On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 06:01 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 16:51:17 16.12.2009 UTC-07 when bdale at gag.com did gyre and
> gimble:
>
> >> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to
> >> be useless.
>
> BG> FWIW, that does not match my experience.
>
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 06:01 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 16:51:17 16.12.2009 UTC-07 when bd...@gag.com did gyre and
> gimble:
>
> >> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to
> >> be useless.
>
> BG> FWIW, that does not match my experience.
>
> Y
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:35 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to be
> useless.
FWIW, that does not match my experience.
> Any reason not to just use something like
> to:notmuch at notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this o
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:35 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to be
> useless.
FWIW, that does not match my experience.
> Any reason not to just use something like
> to:notm...@notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this one?
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 22:11 -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> While playing with notmuch I am still using evolution to read the email
> in the same MailDir that is being indexed / processed by notmuch. With
> the result that lots of emails can not be found in notmuch if they have
> been marked as read i
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 22:11 -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> While playing with notmuch I am still using evolution to read the email
> in the same MailDir that is being indexed / processed by notmuch. With
> the result that lots of emails can not be found in notmuch if they have
> been marked as read i
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 08:55 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> As much as I would love to, at this point I'm not quite offering to
> actually be maintainer of a notmuch Debian package.
Actually, since Carl is a DD now, I've already nudged him about
maintaining a Debian package, and offered to
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 08:55 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> As much as I would love to, at this point I'm not quite offering to
> actually be maintainer of a notmuch Debian package.
Actually, since Carl is a DD now, I've already nudged him about
maintaining a Debian package, and offered to
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 23:10 +0100, Jan Janak wrote:
> Instead of 'inbox' and 'unread', I configure
> 'notmuch new' to add a new tag called 'new' (and only that one). This tag
> marks newly added messages that haven't been properly tagged yet by my
> auto-tagging scripts.
Oh, brilliant! I like i
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Sadly that takes around 25 minutes here on an Intel Core2Duo notbeook
> (Thinkpad
> X200s). I tried this several times now. CPU load was low (~10%) during this
> time
> so it is mostly IO bound.
I see the same behavior on my notebook.
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 15:41 +0100, Carl Worth wrote:
> The other reason I've wanted this is have something like a "folder view"
> that would show a list of tags and a number of messages with each tag,
> (or a number of messages with that tag and the inbox tag).
>
> I know that Keith said he'd pre
11 matches
Mail list logo
