Le 28 juin 2012 ? 18:21 CEST, Jameson Graef Rollins a ?crit :
> On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of
>> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having
>> some key binding to add the rest of the
Jesse Rosenthal writes:
...
> If it's not obvious, I'm pretty strongly against Carl's roll-back. I
> could, of course, just uncomment my old correction in my .emacs, but I
> think it's a change that could hurt users. Those who are more likely to
> prefer the reply-all behavior are more likely
On Jun 28, 2012 3:06 AM, "David Bremner" wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > This restores the original keybinding and uses the new keybinding for
> > > the new feature.
>
> My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...
And mine in that I sent the
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...
And mine in that the first thing I did in my .emacs, back in 2009 or so,
was write a reply-to-sender function, and reverse the behavior. In fact,
I just got around to using the
Philip Hands writes:
> I find the change to the new (only reply to sender) behaviour serously
> irritating, because it seems I cannot train myself to hit R all the time
> (which is pretty much what I always want).
I'm in a similar camp. I tried (and failed) to adopt to the current
mode, (once I
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands wrote:
> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of
> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having
> some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip
> between the two options so one can
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> Of course, it is not my project so I am happy to go along with whatever
> choice is made.
I think everyone who has put in time and effort to make the project
great can claim a little bit of ownership. And that certainly includes
you, Mark.
jamie.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
>> > Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
>> > of 'r' to reply to a message, (and
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
of 'r' to
On Jun 28, 2012 3:06 AM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
This restores the original keybinding and uses the new keybinding for
the new feature.
My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...
And mine in
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...
And mine in that the first thing I did in my .emacs, back in 2009 or so,
was write a reply-to-sender function, and reverse the behavior. In fact,
I just got around to
Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu writes:
...
If it's not obvious, I'm pretty strongly against Carl's roll-back. I
could, of course, just uncomment my old correction in my .emacs, but I
think it's a change that could hurt users. Those who are more likely to
prefer the reply-all behavior are
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, it is not my project so I am happy to go along with whatever
choice is made.
I think everyone who has put in time and effort to make the project
great can claim a little bit of ownership. And that certainly includes
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:
Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of
letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having
some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip
between the two options so
Le 28 juin 2012 à 18:21 CEST, Jameson Graef Rollins a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:
Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of
letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having
some key binding to add the rest of
Philip Hands p...@hands.com writes:
I find the change to the new (only reply to sender) behaviour serously
irritating, because it seems I cannot train myself to hit R all the time
(which is pretty much what I always want).
I'm in a similar camp. I tried (and failed) to adopt to the current
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> > Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
> > of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
> >
> > Then, before release 0.12 the emacs
On Wed, 27.06.2012 19:55, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> I actually rebound these keys immediately after the release, so I'm
> perfectly happy to change back.
Same here.
I think the ratio of cases where I wanted to reply to all
participants instead compared to just to the sender is something
On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
> of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
>
> Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new
> reply-to-sender only feature. In commit
>
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new
reply-to-sender only feature. In commit
f02b475fa781bb5df3358c73213e7633a99f016e the new feature was
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new
reply-to-sender only feature. In commit
f02b475fa781bb5df3358c73213e7633a99f016e the new feature was
On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new
reply-to-sender only feature. In commit
On Wed, 27.06.2012 19:55, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
I actually rebound these keys immediately after the release, so I'm
perfectly happy to change back.
Same here.
I think the ratio of cases where I wanted to reply to all
participants instead compared to just to the sender is something like
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
24 matches
Mail list logo
