Tomi Ollila writes:
> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
> keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
> these modules fails due to duplicate symbols.
Tomi Ollila writes:
> Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
> of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
> keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
> these modules fails due to duplicate symbols.
LGTM
Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes:
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
these modules fails due to duplicate
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
these modules fails due to duplicate symbols.
This is reimplementation of Charlie
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
these modules fails due to duplicate symbols.
This is reimplementation of Charlie
2012/6/24 Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi:
Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition
of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern'
keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all
these modules fails due to duplicate
