Quoth myself on Jan 18 at 9:12 pm:
> Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 19 at 12:25 am:
> > FWIW, I'm not a big fan of casting away const. Either it is const, or it
> > isn't. Not very many places would be affected if you dropped the const
> > qualifier from the related interface(s) altogether, and things
Quoth myself on Jan 18 at 9:12 pm:
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 19 at 12:25 am:
FWIW, I'm not a big fan of casting away const. Either it is const, or it
isn't. Not very many places would be affected if you dropped the const
qualifier from the related interface(s) altogether, and things would
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:28:25 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> This makes the part numbers readily accessible to formatters.
> Hierarchical part numbering would be a more natural and efficient fit
> for MIME and may be the way to go in the future, but depth-first
> numbering maintains compatibility
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 19 at 12:25 am:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:28:25 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > This makes the part numbers readily accessible to formatters.
> > Hierarchical part numbering would be a more natural and efficient fit
> > for MIME and may be the way to go in the future,
This makes the part numbers readily accessible to formatters.
Hierarchical part numbering would be a more natural and efficient fit
for MIME and may be the way to go in the future, but depth-first
numbering maintains compatibility with what we currently do.
---
mime-node.c | 33
This makes the part numbers readily accessible to formatters.
Hierarchical part numbering would be a more natural and efficient fit
for MIME and may be the way to go in the future, but depth-first
numbering maintains compatibility with what we currently do.
---
mime-node.c | 33
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:28:25 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
This makes the part numbers readily accessible to formatters.
Hierarchical part numbering would be a more natural and efficient fit
for MIME and may be the way to go in the future, but depth-first
numbering maintains
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 19 at 12:25 am:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:28:25 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
This makes the part numbers readily accessible to formatters.
Hierarchical part numbering would be a more natural and efficient fit
for MIME and may be the way to go in the
