[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-16 Thread Pieter Praet
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:56:37 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:41 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet > > > wrote: > > > > When running the Emacs

Re: [PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-16 Thread Pieter Praet
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:56:37 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:41 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100,

[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-15 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:09:37 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing > prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited > early: pushed. d

[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-15 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:41 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet > > wrote: > > > When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing > > > prereq is reported

[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-15 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:09:37 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing > prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited > early: > > #+begin_example > emacs: Testing emacs interface > missing

Re: [PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-15 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:09:37 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited early: #+begin_example emacs: Testing emacs interface missing

Re: [PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-15 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:41 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the

Re: [PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-15 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:09:37 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited early: pushed. d ___ notmuch mailing

[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-14 Thread Pieter Praet
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited early: #+begin_example emacs: Testing emacs interface missing prerequisites: [0] emacs(1) skipping test: [0] Basic notmuch-hello view in

[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-14 Thread Pieter Praet
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:34:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > > When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing > > prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited > > early: > > > >

[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-14 Thread Pieter Praet
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited early: #+begin_example emacs: Testing emacs interface missing prerequisites: [0] emacs(1) skipping test: [0] Basic notmuch-hello view in

[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-12 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing > prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited > early: > > #+begin_example > emacs: Testing emacs interface > missing

[PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-12 Thread Pieter Praet
When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited early: #+begin_example emacs: Testing emacs interface missing prerequisites: [0] emacs(1) skipping test: [0] Basic notmuch-hello view in

Re: [PATCH] test: don't bail out of `run_emacs' too early when missing prereqs

2012-01-12 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: When running the Emacs tests in verbose mode, only the first missing prereq is reported because the `run_emacs' function is short-circuited early: #+begin_example emacs: Testing emacs interface missing