On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:02:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:58:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> > > with a button wi
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:58:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> > with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
> > minibuffer as us
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:02:55 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> It's also simpler to have a global keybinding for `notmuch-search' than
> to run `notmuch' and then click on the "search" button.
We actually have that everywhere else *but* notmuch-hello; notmuch-hello
is actually the odd man out in th
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:02:55 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> It's also simpler to have a global keybinding for `notmuch-search' than
> to run `notmuch' and then click on the "search" button.
We actually have that everywhere else *but* notmuch-hello; notmuch-hello
is actually the odd man out in th
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:02:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:58:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > wrote:
> > > I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> > > with a button wich woul
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
> minibuffer as usual. This way we do not have to maintain 2 search
> interfaces and get history
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:58:02 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> > with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
> > minibuffer as usual. Th
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
> with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
> minibuffer as usual. This way we do not have to maintain 2 search
> interfaces and get histor
I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
minibuffer as usual. This way we do not have to maintain 2 search
interfaces and get history, tab completions and other minibuffer
features in notmuch-hello sear
I got some positive feedback for replacing notmuch-hello search input
with a button wich would call `notmuch-search' and read input from
minibuffer as usual. This way we do not have to maintain 2 search
interfaces and get history, tab completions and other minibuffer
features in notmuch-hello sear
There are two ways to do search in Emacs UI: search widget in
notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search' function bound to "s".
Before the change, these search mechanisms used different history
lists. The patch makes notmuch-hello search use the same history list
as `notmuch-search' function.
---
There are two ways to do search in Emacs UI: search widget in
notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search' function bound to "s".
Before the change, these search mechanisms used different history
lists. The patch makes notmuch-hello search use the same history list
as `notmuch-search' function.
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
