Re: [PATCH] NEWS for emacs

2017-03-07 Thread David Bremner
Mark Walters writes: > --- > > This is the NEWS updates for most of my changes. I am not quite sure > whether any of my other changes warranted news items -- prod me if you > think they do. I've pushed these to master and release. I prefer to be a bit aggressive applying NEWS patches otherwise t

[PATCH] NEWS for emacs

2017-03-06 Thread Mark Walters
--- This is the NEWS updates for most of my changes. I am not quite sure whether any of my other changes warranted news items -- prod me if you think they do. Note I changed the heading to Emacs not Emacs Interface to match previous releases but obviously that can be changed back if you prefer.

[PATCH] News for emacs saved-searches change.

2014-04-11 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Wed, Apr 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote: > --- > The important point is that the changed search variable is not forward > compatible (it *is* backwards compatible): that is previous version of > notmuch-emacs will be unusable with a new style notmuch-saved-search > variable. the above part could

[PATCH] News for emacs saved-searches change.

2014-04-11 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > > I'm afraid the `just work' work badly when contained in markdown page > (perhaps *just work*?). > sorry missed that. Care to fixup my mess? ;) d

[PATCH] News for emacs saved-searches change.

2014-04-11 Thread David Bremner
Mark Walters writes: > --- > The important point is that the changed search variable is not forward > compatible (it *is* backwards compatible): that is previous version of > notmuch-emacs will be unusable with a new style notmuch-saved-search > variable. pushed, with that paragraph as commit me

Re: [PATCH] News for emacs saved-searches change.

2014-04-11 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > > I'm afraid the `just work' work badly when contained in markdown page > (perhaps *just work*?). > sorry missed that. Care to fixup my mess? ;) d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/lis

Re: [PATCH] News for emacs saved-searches change.

2014-04-11 Thread David Bremner
Mark Walters writes: > --- > The important point is that the changed search variable is not forward > compatible (it *is* backwards compatible): that is previous version of > notmuch-emacs will be unusable with a new style notmuch-saved-search > variable. pushed, with that paragraph as commit me

Re: [PATCH] News for emacs saved-searches change.

2014-04-11 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Wed, Apr 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote: > --- > The important point is that the changed search variable is not forward > compatible (it *is* backwards compatible): that is previous version of > notmuch-emacs will be unusable with a new style notmuch-saved-search > variable. the above part could

[PATCH] News for emacs saved-searches change.

2014-04-09 Thread Mark Walters
--- The important point is that the changed search variable is not forward compatible (it *is* backwards compatible): that is previous version of notmuch-emacs will be unusable with a new style notmuch-saved-search variable. Best wishes Mark NEWS | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 i

[PATCH] News for emacs saved-searches change.

2014-04-09 Thread Mark Walters
--- The important point is that the changed search variable is not forward compatible (it *is* backwards compatible): that is previous version of notmuch-emacs will be unusable with a new style notmuch-saved-search variable. Best wishes Mark NEWS | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 i

[PATCH] NEWS for emacs part visibility change

2012-12-25 Thread David Bremner
Mark Walters writes: > Wording suggested by Austin. > --- pushed. d

Re: [PATCH] NEWS for emacs part visibility change

2012-12-25 Thread David Bremner
Mark Walters writes: > Wording suggested by Austin. > --- pushed. d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

[PATCH] NEWS for emacs part visibility change

2012-12-25 Thread Mark Walters
Wording suggested by Austin. --- I have taken Austin's (excellent) wording and agree with the downplaying of notmuch-show-all-multipart/alternative-parts. Best wishes Mark NEWS | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 0de685a..69f21

[PATCH] NEWS for emacs part visibility change

2012-12-25 Thread Austin Clements
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Mark Walters wrote: > --- > Here is some news for the recent part visibility change. I am not > completely happy with the wording so please do read. In particular > should it mention how the user's preferred part is chosen > (notmuch-multipart/alternative-discouraged etc)? > >

[PATCH] NEWS for emacs part visibility change

2012-12-25 Thread Mark Walters
Wording suggested by Austin. --- I have taken Austin's (excellent) wording and agree with the downplaying of notmuch-show-all-multipart/alternative-parts. Best wishes Mark NEWS | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 0de685a..69f21

Re: [PATCH] NEWS for emacs part visibility change

2012-12-25 Thread Austin Clements
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Mark Walters wrote: > --- > Here is some news for the recent part visibility change. I am not > completely happy with the wording so please do read. In particular > should it mention how the user's preferred part is chosen > (notmuch-multipart/alternative-discouraged etc)? > >

[PATCH] NEWS for emacs part visibility change

2012-12-23 Thread Mark Walters
--- Here is some news for the recent part visibility change. I am not completely happy with the wording so please do read. In particular should it mention how the user's preferred part is chosen (notmuch-multipart/alternative-discouraged etc)? Best wishes Mark NEWS | 10 ++ 1 files c

[PATCH] NEWS for emacs part visibility change

2012-12-23 Thread Mark Walters
--- Here is some news for the recent part visibility change. I am not completely happy with the wording so please do read. In particular should it mention how the user's preferred part is chosen (notmuch-multipart/alternative-discouraged etc)? Best wishes Mark NEWS | 10 ++ 1 files c