Re: [PATCH 00/13] vim: a bunch of updates from upstream

2021-04-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 5:14 PM David Bremner wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > > > Then I think we could consider removing the vim stuff from notmuch. In > > the meantime I think the three code-bases serve a purpose. > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. Your reasoning makes sense to > me.

Re: [PATCH 00/13] vim: a bunch of updates from upstream

2021-04-19 Thread David Bremner
Felipe Contreras writes: > > Then I think we could consider removing the vim stuff from notmuch. In > the meantime I think the three code-bases serve a purpose. > Thanks for the detailed explanation. Your reasoning makes sense to me. Now if only we could get more than one person at a time intere

Re: [PATCH 00/13] vim: a bunch of updates from upstream

2021-04-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 5:16 AM David Bremner wrote: > > Felipe Contreras writes: > > > I finally took some time to update notmuch-vim and include some fixes, > > as well as pull requests. > > > > Here are the transplanted patches. > > > > So, big picture question. If notmuch is not upstream for

Re: [PATCH] ruby: fix ruby 3.1 warnings

2021-04-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:50 PM Tomi Ollila wrote: > (otoh?) latest git-send-email has this option: --8bit-encoding > -- and if not given (and not in git config), according to namual page, > will prompt for an encoding (IIRC I've seen this w/ git 2.30) I have this configured: sendemail.assume

Re: [PATCH] ruby: fix ruby 3.1 warnings

2021-04-19 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Mon, Apr 19 2021, David Bremner wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > >> Hello. >> >> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 7:20 AM David Bremner wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the patch. I have a couple of questions / comments >>> >>> - It doesn't apply against current master (5248f55d5f1). Can you rebase >>> i

Re: [PATCH 00/13] vim: a bunch of updates from upstream

2021-04-19 Thread David Bremner
Felipe Contreras writes: > I finally took some time to update notmuch-vim and include some fixes, > as well as pull requests. > > Here are the transplanted patches. > So, big picture question. If notmuch is not upstream for this code, should we be distributing it? d

Re: [PATCH] ruby: fix ruby 3.1 warnings

2021-04-19 Thread David Bremner
Felipe Contreras writes: > Hello. > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 7:20 AM David Bremner wrote: > >> Thanks for the patch. I have a couple of questions / comments >> >> - It doesn't apply against current master (5248f55d5f1). Can you rebase >> it? > > Huh? That's precisely the commit I used as a ba

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] scaffolding for autocrypt support

2021-04-19 Thread David Edmondson
On Friday, 2021-04-16 at 09:05:29 -03, David Bremner wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > >> Hi David, all-- >> >> On Sun 2021-02-21 15:21:30 +, David Edmondson wrote: >>> I started looking at how to add autocrypt support based on >>> https://git.sr.ht/~zge/autocrypt. >> >> Thanks for this