On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:07:27PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Don Zickus writes:
>
> >
> > Of course I am using this in a strange context. I am deleting emails
> > locally and then running 'notmuch new' to clean up the database.
> >
> [snip]
&g
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:36:23AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Don Zickus writes:
>
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is my fstrim service runs 1x / week on Monday
> > at midnight and maybe that helped clean things up?? Perhaps I should
> > increase that fre
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:31:09AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Don Zickus writes:
>
> >
> > Hmm, for me --small was 35s and --medium was 32 minutes. This is on a
> > i7-9750H / nvme. I would expect numbers similar to yours.
> >
>
> In addition to th
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 05:29:13PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Don Zickus writes:
>
> >> runs in about 30s here (i7 4770 / SSD). Replacing --small with --medium
> >> takes about 10M (so a superlinear slowdown in wall clock time, since
> >> that represents
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:01:52PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Don Zickus writes:
>
> >
> > Tips for debugging this?
> >
> > I ran the notmuch performance/time-test, but after 15 minutes of waiting for
> > the initial notmuch new to finish, I gave
Hi,
I have noticed my 'notmuch new' command seems awfully slow, maybe 10-20
emails / second on large batches. It goes quick for the first few hundred
(maybe close to 100/second), then quickly slows down to about 10/second
after processing the first 500 or so.
I am guessing that isn't an