[PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-06-02 Thread David Bremner
Felipe Contreras writes: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:41 AM, David Bremner wrote: > >> At this point we wait for somebody (else) with Fedora expertise to >> review the patches. > > Like who? I though the reason these were never updated is that there > wasn't anybody else. Hmm. Somehow I missed T

Re: [PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-06-02 Thread David Bremner
Felipe Contreras writes: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:41 AM, David Bremner wrote: > >> At this point we wait for somebody (else) with Fedora expertise to >> review the patches. > > Like who? I though the reason these were never updated is that there > wasn't anybody else. Hmm. Somehow I missed T

[PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-05-28 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:41 AM, David Bremner wrote: > At this point we wait for somebody (else) with Fedora expertise to > review the patches. Like who? I though the reason these were never updated is that there wasn't anybody else. -- Felipe Contreras

Re: [PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-05-28 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:41 AM, David Bremner wrote: > At this point we wait for somebody (else) with Fedora expertise to > review the patches. Like who? I though the reason these were never updated is that there wasn't anybody else. -- Felipe Contreras ___

[PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-05-25 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Apr 28 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Hi, > > It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much better > now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. > > Felipe Contreras (8): > packaging: fedora: update > packaging: fedora: remove irrelevant

[PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-05-25 Thread David Bremner
Felipe Contreras writes: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Felipe Contreras > wrote: > >> It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much >> better >> now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. > > What about these? > Hi Felipe At this point we w

Re: [PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-05-25 Thread David Bremner
Felipe Contreras writes: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Felipe Contreras > wrote: > >> It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much >> better >> now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. > > What about these? > Hi Felipe At this point we w

Re: [PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-05-25 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Apr 28 2013, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Hi, > > It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much better > now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. > > Felipe Contreras (8): > packaging: fedora: update > packaging: fedora: remove irrelevant

[PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-05-23 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much better > now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. What about these? -- Felipe Contreras

Re: [PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-05-23 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much better > now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. What about these? -- Felipe Contreras ___ not

[PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-04-28 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much better now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. Felipe Contreras (8): packaging: fedora: update packaging: fedora: remove irrelevant stuff packaging: fedora: trivial cleanups packaging: fed

[PATCH 0/8] packaging: fedora: general updates

2013-04-28 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, It doesn't seem the spec file is properly maintained, it should be much better now, closer to Fedora's one, and with support for Ruby bindings. Felipe Contreras (8): packaging: fedora: update packaging: fedora: remove irrelevant stuff packaging: fedora: trivial cleanups packaging: fed