David Bremner writes:
> In [1] Rob observed that notmuch new ignored directories called
> .notmuch everywhere in the tree, where they should only (and now, with
> split configs, at most) be ignored at the top level. Add a test to
> demonstrate the problem.
>
> [1]: id:87mwhifu9a@trouble.defau
In split configurations there is no special significance to a top
level directory called .notmuch in the mail root. Users should
therefore be able to have mail stored underneath it.
---
My only worry was residual .notmuch directories after people switch
from legacy layout to split, but I tested by
Originally contributed by Brian Sniffen. Quite a few unpublished fixes
from Daniel Kahn Gilmour. We've been running it a few years now as the
"official" archive of the notmuch mailing list. There also a few fixes
from myself and Austin Ray. Finally I converted it to the new python
bindings.
This c
David Bremner writes:
> Reduce the amount of noise in the build log.
> ---
applied to master.
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
On Fri, Jan 14 2022, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
> on second thought, i think we could perhaps just go for the simpler
> "%t", which would allow inserting the type anywhere, even in the middle
> of a word... i think a problem here is that "word" or "symbol" (which is
> what my suggestion used) cons
On Sun, Jan 16 2022, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14 2022, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
>> on second thought, i think we could perhaps just go for the simpler
>> "%t", which would allow inserting the type anywhere, even in the middle
>> of a word... i think a problem here is that "word" or "sym
Jose A Ortega Ruiz writes:
> yeah, that's what i use and didn't notice my error above. format-spec
> is much nicer than a plain regexp subs, one can use format specifiers
> like %3t and many others, but unfortunately seems to have been
> introduced in emacs 27.
format-spec has been present in Em
On Sun, Jan 16 2022, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Jose A Ortega Ruiz writes:
>
>> yeah, that's what i use and didn't notice my error above. format-spec
>> is much nicer than a plain regexp subs, one can use format specifiers
>> like %3t and many others, but unfortunately seems to have been
>> introduced i
Jose A Ortega Ruiz writes:
> In very recent emacs (i'm using its master branch, actually), if one M-x
> describe-function RET format-spec one sees in the help buffer:
>
> Probably introduced at or before Emacs version 27.1.
>
> that's where my misconception came from.
I see. If I recall c
Customizable names for buffers presenting search results, via two
custom variables (notmuch-search-buffer-name-format and
notmuch-saved-search-buffer-name-format), defaulting to values
currently used for plain searches and including too tree and
unthreaded search buffers.
---
This is a much impro
On Sun, Jan 16 2022, Kyle Meyer wrote:
[...]
> Here's the last statement about the minimum Emacs version I see in
> Notmuch's NEWS (for v0.31):
>
> The minimum supported major version of GNU Emacs is now 25.1.
>
> The example in my last message used 25.3 because that's the closest
> version to
11 matches
Mail list logo
