Daniel Schoepe writes:
>
> It might be helpful to describe why --db-revision is needed here. At
> first glance, just using `notmuch search lastmod:UUID..' looks good
> enough to get all changed messages since UUID. Indeed, it's not entirely
> clear to me under what conditions just using this
On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 19:28 +0200, David Bremner wrote:
> +The **lastmod:** prefix can be used to restrict the result by the
> +database revision number of when messages were last modified (tags
> +were added/removed or filenames changed). This is usually used in
> +conjunction with the
On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 19:28 +0200, David Bremner wrote:
+The **lastmod:** prefix can be used to restrict the result by the
+database revision number of when messages were last modified (tags
+were added/removed or filenames changed). This is usually used in
+conjunction with the
Daniel Schoepe dan...@schoepe.org writes:
It might be helpful to describe why --db-revision is needed here. At
first glance, just using `notmuch search lastmod:UUID..' looks good
enough to get all changed messages since UUID. Indeed, it's not entirely
clear to me under what conditions just
From: Austin Clements
The implementation is essentially the same as the date range search
prior to Jani's fancy date parser.
---
doc/man7/notmuch-search-terms.rst | 8
lib/database-private.h| 1 +
lib/database.cc | 4
From: Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu
The implementation is essentially the same as the date range search
prior to Jani's fancy date parser.
---
doc/man7/notmuch-search-terms.rst | 8
lib/database-private.h| 1 +
lib/database.cc | 4