[notmuch] 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
some debugging myself if I get some hints where to look. regards Stefan Schmidt

[notmuch] 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 08:12, Bdale Garbee wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > Sadly that takes around 25 minutes here on an Intel Core2Duo notbeook > > (Thinkpad > > X200s). I tried this several times now. CPU load was low (~10

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
here too and it would be easier to find and test. And as notmuch is still under heavy development its not a problem that the vim interface is as well. regards Stefan Schmidt

[notmuch] 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
s nice of Keith to share this with everyone. And it's nice of all > you to come take a look at things. Getting it out now was a good move. It had enough code to actually do omething usefull and many people waited for something like this. The increasing number of contributors in such a short time shows it very well. :) regards Stefan Schmidt

[notmuch] 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:26, Carl Worth wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:36:55 +0100, Stefan Schmidt datenfreihafen.org> wrote: > > > In my case only 80 messages were printed before the gap. All of them had a > > wrong > > year in the timestamp. 1900 and 197

[notmuch] 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:07, Carl Worth wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:51:11 +0100, Stefan Schmidt datenfreihafen.org> wrote: > > Disclaimer: I'm using vim, in combination with mutt for email, for years, > > but > > never dealt with emacs. Please have th

[notmuch] notmuch vim support

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. [Resend, first one missed the list] On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 14:14, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > * Stefan Schmidt [091121 14:06]: > > IMHO it would be best to do the development inside the main tree. You could > > use > > branches there too and it would be easier to

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-config: Fix memleaks.

2009-11-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
>From 4bb598e6e0fa32d5184be54cb5c66fe364eba374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Holger Freyther Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:45:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] notmuch-config: Fix memleaks. While talloc is great we need to free the g_error by hand. Tested-by: Stefan Schmidt Signed-off-by: Holger Freyt

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] notmuch-new: Tag mails not as unread when the seen flag in the maildir is set.

2009-11-22 Thread Stefan Schmidt
With the new notmuch_message_get_flags() function we can get the information if a message was already flagged as seen in maildir by another mailer or tool. This gives a more realistic picture instead of flagging all as unread. Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt --- Makefile |2 +- notmuch

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] lib/message: Add function to get maildir flags.

2009-11-22 Thread Stefan Schmidt
With notmuch_message_get_flags() we gain the information if the message was flagged as read, draft, trashed, etc. Handy for big mail spooles that were used with another mailer. Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt --- lib/message.cc | 26 ++ lib/notmuch.h | 10

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] lib/message: Add function to get maildir flags.

2009-11-22 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 16:28, Keith Packard wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:11:00 +0100, Stefan Schmidt datenfreihafen.org> wrote: > > > +const char * > > +notmuch_message_get_flags (notmuch_message_t *message) > > This function should interpret the flags

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] lib/message: Add function to get maildir flags.

2009-11-22 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:55, Michiel Buddingh' wrote: > Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > This function should interpret the flags that it finds and return a > > > suitable set of notmuch tags. I'd suggest that 'unread' messages get > > >

[notmuch] [PATCH] Makefile: Enable backslash escapes for echo.

2009-11-26 Thread Stefan Schmidt
This fixes a visual glitch during a silent compile. Before: Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.\n CC debugger.o CCgmime-filter-reply.o After: Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines. CCdebugger.o CCgmime-filter-reply.o Signed-of

[notmuch] [PATCH] Makefile: Enable backslash escapes for echo.

2009-11-26 Thread Stefan Schmidt
This fixes a visual glitch during a silent compile. Before: Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.\n CC debugger.o CCgmime-filter-reply.o After: Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines. CCdebugger.o CCgmime-filter-reply.o Signed-of