[PATCH 1/4] Add the option "--reply-to" to notmuch reply.

2012-01-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:08:20 +, Mark Walters wrote: > I think replying to an email which we sent and which does not have any > other person on the to: line is sufficiently rare that it doesn't really > matter what we do in this case. I ended up fixing all of this properly. I'm hoping to

[PATCH 1/4] Add the option "--reply-to" to notmuch reply.

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Walters
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:47:33 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > + /* We add the addresses if we are replying to all or we have not yet > > found > > +* a non-user address. We have to keep parsing to make sure we do find > > the > > +* correct from address for the user, but we pass a NULL

[PATCH 1/4] Add the option "--reply-to" to notmuch reply.

2012-01-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:34:14 +, Mark Walters wrote: > Possible values for this option are "sender" which replies just to > sender and "all" (the default). > > More precisely reply to sender follows these rules: > reply only to sender unless it was the user > reply only

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add the option --reply-to to notmuch reply.

2012-01-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:34:14 +, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote: Possible values for this option are sender which replies just to sender and all (the default). More precisely reply to sender follows these rules: reply only to sender unless it was the user

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add the option --reply-to to notmuch reply.

2012-01-08 Thread Mark Walters
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:47:33 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote: + /* We add the addresses if we are replying to all or we have not yet found +* a non-user address. We have to keep parsing to make sure we do find the +* correct from address for the user, but we pass a

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add the option --reply-to to notmuch reply.

2012-01-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:08:20 +, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote: I think replying to an email which we sent and which does not have any other person on the to: line is sufficiently rare that it doesn't really matter what we do in this case. I ended up fixing all of this

[PATCH 1/4] Add the option "--reply-to" to notmuch reply.

2012-01-06 Thread Mark Walters
Possible values for this option are "sender" which replies just to sender and "all" (the default). More precisely reply to sender follows these rules: reply only to sender unless it was the user reply only to all people on the "to" line unless they were all the user reply

[PATCH 1/4] Add the option --reply-to to notmuch reply.

2012-01-06 Thread Mark Walters
Possible values for this option are sender which replies just to sender and all (the default). More precisely reply to sender follows these rules: reply only to sender unless it was the user reply only to all people on the to line unless they were all the user reply to all