On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:52:22 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 23 at 1:13 am:
> > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements
> > wrote:
> > > Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
> > > > Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok Having
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:52:22 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 23 at 1:13 am:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu
wrote:
Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 24 at 1:05 am:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:52:22 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 23 at 1:13 am:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu
wrote:
Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
Quoth
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 24 at 1:05 am:
>
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:52:22 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 23 at 1:13 am:
> > > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements
> > > wrote:
> > > > Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
> > > > > Quoth Mark
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
> > Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
> > >
> > > Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
> > > notmuch do if you do something like
> > >
> > > notmuch show id:
>
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 23 at 1:13 am:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
> > > Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
> > > >
> > > > Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
> > > > notmuch do
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
> > Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
> > >
> > > Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
> > > notmuch do if you do something like
> > >
> > > notmuch show id:
>
Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
> Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
> >
> > Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
> > notmuch do if you do something like
> >
> > notmuch show id:
> > and that message is marked with a deleted tag? To be consistent with the
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 22 at 12:38 am:
>
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:18:01 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> >
> > Oh dear.
> >
> > Well, here's one idea. Instead of doing a single thread query in
> > show, do a thread query without the exclusions and then a message
> > query with the
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:18:01 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Oh dear.
>
> Well, here's one idea. Instead of doing a single thread query in
> show, do a thread query without the exclusions and then a message
> query with the exclusions. Output all of the messages from the first
> query, but
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 22 at 12:38 am:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:18:01 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Oh dear.
Well, here's one idea. Instead of doing a single thread query in
show, do a thread query without the exclusions and then a message
query with the
Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
notmuch do if you do something like
notmuch show id:some-id
and that message is marked with a deleted tag? To be consistent with the
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
notmuch do if you do something like
notmuch show
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
notmuch do if you do something like
notmuch show
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 23 at 1:13 am:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:16:09 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth myself on Jan 20 at 12:18 pm:
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
notmuch do if
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:18:01 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Oh dear.
Well, here's one idea. Instead of doing a single thread query in
show, do a thread query without the exclusions and then a message
query with the exclusions. Output all of the messages from the first
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
>
> Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
> notmuch do if you do something like
>
> notmuch show id:
> and that message is marked with a deleted tag? To be consistent with the
> other cases (where a deleted message is in a
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:59:10 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> LGTM, but should definitely come with a test.
>
[...]
> Also, this won't commute with Pieter's patch
> (id:"1327000744-25463-2-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"), so one or
> the other will have to get updated.
>
No problem, I'll
Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
notmuch do if you do something like
notmuch show id:
and that message is marked with a deleted tag? To be consistent with the
other cases (where a deleted message is in a matched thread) we might
want to return the message with
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 20 at 12:10 am:
Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
notmuch do if you do something like
notmuch show id:some-id
and that message is marked with a deleted tag? To be consistent with the
other cases (where a deleted message is in a
Add the use of auto_exclude_tags in notmuch-show.c. As with Austin's
patch (commit 42a907992823030f070fc395a174f779998ca6f5) it just adds
the excluded tags to the query so the excluded messages will still
appear in the emacs interface, but as a single header line rather than
as a matching
LGTM, but should definitely come with a test.
Also, this won't commute with Pieter's patch
(id:"1327000744-25463-2-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org"), so one or
the other will have to get updated.
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 19 at 10:03 pm:
> Add the use of auto_exclude_tags in notmuch-show.c.
Add the use of auto_exclude_tags in notmuch-show.c. As with Austin's
patch (commit 42a907992823030f070fc395a174f779998ca6f5) it just adds
the excluded tags to the query so the excluded messages will still
appear in the emacs interface, but as a single header line rather than
as a matching
LGTM, but should definitely come with a test.
Also, this won't commute with Pieter's patch
(id:1327000744-25463-2-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org), so one or
the other will have to get updated.
Quoth Mark Walters on Jan 19 at 10:03 pm:
Add the use of auto_exclude_tags in notmuch-show.c. As
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:59:10 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
LGTM, but should definitely come with a test.
[...]
Also, this won't commute with Pieter's patch
(id:1327000744-25463-2-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org), so one or
the other will have to get updated.
No problem,
Ok Having said this is trivial I have found a problem. What should
notmuch do if you do something like
notmuch show id:some-id
and that message is marked with a deleted tag? To be consistent with the
other cases (where a deleted message is in a matched thread) we might
want to return the message
26 matches
Mail list logo
