+1
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
A new configuration key 'database.exclude' is used to determine
which directories user wants not to be scanned for new mails.
---
Notes (from 2011-09-13):
1) Currently the comments for newly created configuration file are not
updated, so for not this is 'undocumented feature'. Should there be an
Moved _notmuch_get_list () and _notmuch_set_list () to a location
in notmuch-config.c so that new functions that will be located
before the old location of those functions can also use these.
---
This patch is independent of the next one (just required by it)
and can (should) be pushed early.
n
I personally like -ise (easier to my mind, 'z' is so "hard" in finnish
language), but -ize is just prevalent in emacs (customiSe, propertiSe)
Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
+1
Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:17:50 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Turn on `visual-line-mode' via a hook, so that those who so choose can
> avoid it.
> ---
+1
I think the docstring is good (or it could be
nonexistent like in 'turn-on-font-lock).
Tomi
___
n
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:11:36 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:11:58 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > A new configuration key 'database.exclude' is used to determine
> > which directories user wants not to be scanned for new mails.
> >
> >
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:03:46 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:11:57 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > Moved _notmuch_get_list () and _notmuch_set_list () to a location
> > in notmuch-config.c so that new functions that will be located
> > before the old locati
Moved static functions _notmuch_get_list () and _notmuch_set_list ()
closer to the beginning of file so that their definition is known
(without adding forward declarations) in further work.
No functional changes.
---
notmuch-config.c | 84 +++---
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:08:50 +0100, Justus Winter
<4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> This patch series adds a section for the python binding changes to the
> NEWS file.
LGTM -- although knowing which python 2.x versions works would
be nice to know. At least tests pass using python 2.5 b
LGTM. all 3.
Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:29:01 -0500, Allan Wind
wrote:
> The function notmuch_database_find_message_by_filename now requires a
> notmuch_message_t and returns a notmuch_status_t. This
> change was introduced with 02a3076711, LIBNOTMUCH_VERSION_MAJOR = 2,
> version 0.9.
> ---
Good, but
[ ... ]
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:03:59 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:41:36 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > > Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
> > >
> >
> > This looks OK, although the re-indenting
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:07:08 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
> files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
> and a user is tricked into replying to the message, the user’s files
> could be exposed.
> ---
Moved static functions _config_get_list () and _config_set_list ()
closer to the beginning of file so that their definition is known
(without adding forward declarations) in upcoming changes.
---
This addresses Ethan's comments. Thanks.
s/_notmuch_/_config_/ and changed 'in further work' to 'in u
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:02:33 -0500, Allan Wind
wrote:
> The function notmuch_database_find_message_by_filename now requires a
> notmuch_message_t and returns a notmuch_status_t. This
> change was introduced with 02a3076711, LIBNOTMUCH_VERSION_MAJOR = 2,
> version 0.9.
> ---
> + * status = no
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:24:46 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> `Notmuch-wash-region-to-button' is the function that creates hidden
> regions with buttons for signatures, citations and original messages.
> Before the change, it did not work correctly if the to-be-hidden
> region started at the begi
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:46:58 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> From: David Bremner
[ ... ]
> +
> +* Indent is 4 spaces with mixed tabs/spaces and a tab width of 8.
> + Tabs should be only at the beginning of the line.
So, after initial indentation (with tabs) there should not be further
tabs? We'
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:55:26 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> This makes the text formatter take advantage of the new code
> structure. The previously duplicated header logic is now unified,
> several things that we used to compute repeatedly across different
> callbacks are now computed once, and
Works fine. +1
Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:30:59 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> v3:
> - Add a toggle for line truncation (>).
> - Retain the state of a show buffer across a call to refresh (which
>includes the various toggles here).
Applied and tested -- patches 2-5 works fine -- I currently don't have
any me
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:35:44 -0500, Allan Wind
wrote:
> The function notmuch_database_find_message_by_filename now requires a
> notmuch_message_t and returns a notmuch_status_t. This
> change was introduced with 02a3076711, LIBNOTMUCH_VERSION_MAJOR = 2,
> version 0.9.
LGTM.
Tomi
__
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:01:54 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> When using the spacebar to scroll through a thread, hitting 'space'
> when the bottom of the last message is visible should take the cursor
> to the end of the buffer rather than immediately archiving the thread
> and moving to the next
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:01:53 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> When archiving the last message in a thread (a), rather than just
> moving the pointer to the next thread in the parent search buffer,
> actually display the next thread.
> ---
-1. Magic! Rather some customization option which lets user
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:51:44 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:43:10 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:01:53 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > When archiving the last message in a thread (a), rather than just
> > > mov
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:30:20 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:25:36 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > I like David's alternative suggestion (in IRC) where cursor is left at
> > the end of buffer in case last message is archived with 'a'.
>
>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:32:12 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:25:19 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:52:20 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered
> > > to be part of the body
A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
This work merges my previous attempts and Andreas Amann's work
in id:"ylp7hi23mw8@tyndall.ie"
See notes in id:"20120131-new-ignore-1-git-send-email-...@iki.fi"
---
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:50:06 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:23:32 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:15:11 +, Mark Walters
> > wrote:
> > > Hi I have reviewed the patch series within the limits of my lisp
> > > knowledge. Patch 1: is rather beyon
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:47:30 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:19:54 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > The down side of this approach is that diff argument order depends on
> > test_expect_equal_file() argument order. So sometimes we get diff
> > from expected to
There are at least these options here
1) go through all ~100 places where test_expect_equal_file is used
and fix the call order: quick look tells that the offending uses
are in dump-restore, hooks, search-limiting and symbol-hiding.
2) enforce "expected" filename has some format *and* fix
ions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 devel/newssplit.pl
diff --git a/devel/newssplit.pl b/devel/newssplit.pl
new file mode 100755
index 000..c1a0b26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/devel/newssplit.pl
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+#!/usr/bin/perl
+# Author: Tomi Ollila
+# License: same as notmuch
+
+# This prog
A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken
(test from id:"1328105573-4626-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org" ).
This work merges my previous attempts and Andreas A
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:33:56 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:24:32 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
> > If this is really a problem, I vote for 1. In general, I am not in
> > favor of making the test suite more complicated than it needs to be.
>
> After listening to
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:58:41 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add default value to notmuch-search-line-faces to show "unread"
> messages in bold, and "flagged" messages in blue, to have some visual
> indication of important messages in search results. This should be
> helpful for new users.
>
> "unrea
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:32:12 +0100, Fabio Zanini
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is my first message to the list. In 2010 a patch was developed that
> enabled notmuch new to ignore certain subdirectories of the mail folder:
>
> http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/003170.html
>
> However, I can
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:24:46 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:19:30 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:52:15 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > `notmuch-show-get-prop' should be declared.
> > > ---
> >
> &g
A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken
(test from id:"1328105573-4626-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org" ).
This work merges my previous attempts and Andreas A
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:35:10 +0100, Simon Campese
wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> I've got my own domain and when registering or shopping at some website,
> I always use email addresses of the form "websiten...@mydomain.org", so
> for example I use "ama...@mydomain.org" when shopping at amazon. The
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:12:53 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
> config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
>
> ---
+1
tested file order with:
$ touch ~/mail/mails/a
$ touch ~/mail/mails/d
$ touch ~/mail/mails/o
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:12:25 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> As of commit b3caef1f, we're using g_array_unref() in 'lib/query.cc',
> which was only introduced in glib 2.22, so update the dependency.
>
> Thanks to datap...@gmail.com for reporting this [1].
>
> Also see commit b88e6abc.
>
> [1] id:"
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:29:06 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Modify the show view key bindings as follows to make them more
> consistent:
>
> 'a' = Archive current message, then move to next message, or show next
> thread from search if at the last message in thread.
>
> 'A' = Archive each message i
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:15:42 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
>
> It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,
> because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their
> final destinations.
>
> Here's some examples:
>
> - id:"m28vkzoo8r@guru.gu
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:58:46 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> Hi Folks;
>
> After some long delays, I am finally getting 0.11.1 out the door. I
> have pushed an untagged release candidate to
>
> git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
> branch release
>
> encourage you to check it out (har har). I w
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:04:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:00:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
> > Hey, Dmitry. I'm so sorry I sent my last email on your original patch
> > before I saw this new series. I do now like your original proposal
> > better, since i
On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:31:57 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
>
> I hadn't realised before but this also goes wrong if you use the prefix
> argument to mail (eg ctrl-u m). The current code seems to mess up the
> mini-buffer and even closing the buffer does not get out of it.
>
> Changing ido-completi
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:08:50 +0100, Justus Winter
<4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> This patch series adds a section for the python binding changes to the
> NEWS file.
I marked patches 2/3 and 3/3 stale as git-am doesn't accept those anymore
on top of 2c6710e3ba22f5af6e5813dad8bee732e6
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:21:58 -, Justus Winter
<4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Quoting Tomi Ollila (2012-02-05 22:19:16)
> >On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:08:50 +0100, Justus Winter
> ><4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> >> This patch series a
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:59:34 +0100, Tamas Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just started using notmuch. It is fascinating, but I still need to
> figure out a few things:
>
> 1. How can I restrict searches (eg of my inbox) to the last few
> messages (eg 50-100) or some date (eg last 2 weeks)? I am using t
Added NEWS section 'Mail store folder/file ignore'.
---
NEWS |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 5c5b645..59da584 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ Tag exclusion
notmuch config set search.exclude_tags deleted spam
+
A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken.
This work merges my previous attempts and Andreas Amann's work
in id:"ylp7hi23mw8@tyndall.ie"
---
notmuch-client.h
Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
This is basically Pieter's work with Austin's comments addressed.
---
test/new | 22 ++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:28:24 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
> files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
>
> Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken.
>
> This work merges my p
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:21:14 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> v7:
> - Simple rebase.
The whole patch series applied cleanly (git am) on top of current origin/master
+ Dmitry's patchset
id:"1328426033-21480-2-git-send-email-dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com"
> David Edmondson (8):
> emacs: Rework cryp
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp
wrote:
> From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
>
> scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
> "collected in array namelist which is allocated via
> malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
> all the
Changes to devel/uncrustify.cfg:
* Updated header comment to state this is config file for *notmuch*.
* Added comment about the reason of 'type' keyword used.
* Added some more custom types woth 'type' keyword.
* Have (every) multiline comment lines start with '*'.
---
devel/uncrustify.cfg | 21
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:36:09 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Optimize thread tagging by combining all the tagging operations to a
> single "notmuch tag" call.
>
> For threads in the order of tens or a hundred inbox tagged messages,
> this gives a noticeable speedup. On two different machines, arc
On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:49:38 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:22:49 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > Some formatting in NEWS file has been changed so that it could
> > be given to markdown processing almost verbatim.
> > More effort has been put in
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:48:51 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Recent changes in notmuch-show tagging introduced some code
> duplication. The patch cleanups and simplifies
> `notmuch-show-archive-thread' function by using
> `notmuch-show-tag-all', no longer used function are removed. After
> the
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:20:54 -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> Anyone know what commit fixed this? Curious whether I'm using or not
> already
No, you're not.
id:"1328719731-13402-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com"
Will do this.
Tomi
PS: Top-post, yack ;)
> On Feb 8, 2012 3:13 PM, "Xavier
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:15:53 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:20:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
> > libgmime-2.6-dev entered debian unstable today. If 2.6 is available,
> > notmuch should build against 2.6 instead of 2.4, as 2.6 is the current
> > upstream stable ver
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:09:57 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:05:46 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:46:02 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
[...]
> > > + (if (or (equal notmuch-show-all-multipart/alternative-parts t)
> > > + (string= chose
Those interested in this patch set please check lates changes.
The test patch (1/3) has been slighty modified from Pieter's
version and NEWS patch (3/3) is new. The actual functionality
in patch 2/3 is exactly the same as in previous version.
This applies cleanly in top of current master
( a5674c
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:09:07 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> The notmuch-show view refresh function (`notmuch-show-refresh-view',
> bound to "=") accepts an optional RETAIN-STATE argument. The patch
> allows to set this argument interactively by using "C-u =".
> ---
+1
Tomi
__
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:02:03 +0100, Daniel Schoepe wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:29:26 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> > Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Feb 13 at 3:09 pm:
> > > The notmuch-show view refresh function (`notmuch-show-refresh-view',
> > > bound to "=") accepts an optional RETAIN-STATE
This version of 'new.ignore' patch series addresses Austin's last
comments in NEWS and test/new documentation parts.
No functional changes.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
This is basically Pieter's work with Austin's comments addressed.
---
test/new | 22 ++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --
Added NEWS section 'Mail store folder/file ignore'.
---
NEWS |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index f449fba..e9abb86 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ Tag exclusion
notmuch config set search.exclude_tags deleted spam
+
A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken.
This work merges my previous attempts and Andreas Amann's work
in id:"ylp7hi23mw8@tyndall.ie"
---
notmuch-client.h
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:09:47 +0100, Michal Sojka
wrote:
> When notmuch-search-line-faces is used to set background color in search
> results, the highlight of the current line is not always displayed
> correctly. This patch fixes that by increasing the priority property of
> the highlight overlay
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:33:35 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> The saga continues. As for the text format, this first shifts lots of
> code around without changing its semantics, then it dives in and
> simplifies a lot of things. Don't be put off by the number of
> patches; most of them are straig
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:31 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:52, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > Can we delay this patch until user-defined sections are pushed? I know
> > I promised to review it long ago. But I still did not manage to finish
> > it yet. I hope I ca
_addresses so I grabbed a copy from
> > git. When I hit tab I get this[1] Was I suppose to do something more?
>
> Just for completeness: I'm using the nice nottoomuch-addresses.pl script
> [1] by Tomi Ollila which doesn't require any bindings and is incredibly
> fast
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:33:41 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:58:50 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > Thank you for promoting my stuff.
> >
> > Latest version is 2.0 and name is now nottoomuch-addresses.sh
> > It is available at:
> >
>
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:04:12 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier
wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:46:49 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:33:41 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:58:50 +0200, Tomi Ollila
> > > wrote:
&
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:22:10 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Based on the thread at id:"20120213152858.go27...@mit.edu" it seems
> like people want show refresh to retain message state by default (I
> certainly do), rather than reset it by default. As a nice bonus, this
> fixes a broken test.
Hm
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:38:26 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> As pointed out in the previous commit, the test for replying from
> within Emacs didn't actually submit the reply. This one does.
> ---
> test/emacs | 41 +
> 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 0 d
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:38:28 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> `notmuch-search-tag-all' (bound to "*") adds and removes tags
> to/from all messages which match the query used to populate the
> current search buffer.
> ---
> test/emacs | 32
> 1 files changed, 32 inse
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:26:22 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> v2 fixes some trivial whitespace issues in devel/schemata [1] and
> beefs up one of the explanations in devel/schemata. None of the other
> patches have changed, so I'm marking this ready.
+1
Tomi
_
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:15:09 -, Justus Winter
<4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Schoepe (2012-02-17 02:28:52) [emphasis mine]:
> >Just for completeness: I'm using the nice nottoomuch-addresses.pl script
> >[1] by Tomi Ollila *which doesn&#
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:42:30 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Third time's the charm. This fixes show refresh to not mark anything
> read when keeping state while refreshing and makes it the default.
+1. LGTM. Works well.
Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:05:43 +0100, Thomas Jost wrote:
> gmime 2.6 had a bug [1] which made it impossible to tell why a signature
> verification failed when the signer key was unavailable (empty "sigstatus"
> field
> in the JSON output). Since 00b5623d the corresponding test is marked as broken
>
nottoomuch-addresses.sh -- email address substring matcher
-- completion helper version 2.1 is available.
*** ¡¡¡ This is a bugfix release !!! ***
(No wonder as this is fixing "point zero" release ;/)
Changes:
* Fixed a bug where decoding matching but unknown or malformed =?...?=-
encoded
In order for next patch to be easily useable, add
selection-menu.el to the build.
---
emacs/Makefile.local |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/Makefile.local b/emacs/Makefile.local
index 4fee0e8..ff1e0f9 100644
--- a/emacs/Makefile.local
+++ b/emacs/Mak
Replace use of completing-read with selection-menu when
completing for recipient addresses.
---
emacs/notmuch-address.el |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-address.el b/emacs/notmuch-address.el
index 2bf762b..1d63fe4 100644
--- a/emacs/notmu
menu.el
new file mode 100644
index 000..b65cef3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/emacs/selection-menu.el
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+;;; selection-menu.el --- "generic" menu to choose one string.
+;;;
+;;; Author: Tomi Ollila -- too ät iki piste fi
+
+;;; License: GPLv2+
+
+(defun selection-menu (ident items &a
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:36:23 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:10:15 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > RFC/Idea for "improving" some selections made (in notmuch or elsewhere)
> > In the hope that this will be useful, and to get some improvement advic
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:55:50 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi all, these patches add support for natural language date range search
> of the form date:since..until, where since and until can be fairly free
> form date/time expressions in English.
>
> Examples:
>
> date:two-days..yesterday (all mai
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:53:27 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:05:44 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
[ ... ]
> >
> > By seeing the thoughts thrown in IRC there seems to be plenty if things
> > to resolve until something like this is going to be available in
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:42:36 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
> you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:
>
> yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel
>
> to get:
>
> $ rpm -q notmuch gmime
> notm
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > > wrote:
> >
> > How about if '*' applies to all messa
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:13:04 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> As requested by David (Bremner) on irc here is a patch series
> disabling the search.exclude_tags feature as a temporary measure for
> the 0.12 release.
>
> There are two options:
>
> The first is to disable the addition of the new searc
After retrieving gpg key retain show buffer state like in
all other operations (i.e. no other calls to notmuch-show-refresh-view
provides optional reset-state argument).
Emacs MUA keeps current message under cursor instead of going first
open message(possibly marking it read).
---
emacs/notmuch-cr
Retreive is spelled as r e t r i e v e .
---
emacs/notmuch-crypto.el |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-crypto.el b/emacs/notmuch-crypto.el
index e916d66..83e5d37 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-crypto.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-crypto.el
@@ -101,7 +101,
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:20:20 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> The show (rewrite) must go on. These are the last two formats in
> notmuch show proper; the only remaining format is the reply format.
>
> One of the ultimate goals of the show rewrite is to make raw actually
> work (and probably to sp
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:17:43 +0100, Daniel Schoepe wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:21:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:38 +0100, Daniel Schoepe
> > wrote:
> > > notmuch-saved-search-sort-function might destructively modify its
> > > input (`sort' does that, for
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:22:55 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:48:39 +, Austin Clements wrote:
> > Formatter errors are propagated to the exit status of notmuch show.
> >
> > This isn't used by the JSON or text formatters, but it will be useful
> > for the raw format, whic
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:48:15 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> It seems that it has always been an error to try to parse an mbox
> format file with gmime without calling g_mime_parser_set_scan_from.
At least for the time being I think we should apply
http://en.wikipedia.org/
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:25:31 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> Some MDAs such as procmail (in MH mode), and exim (doing local
> delivery in some configurations of the appendfile transport) add a
> line to the front of a message with "From " followed by envelope
> sender. Sin
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:25:38 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> The reply MML quoting added in commit ae438cc unintentionally MML
> quotes also the signature/encryption MML tags added via
> message-setup-hook, causing the reply not to be signed/encrypted.
>
> MML quote just the original message in the t
101 - 200 of 2025 matches
Mail list logo
