread Teemu Likonen
William Casarin [2019-11-12T05:17:46-08] wrote: > I find myself doing `c i z Ctrl-v` to open the tree view for a > specific thread, but perhaps it would make sense if there was a > default keybind for this. Seems like the same as pressing Enter to select a thread and then Z to see the thread it i

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread David Edmondson
On Tuesday, 2019-11-12 at 05:17:46 -08, William Casarin wrote: David Edmondson writes: On Monday, 2019-11-11 at 00:16:17 +01, Johan Parin wrote: I'm trying instead to use the tree view, this seems to me the more natural way to view threads. So I immediately do `Z' whenever I enter a thread.

Re: Unread handling

2019-11-12 Thread William Casarin
David Edmondson writes: > On Monday, 2019-11-11 at 00:16:17 +01, Johan Parin wrote: >> I'm trying instead to use the tree view, this seems to me the >> more natural way to view threads. So I immediately do `Z' >> whenever I enter a thread. I would like to have the option to >> enter tree view