On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:56:37 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:41 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > > wrote:
> > > > When running the Emacs
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:56:37 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:41 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100,
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:09:37 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
> prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
> early:
pushed.
d
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:41 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > wrote:
> > > When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
> > > prereq is reported
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:09:37 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
> prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
> early:
>
> #+begin_example
> emacs: Testing emacs interface
> missing
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:09:37 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
early:
#+begin_example
emacs: Testing emacs interface
missing
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:41 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:09:37 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
early:
pushed.
d
___
notmuch mailing
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
early:
#+begin_example
emacs: Testing emacs interface
missing prerequisites: [0] emacs(1)
skipping test: [0] Basic notmuch-hello view in
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
> > prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
> > early:
> >
> >
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
early:
#+begin_example
emacs: Testing emacs interface
missing prerequisites: [0] emacs(1)
skipping test: [0] Basic notmuch-hello view in
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
> prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
> early:
>
> #+begin_example
> emacs: Testing emacs interface
> missing
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
early:
#+begin_example
emacs: Testing emacs interface
missing prerequisites: [0] emacs(1)
skipping test: [0] Basic notmuch-hello view in
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing
prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited
early:
#+begin_example
emacs: Testing emacs interface
missing
14 matches
Mail list logo