On Mon 2019-06-24 19:43:58 -0700, William Casarin wrote:
>> +static bool
>> +_mime_node_set_up_part (mime_node_t *node, GMimeObject *part, int numchild);
>> +
>
> nit: Instead of a forward declaration, could _mime_node_create be moved after
> _mime_node_set_up_part instead?
yep, we could
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> This is a code reorganization that should have no functional effect,
> but will make future changes simpler, because a future commit will
> reuse the _mime_node_set_up_part functionality without touching
> _mime_node_create.
>
> In the course of splitting out this
This is a code reorganization that should have no functional effect,
but will make future changes simpler, because a future commit will
reuse the _mime_node_set_up_part functionality without touching
_mime_node_create.
In the course of splitting out this function, I noticed a comment in
the
