On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:06:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:31:36 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:38 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > Message mode uses a different name for composition
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:38 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Message mode uses a different name for composition buffers in newer
> versions of emacs. Allow for this when causing the composition window
> to overlay the viewing window.
> ---
>
> I don't understand why Aneesh chose to use `add-hook'
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:06:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:31:36 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V"
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:38 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > Message mode uses a different name for composition buffers in newer
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:38 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Message mode uses a different name for composition buffers in newer
> versions of emacs. Allow for this when causing the composition window
> to overlay the viewing window.
> ---
>
> I don't understand why Aneesh chose to use `add-hook'
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:28:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:56:57 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> >
> > When you have long thread, it would be nice to be able to
> > show the message to which the current message is a repl
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:28:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:56:57 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
> wrote:
> > From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> >
> > When you have long thread, it would be nice to be able to
> > show the message to which the current message is a reply
>
> The patch
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:37:11 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> I pushed hard to get most everything we wanted for 0.3 done yesterday,
> (which was one week since 0.2). I think we're still within the tolerance
> of my published "about a week" schedule, but I would like to wrap things
> up soon.
>
> Here
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:37:11 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> I pushed hard to get most everything we wanted for 0.3 done yesterday,
> (which was one week since 0.2). I think we're still within the tolerance
> of my published "about a week" schedule, but I would like to wrap things
> up soon.
>
> Here
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little f
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo
> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redis
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
I found another issue. In the notmuch-show-mode "RET" key on from and
subject doesn't seem to work.
For ex: for the last message "RET" key on from doesn't fold the message.
For all the message "RET" key on subject doesn't show the messag
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:14:09 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the inline patches shown similar to
> > diff-mode not just the attached patches ?
>
>
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
I found another issue. In the notmuch-show-mode "RET" key on from and
subject doesn't seem to work.
For ex: for the last message "RET" key on from doesn't fold the message.
For all the message "RET" key on subject doesn't show the messag
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:14:09 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V"
> wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the inline patches shown similar to
> > diff-mode not just the attached patches ?
>
> A new hook fu
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:32:41 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I've pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository
> > at http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
> >
> > This is intended to be fu
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:32:41 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I've pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository
> > at http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
> >
> > This is intended to be fu
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT), Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:08:47 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> > For the issue of a background task interfering with interactive use, the
> > feel
> > arguably matters more than the throughput.
> >
> > I'll probably put that patch in 1.0.19
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT), Ben Gamari
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:08:47 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> > For the issue of a background task interfering with interactive use, the
> > feel
> > arguably matters more than the throughput.
> >
> > I'll probably put that patch in 1.0.1
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:11:46 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
>
> This patch helps in customizing search result display
> similar to mutt's index_format. The customization is done
> by defining an alist as below
>
> (setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ")
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:11:46 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
wrote:
> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
>
> This patch helps in customizing search result display
> similar to mutt's index_format. The customization is done
> by defining an alist as below
>
> (setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ")
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:07:26 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Arbitrary font faces can be specified for given thread tags. By
> default, no coloring is applied. To specify coloring, place something
> like this in your .emacs:
>
> (setq notmuch-search-line-faces '(("delete" . '(:foreground "red")
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:07:26 -0500, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> Arbitrary font faces can be specified for given thread tags. By
> default, no coloring is applied. To specify coloring, place something
> like this in your .emacs:
>
> (setq notmuch-search-line-faces '(("delete" . '(:foreground "red"
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:19:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
>
> This patch helps in customizing search result display
> similar to mutt's index_format. The customization is done
> by defining an alist as below
>
> (setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ")
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:07:54 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:16:44 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> >
> > This patch add --format=sender-only option.
>
> I like the idea here, (and agree that an 'R' keybinding would be great).
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:19:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
wrote:
> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
>
> This patch helps in customizing search result display
> similar to mutt's index_format. The customization is done
> by defining an alist as below
>
> (setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ")
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:07:54 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:16:44 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
> wrote:
> > From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> >
> > This patch add --format=sender-only option.
>
> I like the idea here, (and agree that an 'R' keybinding would be great).
>
> But surely t
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:58:38 +0200, Baruch Even wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added a quick hack to show a message thread in notmuch-gtk and this
> makes it semi-usable. I don't actually parse the reply of notmuch-show
> but it's already passably usable to read mail.
>
While discussing notmuch with some
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:58:38 +0200, Baruch Even wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added a quick hack to show a message thread in notmuch-gtk and this
> makes it semi-usable. I don't actually parse the reply of notmuch-show
> but it's already passably usable to read mail.
>
While discussing notmuch with some
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I just pushed out a nice set of changes to the emacs interface. Here's a
> quick summary of what you can expect to get when you next update:
>
> * Much nicer looking presentation, (no more ugly reverse-video or
> underlines on the mess
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
.
>
> * The magic space bar is too magic. Threads are separate conversations
> so one key for paging through the current conversation shouldn't
> also switch to the next conversation, (particularly when the
> complementary
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I just pushed out a nice set of changes to the emacs interface. Here's a
> quick summary of what you can expect to get when you next update:
>
> * Much nicer looking presentation, (no more ugly reverse-video or
> underlines on the mess
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
.
>
> * The magic space bar is too magic. Threads are separate conversations
> so one key for paging through the current conversation shouldn't
> also switch to the next conversation, (particularly when the
> complementary
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:50:39 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Remove the underline of both message summary and subject lines.
> Message summary still defaults to reverse-video, use customize to
> change it to whatever you like.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan-Ru Chen
> ---
> notmuch.el | 20 +++
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:50:39 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Remove the underline of both message summary and subject lines.
> Message summary still defaults to reverse-video, use customize to
> change it to whatever you like.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan-Ru Chen
> ---
> notmuch.el | 20 +++
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:01:32 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I know it's a hairy problem, but has anyone started
> > looking into OpenPGP support for notmuch?
>
> Hey, folks. I wanted to try to follow up
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:01:32 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I know it's a hairy problem, but has anyone started
> > looking into OpenPGP support for notmuch?
>
> Hey, folks. I wanted to try to follow u
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:24:07 -0800, Alexander Botero-Lowry wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:28:00 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > This add two faces, notmuch-show-subject-face and
> > notmuch-tag-face. The first face is used to show the subject
> > line in the notmuch-show
37 matches
Mail list logo
