> I guess "-v 2" makes sense here. It's just a hint that the new patch
> obsoletes a previous one.
Thanks! I appreciate the help!
Austin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send
Both notmuch_database_open() and notmuch_database_open_verbose()'s
documentation state they call notmuch_database_open_with_config() with
config_path=NULL; however, their implementations pass an empty string.
The empty string is the correct value to maintain their original
behavior of not loading
> So maybe it's a doc bug?
That sounds good to me.
Since notmuch_database_open() has a similar doc bug, would you like the
corrections in one or two patches during the resubmit?
Also, since I'm new to this git workflow, should I use the "-vN" option
for the resubmit or leave it off as this
YUE Daian writes:
> Hi Notmuch mail list,
>
> I noticed that the Emacs notmuch tree stopped working after a recent (?)
> upgrade.
>
I think the most we could do is have notmuch-emacs print a more
informative message telling the user to upgrade notmuch (patches for
that would be welcome; I
Hi Notmuch mail list,
I noticed that the Emacs notmuch tree stopped working after a recent (?)
upgrade.
I checked the code and found that it adds "--sort=newest-first" as
sort-arg to "notmuch show" command.
Machine environment:
Emacs: 27.2
Emasc Notmuch version: notmuch-20210805.1158 installed
