On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:54:46 +0100, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:45:19 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
>
> > Recent versions of GMime perform more robust parsing that fix the
> > problem, but unfortunately debian only ship old versions of the package.
>
> In this case, I'm
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:54:46 +0100, Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:45:19 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Recent versions of GMime perform more robust parsing that fix the
problem, but unfortunately debian only ship old versions of the
Hallo!
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:31:49 -0700, Thomas Schwinge
> wrote:
> > These tests should pass -- but they currently don't.
> Thanks for sending these test cases. This is actually my favorite way to
> receive bug reports. I really
Hallo!
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:45:19 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> I had already reported this problem in id:"87ipzvk2xh.fsf at free.fr".
Oh, I see!
> Recent versions of GMime perform more robust parsing that fix the
> problem, but unfortunately debian only ship old versions of the package.
Hallo!
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:45:19 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
I had already reported this problem in id:87ipzvk2xh@free.fr.
Oh, I see!
Recent versions of GMime perform more robust parsing that fix the
problem, but unfortunately debian only ship old versions of the
> Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my
> recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header that
> is currently formatted as:
>
> From: LWN.net Weekly Notification
>
> should instead be:
>
> From: "LWN.net Weekly Notification"
Hi all,
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:17:54 -0700, Jake Edge wrote:
> Hi Carl and Thomas,
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000 Carl Worth wrote:
>
> > Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my
> > recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header
> > that is currently
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:31:49 -0700, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> These tests should pass -- but they currently don't.
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for sending these test cases. This is actually my favorite way to
receive bug reports. I really appreciate it!
> What we get from these emails, is an author
Hi Carl and Thomas,
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000 Carl Worth wrote:
Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my
recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header
that is currently formatted as:
From: LWN.net Weekly Notification l...@lwn.net
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:17:54 -0700, Jake Edge j...@lwn.net wrote:
Hi Carl and Thomas,
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000 Carl Worth wrote:
Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my
recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header
that is
Hi Carl and Thomas,
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:59:38 +1000 Carl Worth wrote:
> Yes, I believe this is related to the dot in the name. From my
> recollection a name with an address requires quoting. So the header
> that is currently formatted as:
>
> From: LWN.net Weekly Notification
>
>
These tests should pass -- but they currently don't.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Schwinge
---
Hallo!
I reported this on IRC some weeks ago; here is a more elaborate report.
What we get from these emails, is an author named ``LWN.net'', and the
``Weekly Notification'' / ``Mailing Lists'' bits are
12 matches
Mail list logo